The Divorce Revolution Has Bred An Army Of Woman Haters
(Incoming wall of text, brace, brace, brace…) 🙂
To be fair Mr. Wilcox, how could you not expect such a reaction throughout the videosphere. Did you not perform due diligence and research the content and biases of the internet videosphere? Given your background, I would have to say that the video was designed with the biases of the internet videosphere in mind to garner as much attention as possible. After all the person who desires attention will most certainly achieve that if they scream “FIRE!” in a darkened theater. So in short you have achieved your end in garnering our attention. You may wish you hadn’t but you have our attention.
In your video the very title alone asks that we should “Man up” as if the pinnacle of “manhood” is getting married. Well then I ask you, name 5 men of significance in history who’s only notable achievement was getting married and having children. I’ll wait. Lets change the title of your video a bit while you mull that over. “Be Male, Get Married”, or “Be Male, submit to your biologic pair-bonding needs.” You see, as you know, being a “Man” has a host of cultural and sociological information attributed to it beyond the basic gender of “Male”. But since you have a PhD you also knew that and chose the most troll-bait title you possibly could to garner even more attention as you make your case for men to submit to women and get married to assuage your desperate traditionalist bias.
I have some sad news for you. A Man (under whatever culture he ascribes to) is DEFINED by his ACTIONS, NOT only by his biologic gender. Throughout history MEN are noted for their actions and deeds because these are what leave marks on history, not if they married. If we were to really “Man Up” we would invent some novel new technology, conquer a nation or cure cancer. Biology dictates that we as humans are predisposed to pair bonding and organizing family / extended family / tribal affiliations. That is necessary for the continuation of our species.
However, over the last 100 years western culture and society has slowly moved towards suicidal gynocentrism. Most of this occurring in the last 70 years with women voting based on the emotional needs and desires of their gender rather than logic and reason. This has not worked out as well as they felt it would and the western world is on the fast track to cultural suicide.
Men today are waking up to the fact that they have no significant marital or reproductive rights. All laws and the very “institution” of marriage have been consumed by gynocentrism. Men are realizing that the ONLY choice they have is to not participate. Those that have and are left picking up the wreckage of their lives are the ones you accuse of misogyny. You should rather consider their anger to be the canary in the coal mine indicating that there is something seriously wrong with how men are being treated by the institution of marriage. But in your view considering that women could share in this problem is misogynistic. Time to “man up” and have everything you valued taken from you.
Mr. Wilcox, rather than spend time attempting to poorly troll-click-bait the internet videosphere, perhaps your time would be better spent engaging the millennial generation. Truly, they may be the ones that horrify you and your traditionalist camp the most. It is estimated that the marriage rate may drop to 70 percent. This will be driven by our gynocentric society as men decide that they cannot take the risk.
Perhaps you could ask women to losen their strangle hold on reproductive rights, custody and marriage rights. No?- I thought not. So much easier to attempt shaming tactics on men. However, we are MGTOW. We eat shaming language like tic tacs. Have to up your game Mr. Wilcox. Thank you for playing, please try again.
It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion, it is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shaking, the shaking becomes a warning; it is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion.
Frank V. 3 years, 8 months ago.
