Multiple Divorces On The Rise

[Oz-BlokeParticipant 3233]

Having been through the marriage-divorce meat grinder once, I can’t for the life of me grasp why any man in his right mind would go back for a second, third, or forth helping of divorce-rape. I subtly suggest to my young male colleagues that marriage and children are a trap, but they are often slaves to societal and biological programming and so it must be done discreetly, out of earshot of their ever-hovering handbrake desperate for her ageing eggs to be fertilized. And yet the Daily Mail reports that Multiple Divorces Are Increasingly Common.

Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice ….. Now the article tries to paint the women as victims who are racked with self-doubt wondering why their second and third marriages failed. You would think their ‘maturity’ would bring with it the ‘wisdom’ that once their Sexual Market Value (SMV) ‘Wall’ goes up, it never comes down but just gets higher and thicker with time –

The article quotes 45-year-old psychology lecturer turned fashion designer Sarah Milne who thought she found in marriage number two a cuckold to look after her kids while she took a long daily commute job in London. Understandably, husband number two thought ‘f~~~ this, I didn’t sign up to be a glorified baby-sitter’. The irony here is that Sarah married two fellow psychologists and couldn’t make either of the those marriages work. So if professionals academically trained in the deepest workings of the male and female brains can’t make it work, what hope do the rest of us have?

Ironically, the rest of us are encouraged to attend marriage counselling (psychologists) pre-divorce to ‘help work things out’ when half the time psychologists are trying tow work out their own scrambled minds! The sooner psychologists acknowledge the PLANTATION and men’s fundamental RIGHT to REJECT it, the better.

#ManOut

[HitmanParticipant]

marriage is an outdated institution.
no longer needed.
when royalty wanted to forge an alliance,
they would marry into the royal family of the country they wanted to ally with.
the common people or commoners didn’t marry..
they lived together.
the woman often had numerous children from previous men,
the man that stayed did so in exchange for having his needs met.
.
they were always whores.

[BeerParticipant 11832]

Oz-Bloke wrote:

Having been through the marriage-divorce meat grinder once, I can’t for the life of me grasp why any man in his right mind would go back for a second, third, or forth helping of divorce-rape.

I was camping with some friends a few years back, and two of them who were both 50ish at the time were talking about women. One of them had 3 divorces under his belt and was currently seeing some woman he had been dating for about a year, and the other had just recently gotten hammered by his first divorce to a woman he was married to for over 20 years. They were both complaining about their finances with them both being at an age where they needed to really get serious about getting something set aside for retirement, and the solution they came up with to have a stable retirement was to get married again so they could have a woman to combine finances with and build something together before its too late.

I didn’t even know what MGTOW was at the time, but all I could think after listening to their conversation about how bad divorces had f~~~ed them over in the past, and then hearing their solution to make sure they have a solid retirement was WTF!!!! How stupid could they be! Some guys just don’t f~~~ing get it. They both lost hundreds of thousands of dollars in divorce(s) and think trying for one more marriage might be good for them financially…lol?

[bladeParticipant]

Female pshycologists are the dangerous feminists i have encountered and will never see one again.I have seen 4 and all of them were divorced.When i seen what they wrote about me i was shocked.Family court reporter who was a pshycologist said i was narcissistic and blamed everyone in order to keep in line with the gag order family court have on me.She was divorced with her two kids living with there father 300 km away from her.

Like your facts and figures oz bloke and would appreciate if you could do a thread on child abuse family court with stats because i an appointment with a member of parliment comming up.child abuse and family court

THE PLANTATION HAS NOW TURNED INTO THE KILLING FIELDS . WOMAN ARE NOW ROLLING CAMBODIAN STYLE .

[MGTOWmonkey aka No More Fucks To GiveParticipant 6635]

When slaves were finally freed some still returned to their masters,crazy as it sounds. Now apply that concept to these asshats who keep going back for more court penetration.

Never lose sight of what brought you here.

[Oz-BlokeParticipant 3233]

blade wrote:

would appreciate if you could do a thread on child abuse family court with stats

A good mate who studied psychology (but doesn’t practice) informed me that a huge chunk of domestic violence is committed by women smacking children. Because this data does not fit with the feminist, gynocentric propaganda which helps fund the feminist industry, this data is not included in the general domestic violence data presented to us in the mainstream media.

Researching the topic, I discovered a British retrospective prevalence study entitled Measuring child maltreatment in the United Kingdom: a study of the prevalence of child abuse and neglect of 2,869 young adults aged 18-24 (May-Chahal & Cawson, 2005) found that mothers were more likely than fathers to be responsible for physical abuse (49% of incidents compared to 40%).

So where are all the TV and print commercials calling on mothers to stop being the primary initiators of domestic violence against children? I don’t recall a single one, yet all the domestic violence ads I recall have a women portrayed as the victim. In previous posts I have linked to an American study which found that in more than 70% of incidences of non-reciprocated domestic violence, WOMEN were the attackers. And because VAGINA, that’s a hell of a lot of women beating up men who they know (because of societal conventions) will not hit back –

I once had a drunk girlfriend start hitting me after a verbal argument in a taxi. All I could do was hold her wrists to stop her punches hitting my face. Dumped her the very next day when she was sober and would comprehend. Never put your dick in crazy. I can’t understand either men or women who would tolerate such behaviour.

#ManOut

[FunInTheSunParticipant 8283]

Two psychologists living in the same house…analyzing each other DAILY.

God help us.

"I saw that there comes a point, in the defeat of any man of virtue, when his own consent is needed for evil to win-and that no manner of injury done to him by others can succeed if he chooses to withhold his consent. I saw that I could put an end to your outrages by pronouncing a single word in my mind. I pronounced it. The word was ‘No.’" (Atlas Shrugged)

[Freeman_KParticipant 3524]

Oz-Bloke wrote:

I subtly suggest to my young male colleagues that marriage and children are a trap, but they are often slaves to societal and biological programming

Marriage is obsolete in modern society. Marriage was a risky move when you got a 19 years old virgin in traditional society where hypergamy would be frawned upon.

With modern females, well LOL. I do have biological programming to tackle though, could not care less about societal programming. But biological programming can be tackled without marrying.

The choices we make, not the chances we take, determine our destiny

[AwakenedParticipant 35201]

Beer wrote:

I was camping with some friends a few years back, and two of them who were both 50ish at the time were talking about women. One of them had 3 divorces under his belt and was currently seeing some woman he had been dating for about a year, and the other had just recently gotten hammered by his first divorce to a woman he was married to for over 20 years. They were both complaining about their finances with them both being at an age where they needed to really get serious about getting something set aside for retirement, and the solution they came up with to have a stable retirement was to get married again so they could have a woman to combine finances with and build something together before its too late

The warn out saying, “The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over expecting a different result.” fits here as well.
I too work with a late 50ish/early 60ish man that recently got re-married. About 5 years ago, he made his last child support payment, and treated himself to a new convertable. He already had his own house. I thought he had it made, and then a couple years ago, he ran out and got married again. Of course, he hasn’t gotten any new cars, and won’t unless he gets approval. Also, he sold HIS house to move into hers. Really, he gave it all up at this late stage in life for just another old bag!! Good luck with all that!!

This man has a PHD in engineering, but is complete failure in understanding the nature of women. I pitty the fool!!

In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash

[bigboy83Participant 11312]

Ironically, its just like a turn wheel, around, and around. Evidence the c~~~s are the same, they marry the same guys too. Lol

Shit Tested, Cunt Approved.

[Won'tGetFooledAgainParticipant 3293]

I have also been through the divorce meat grinder and I really don’t understand why anybody would be stupid enough to risk it again. Three years on I am just starting to get my finances in order, although I am still 10 to 15 years behind where I should be at my age.

I have been saving every penny I could over the last three years and I am now in a position where I am looking at buying my own house. Nothing big, nothing flash but a house where I can comfortably live. The thought of marrying again and giving a woman the opportunity to steal it away from me because she fancies getting on the carousel again brings me out in a cold sweat.

I am currently 43 and it was hard starting from scratch again at the age of 40 although I just about have enough time to turn it all around. Going though another divorce at 50 and losing it all again would mean me renting a crappy apartment for the rest of my life.

Plus marriage is a daily miserable grind where you are sent out to the plantation while she spends all your money, does nothing to help and is constantly looking for a new exciting chad.

For women, everything eventually boils down to Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks.

[AwakenedParticipant 35201]

Won'tGetFooledAgain wrote:

Plus marriage is a daily miserable grind where you are sent out to the plantation while she spends all your money, does nothing to help and is constantly looking for a new exciting chad.

Why ANYBODY thinks it will be better than the last time is beyond me. It will be different, probably worse, but chances of it being much/any better are doubtful. Even if it turns out “some what better”, Isn’t “some what better” of a bad situation still bad ?? I just don’t get it, and the older I get, the less I can UNDERSTAND anyone’s desire to marry again.

In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash

[OgreParticipant 5863]

Unless she switches teams, it takes a man willing to marry her to even make multiple divorces a possibility.

I say let that man be some other man. If he can’t see the writing on the wall I can’t help him. If the NAWALT Unicorn is out there somewhere, it won’t take the form of a divorced woman. I’m still firmly in the long extinct camp of cryptozoologists myself.

I’m sorry but fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me is in full effect.

I failed to realize in my youth that I was the prize. I was going to work. I was going to earn. Little did I realize that due to feminism, that no longer meant I had to share. Road soon, Desert after.

[BeerParticipant 11832]

Won'tGetFooledAgain wrote:

I am currently 43 and it was hard starting from scratch again at the age of 40 although I just about have enough time to turn it all around. Going though another divorce at 50 and losing it all again would mean me renting a crappy apartment for the rest of my life.

Definitely man…this was a huge red pill for me in life. When I was in my early 20s I thought I’d get married. Of course I wasn’t making a ton of money and didn’t have all that much to lose should the marriage not work out. If I married at 23 and divorced at 28…maybe it would have cost me 10-20k, but in the grand scheme of life it really wouldn’t have been that big of a deal…not much lost and plenty of time to recover.

Now I’m 32…I’m making more money, and I’ve had more time in the work force to accumulate wealth and assets. Let’s say I marry at 33 and divorce at 38…it would end up costing me several hundred thousand dollars, plus I have less time to recover. The concept that losing xxxx dollars in a divorce directly correlates to having to working xx more years of my life away is very real.

The crappy apartment thing is very true as well. I have a coworker who is pulling in six figures. He’s still on the exes mortgage…she claims the bank won’t let her refi because she doesn’t make enough, and he doesn’t want the kids to have to change school so he can’t push the issue in court for another 7 or 8 years until his youngest graduates. In the mean time after factoring in his child support/alimony, and what he is left to live on, his debt to income ratio is so bad he’s having a hard time qualifying for a mortgage, even though a mortgage on a condo around here works out to be cheaper than his rent, and to top it off he doesn’t really make enough to save any significant amount for retirement either. When the f~~~ing finally ends he’s going to be pushing 50 living in an apartment with a token amount in his 401k, just to find himself in a position where he’s still f~~~ed because he’s going to have to play catch up with his retirement funds at that point or live of SS in retirement. Its just nuts someone with such a successful career could get f~~~ed over so hard in a divorce can end up with such a low net worth for his standard of living…had he just stayed single and kidless and lived his whole life like he does now he probably would already be a millionaire.

[Won'tGetFooledAgainParticipant 3293]

Beer wrote:

The crappy apartment thing is very true as well. I have a coworker who is pulling in six figures. He’s still on the exes mortgage…she claims the bank won’t let her refi because she doesn’t make enough, and he doesn’t want the kids to have to change school so he can’t push the issue in court for another 7 or 8 years until his youngest graduates. In the mean time after factoring in his child support/alimony, and what he is left to live on, his debt to income ratio is so bad he’s having a hard time qualifying for a mortgage, even though a mortgage on a condo around here works out to be cheaper than his rent, and to top it off he doesn’t really make enough to save any significant amount for retirement either. When the f~~~ing finally ends he’s going to be pushing 50 living in an apartment with a token amount in his 401k, just to find himself in a position where he’s still f~~~ed because he’s going to have to play catch up with his retirement funds at that point or live of SS in retirement. Its just nuts someone with such a successful career could get f~~~ed over so hard in a divorce can end up with such a low net worth for his standard of living…had he just stayed single and kidless and lived his whole life like he does now he probably would already be a millionaire.

This is a lot more common than you think, women don’t seem to understand mortgages and debt, they just think they get given the house and never have to pay a penny towards it. Just because your wife fancies a bit of carousel excitement it means the husband is essentially financially f~~~ed for the rest of his life. How is it fair that a woman is rewarded with a house and money for being a slut, while the man is essentially living in poverty no matter how much he earns.

This is the part that men don’t seem to understand when they spend 5 minutes signing that marriage contract. That contract you didn’t think twice about signing has a very good chance of f~~~ing up the rest of your life.

Because of the reasons above I am still on the mortgage of the marital home and it has totally f~~~ed up my chances of buying a house easily. I earn a good salary, have 50% deposit and when I say my salary to the mortgage brokers they initially tell me I will have no problem borrowing the money. As soon as I mention I am still on the ex wife’s mortgage they turn around and tell me I have no chance.

The only way I am able to buy a property is with a Buy To Let mortgage. This means I am buying the house as an investment, I am not allowed to live in it for a minimum of two years. This is the only way I am going to be able to own a property right now.

All the while my ex wife works part time, lives with her new wallet in a house that is worth 35 times her salary. Last time I saw her she was talking about getting a brand new car as her current one is nearly three years old.

I earn 3 times what she does, don’t own a car, save every single non essential penny and am struggling to buy a small house.

You would have to be mental to get married there days.

For women, everything eventually boils down to Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks.

[AwakenedParticipant 35201]

Beer wrote:

had he just stayed single and kidless and lived his whole life like he does now he probably would already be a millionaire.

This pain is felt, lived, and endured by many men.

In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash

[Author]

Posts