Mother hens want more federal(cough! mens) Money

Topic by MGTOWmonkey aka No More Fucks To Give

MGTOWmonkey aka No More Fucks To Give

Home Forums MGTOW Central Mother hens want more federal(cough! mens) Money

This topic contains 12 replies, has 11 voices, and was last updated by Sidecar  sidecar 4 years, 6 months ago.

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #95017
    +3

    http://miami.cbslocal.com/2015/08/05/bush-stumbles-on-womens-health-care-funding-comments/

    This election is turning into a damn circus,im going to sink in my cave and you guys alert me when its over!

    Never lose sight of what brought you here.

    #95082
    +4
    Fermat
    Fermat
    Participant
    3478

    Women will make mistakes on birth control then seek higher authorities to fix their problems. Abortion clinics are not an exercise of female reproductive rights. It’s another way women are siphoning money from the government to gather resources via victimization.

    I have discovered a truly remarkable list of reasons why women are not necessary for a happy life, but alas this margin is too small to contain it.

    #95096
    +4
    Russky
    Russky
    Participant
    13503

    Abortion is the first step in dehumanization. Next up – euthanasia of old / sick / poor people.
    dehumanization paves way for depopulation

    proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

    #95104
    +1
    Umbreon
    Umbreon
    Participant
    152

    Elections are always a circus. People get opinionated: it’s human nature. This election is already full of raging stupid and the train wreck is just starting. Now, on to the idea of funding planned parenthood…

    Fun fact: You can get cheap/free vasectomies from “women’s health” centers like Planned Parenthood as well as cheap/free STD testing and free condoms. Calling them “women’s health” facilities is a huge misnomer. They’re great for sexually active men and I wish more guys knew about this.

    As to the women, honestly, I look at it from a long-term standpoint. Which is cheaper: one flat fee to let the stupid slut get an abortion/tubes tied, a few bucks a month of birth control/condoms, or paying for the life of some welfare brat? This is why people rage about defunding Planned Parenthood. Unless there’s better programs to replace it, eliminating places like Planned Parenthood actually is a ton more expensive than keeping them open.

    The low-income preggers woman will go to state-paid for medical centers many times through the pregnancy (each session is more expensive than an abortion), the birth itself costs thousands of dollars alone (and that’s if nothing goes wrong), and the new brat will also need food, education, and health care all of which will naturally be paid by the state as the mom was low income. The new mom will also need a larger place to sleep for her and the kid, which will make our ghettos bigger. If something went wrong with the kid then we get to pay for the expensive hospital and surgery fees, a lifetime of medication, and special classes and disability perks for the rest of the kid’s life.

    On top of it all she will NEVER make enough money to support herself and the kid because “the kid takes up all her time.” Show me a successful single mom who never sapped money off an ex-husband and/or the government I’ll show you a true unicorn. In her old age we’ll have to pay for her care as well as she never saved up for her old age due to the kid taking all her money (kids are really, really expensive. No joke).

    And the kid will be poorly raised as the overworked mom will just plain not get it right. Unwanted kids make up the majority of our criminals. If they don’t end up in jail, the kid will likely have kids before they’re 18 which will continue the cycle even faster.

    All of this could be stopped by common services in women’s health centers: education, birth control, condoms and abortion.

    As long as men want sex with women then women will get pregnant. At least with women’s health centers there’s an option to prevent things from being much, much more expensive.

    Beauty fades, dumb is forever.

    #95107
    Russky
    Russky
    Participant
    13503

    There is no need to kill babies. With declining aging populations of sick, infertile and lazy females – all of the aborted kids could have been adopted
    And bringing them up (whatever the expense) does not cost society or economy – it benefits them both

    I used to be of a very different opinion, just like you, Umbreon, so I completely understand where’re you coming from

    proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

    #95133
    +1
    Umbreon
    Umbreon
    Participant
    152

    @RusskyKGB
    The problem is that there is only one country where depopulation is an serious problem right now: Japan.
    The USA doesn’t have this problem.

    The price of unwanted kids is both societal and financial. The vast majority of unwanted kids in the USA are just silently kept by the unhappy parents and not adopted out. This is due to a mix of guilt and hormones leading to kids raised by unfit parents and paid for by the government. The parents of unwanted kids typically are bad parents and poorly raised kids are not helpful in growing a better country as they often have kids at really young ages or turn to crime. Besides, we pay a ton of money for parents to keep their kids and almost nothing for them to give them up so there’s no incentive for them to give the kids up once they’re born as the parents are being paid to be miserable and badly “raise” the kids.

    If all the kids were taken away from bad parents and raised to not suck and the population wasn’t already over 7 billion then tons of kids wouldn’t be such a problem, but that’s not the case. Forcibly taking kids from parents isn’t considered ethical unless the parents were abusive or junkies and that’s only a small fraction of the bad parents out there. Finding and removing all the kids from bad parents and finding good homes for every one of them is not likely due to people whining about their “right” to have and keep kids no matter what, the astronomical cost of detection and enforcement, and the fact that most decent parents just have biological kids instead and never adopt.

    We also have seven times the population we had just a hundred years ago. The world can’t sustain growth like this. Can you picture a world with over 49 billion humans within your lifetime? Something has got to give… one way or another…

    As to aging females adopting, it’s not likely as most people are trained to think that related babies are superior to adopting. Aging, sick and infertile women just get fertility treatments. Sick women have kids that are also sick but they don’t care as “related babies are superior” and we’ll pay her money if the baby comes out disabled. The women most likely to adopt are the ones who don’t want anything to do with men. The single aging females who don’t want anything to do with men are often femstoppo. Do we really want kids raised by these people?

    Birth control doesn’t kill anything as it stops things from meeting up. Condoms don’t kill anything as it prevents things from meeting up. Sterilization doesn’t kill anything as it prevents things from meeting up. Abortion is really controversial so let’s not get into whether it’s killing or not because it will just be argued ad nauseum forever and ever. I just know that there are people who just are better off without kids and they should have easy ways to prevent this.

    All in all preventing just makes more sense than trying to force an impossible cure.

    Beauty fades, dumb is forever.

    #95153
    +1
    ILiveAgain
    ILiveAgain
    Participant

    Male pill please

    #95168
    +2
    RoyDal
    RoyDal
    Participant

    Fun facts. The fact that Planned Parenthood is an abortion mill is no accident.

    Margaret Sanger was one of the founders of Planned Parenthood. Her stated aim was to use eugenics to wipe out “inferior” races along with persons of low intelligence, the mentally ill, and other “human dross.” She was much admired by the Nazis and often quoted in their writings.

    Look up her name, Lothrop Stoddard, and Adolph Hitler in your favorite search engine and see what you get.

    Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

    #95235
    +1
    Mango Ingaway
    Mango Ingaway
    Participant
    2264

    Abortion clinics are not an exercise of female reproductive rights. It’s another way women are siphoning money from the government to gather resources via victimization.

    Meanwhile, when some women lies about being on the pill and the guy gets her pregnant without his consent, he’s told to suck it up and “keep it in his pants next time”. He can also say goodbye to his life for the next 18 years.

    Double standards: check.

    I will also add : feminists who are “proud of having an abortion” make me laugh. What pride is there to it? It only shows that you’re too f~~~ing retarded to take the pill and not be a mindless whore.
    Point and laugh, guys, point and laugh!

    It is a common failing of childhood to think that if one makes a hero out of a demon the demon will be satisfied.

    #95289
    +3

    Anonymous
    3

    Eh, there isn’t much more money to steal from men, not when women are preferentially hired and paid.

    Women will start paying the tax dollars soon enough. Let’s see how much they like their money going to support lazy single mothers. Men are far too simpish to cut off funding, but women don’t suffer from that type of emotional thinking. Women will cut other women and young children off without a moment’s hesitation. The only reason they haven’t already done so is it’s mostly men that were being taxed to this point so they didn’t care.

    #95294
    +1
    Untamed
    Untamed
    Participant

    There we go again with the bushes against the clitons. Feels like a f~~~ing bad deja-vu. And the whole media circus goes on as if we ha’nt been there… before.

     

    Don't let them Blame, Shame or Tame you!
    Give 'em NOTHING, not even an answer!
    #GenderSegragationNow!

    #95321
    +1
    Just a Man
    Just a Man
    Participant
    934

    Abortion is the first step in dehumanization. Next up – euthanasia of old / sick / poor people. dehumanization paves way for depopulation

     

    What do you think the ACA is for, with its deductible on the human body? If you are old and poor you simply will not be able to afford health issues and quietly die off. Logan’s Run, without the political turmoil that would otherwise come with it. Tah-Dah!

    Philosophy, the female repellent

    #95414
    +1
    Sidecar
    sidecar
    Participant
    35841

    Margaret Sanger was one of the founders of Planned Parenthood. Her stated aim was to use eugenics to wipe out “inferior” races along with persons of low intelligence, the mentally ill, and other “human dross.” She was much admired by the Nazis and often quoted in their writings.

    If that’s the case, then it isn’t working.

    The so-called “inferior” people aren’t getting abortions. They’re getting monthly checks.

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.