Home › Forums › Men’s and Father’s Rights › MRAs Confuse Me Sometimes
This topic contains 4 replies, has 5 voices, and was last updated by Anonymous 4 years, 4 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
So, I’m on a page called “Men’s Rights Initiative”, which posted an article about how news articles refer to men as “predators” and women as simply “seductresses.”
That’s all fine and everything until I got to the stupid comments where a woman’s comment was the following:
“What is the Men’s Rights view on Gay Men? Or Trans Men? I’m curious as what the group’s attitude is towards those guys.”
A man responded with:
“If they class themselves as men they are no different. Obviously if a transgender person sees themselves as a woman then they’re seen as a woman by everyone. So their rights come under female I’d imagine 🙂 ”
I have a few questions here.
1) Why does this woman commenting care to get an answer (if that makes sense)?
2) Do the men on these pages NOT get a little suspicious of “women that become men?” I may sound a little harsh, but from the lesbians/women that want to look like men I’ve experienced, most of them are out to be competition for guys, and that’s about it. They can be attracted to women as well, but they’re looking to also use their “I’m a female and I can emotionally relate to you so sleep with me” card.
Anonymous1MRA’s are trying to be as pc as possible. They are trying not to scare the “womyn”.
That is the advantage of Mgtow: we don’t give a f~~~! 😀
My take is the MRM is for people who need to be included in group-think, like the men in the pictures in this thread: /forums/topic/1-10-1000-10000/
Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?
1) Why does this woman commenting care to get an answer (if that makes sense)?
“What is the Men’s Rights view on Gay Men? Or Trans Men? I’m curious as what the group’s attitude is towards those guys.”
In this question, the person asking already has the assumption that FTM trans are men to begin with. This, in all likelihood, is a direct question that has the intent of fishing for a response that a feminist can pick apart and use to criticize, denigrate, and ultimately use as a example to invalidate the position of MRA’s. If it isn’t an attempt to get someone to give a non PC response, then this person could possibly be a person that is just curious, a FTM trans and wants to see if they are included/accepted, or a college student doing research for a social science paper. You may be surprised to see how often that this is true.
2) Do the men on these pages NOT get a little suspicious of “women that become men?” I may sound a little harsh, but from the lesbians/women that want to look like men I’ve experienced, most of them are out to be competition for guys, and that’s about it. They can be attracted to women as well, but they’re looking to also use their “I’m a female and I can emotionally relate to you so sleep with me” card.
There is always suspicion when someone claims to be part of a social demographic but isn’t viewed as such by a majority or a vocal minority. This is psychology 101. The lesbians/women that want to look like men (Dikes) are traditionally more aggressive and protective of their female herd so to speak. They wouldn’t act this way if they didn’t feel that you represented some sort of threat to their relationship or felt the need to protect their women from interacting with men. In their own way, they are “White Knights” trying to protect their little princesses. The whole “I’m a female and I can relate better etc, is similar to the argument that gay men have made when trying to make time with a straight men that will sit still for five minutes. This isn’t all inclusive in so far as my experience with homosexual men, just those that are seeking some sort of validation for their sexual orientation or have the opinion that all men are gay to some extent. They just need to be shown how good things are on the other side of the fence.
"I asked you a question. I didn't ask you to repeat what the voices in you head are telling you" ~ Me. ........Yes I'm still angry.
Anonymous12If you look at any “Equal Rights Group” they all start off as friendly, lets use the one that effects us the most here Women/Feminists, it started off innocently enough now all these decades on they have supremacy and they want more.
You have to make friends with your enemy first to creep into sympathies, from there on as you increase in power you can get more obvious.
So a smart move I think.
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678