Most “high quality girls” are high risk STD bearers

[RennieParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

Personally I don’t think any non-virgin is worth marrying, and any woman over say 22 or so. I think women should be married at 16, the way it was in most stable societies.

This^. If they aren’t new, hot and young then it’s not worth it. I’d rather adopt an alternative lifestyle than take something that didn’t meet expectations.

[hellraiderParticipant 2837]

This is why my best friend is a fleshlight, and some day i will marry a sexbot…

[narwhalParticipant]

I get the feeling everyone has a different definition for “high quality girls”. So I’ve got to disagree with the thought that high quality increases the risk of STDs, based on what I think of when I consider high quality.

That said, if high quality means young and very attractive, I would think it would be a little higher then the young and not quite as good looking. I tend to think the highest risk group would be the women who don’t have their stuff together. They work a job that doesn’t provide the life they want for themselves or their kids. Therefore, they are more willing to take a risk or they’re more willing to hold nothing back when trying to find their ATM.

But it’s all speculation. I have no idea.

Ok. Then do it.

[QuellParticipant 2538]

My ex gf had herpes and didn’t tell me until after we had sex 4 times. Luckily for me I wore a condom but still scary stuff to get tested etc… Then she acted like I was the bad guy when I refused to have sex with her again. She said I made an astonished face when she told me and that she couldn’t get that image out of her head that I acted like it was a big deal. Found out from reading her journal that she had also contracted chlamydia a few months before meeting me and gave it some guy and then blame it on him after he told her that he had to go to the doctor. I asked her why she never used condoms and she said it “wasn’t passionate and in the moment”. Women are horrible creatures.

[Author]

Posts