"Most Guys are Losers"

[Jim01Participant 6678]

Keymaster wrote:

Jackinov wrote:

There are 3 women in that video

The mangina f~~~~~ author understands exactly how to profit from female stupidity and exploits female nature for his own personal gain. It’s actually quite easy and follows a formula.

Obama did it. Oprah did it. The author of Twilight did it. Anyone can do it.

We as MEN have something known as “integrity”, so we don’t really understand why it works at first glance. Like if that piece of s~~~ Twilight book fell out of the sky — already bound and wrapped and ready for sale — I would throw it in the garbage thinking NOBODY would ever read or buy that s~~~. Let alone make it into a film trilogy.

But if you are able to think like a woman and exploit female nature, and there is NO LIMIT to the lies and unscrupulous empty-headed s~~~ you can imagine, the you can make a f~~~ing killing out of their stupidity and empty headed nonsense.

They are sheeple and will buy anything if you belittle a man in the process. Why do you think all fathers and husbands on TV are mindless apologetic morons? To sell s~~~ to women in the commercials. And if they can belittle a man in the commercial… more women will buy it.

Have you ever seen a beer commercial where a woman gets kicked in the t~~~ to sell more of it?

Of course not.
And you never will.

But this is Chinnifer Maniston selling WATER to women as “the smartest , best tasting water there is”…. while belittling men in the process, kicking one in the b~~~~, and casting extreme nerds, geeks and “losers” to try and make her look attractive — even with that manjaw she is sporting.

“Most Guys are Losers” is something women will throw their money at no matter HOW it’s packaged or presented or what it’s selling. Even if it’s f~~~ing WATER that’s really not supposed to taste like anything at all.

great post

and how the f~~~ can one water taste better than another? It is tasteless….but yep – shame men in the video and stupid women will rush out to buy the “best” tasting water

[uchibenkeiParticipant 7965]

so what did I lose? Most women are fat slobs. That’s my definition of a loser; someone who can’t win even if they tried.

I bathe in the tears of single moms.

[Anonymous 1]

I do not take in consideration what people tell me that I am, because their view of me is distorted by years of TV brain washing, or newspaper, or religion, or anything else that turns them into morons. I am what I want to be, 0 f~~~s given about what the other people think.

[xenonParticipant 2007]

I couldn’t watch the video, again, but I did read the link KM posted about his days in the bar scene. Totally believable to me having witnessed much of the same in my years of bar gigging. Pretty much drove me away from clubs entirely. Funny, or not, but women are the best thing to drive a man off women and remain eyes open for the duration. Celebrating a divorce is like celebrating something she likely f~~~ed up herself. Harpy behavior. Woowoo girls. You go gurl culture. All of it is rotten to the core. None for me.

[bigboy83Participant 11312]

He looks like a bitch.

Shit Tested, Cunt Approved.

[Deadly RaverParticipant]

Sandals wrote:

Around 4:30 he admits he watches Sex in the City.

Does anybody know, is this guy married?

Yeah. Said he got divorced and then married again.

I wonder how well that book is selling for him? I hope he at least makes his 30 pieces of silver considering he’ll probably be treated as a traitor amongst his own.

Learn from the past, Control the present, and you will know the Future.

[Anonymous 11]

I’m late to this one due to many ongoing hurricane remediation duties.

This mangina is very odious. I could not even finish watching it due to the overwhelming stench of sub-catfood grade tuna coming forth from him(it/she????).

If “most guys are losers”, then what what would the women who overwhelmingly deign to choose these “losers” over all others be? Yeah, ponder that you mangina/white knighting cowards.

[Anonymous 54]

Keymaster wrote:

anonymousyam wrote:

I need some proof of this one and autographs or photos with said people would be sufficient.

No you don’t. Because that’s not the point of the story and even if it were a lie, it would change nothing.

It was also before digital cameras in every mobile device was the norm. It was even before “texting”. We didn’t know they were coming in advance. Except Prince. He was in the VIP lounge which had curtains and he only stayed for about an hour. It was very hush hush. You couldn’t just reach into your pocket and take a picture of something like you can today. … and besides, it would have been “tacky”.

You don’t need to believe it.

Buddy of mine was working for him at the time of his death. Said he was agreat guy to work for.
I have been around fomous people all my life.It just becomes normal for us.

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

foghornleghorn wrote:

Personally I could care less. The more they think I am a loser the less attention they pay to me. Since I am not a woman, not having the validation of a stranger is no big deal.

Exactly. WE’RE all losers ladies so just leave us alone and go curl up with your tube of ice cream and your cat.

QUESTION: This clown in the video claims to have three daughters—who do you suppose really fathered them?
a) Gardener
b) Postman
c) Milkman
d) Street corner bum holding will work for food sign
e) Turkey baster jammed into nearest pool of random jizz.

[Buller100Participant 2189]

PistolPete wrote:

foghornleghorn wrote:

Personally I could care less. The more they think I am a loser the less attention they pay to me. Since I am not a woman, not having the validation of a stranger is no big deal.

Exactly. WE’RE all losers ladies so just leave us alone and go curl up with your tube of ice cream and your cat.

QUESTION: This clown in the video claims to have three daughters—who do you suppose really fathered them?
a) Gardener
b) Postman
c) Milkman
d) Street corner bum holding will work for food sign
e) Turkey baster jammed into nearest pool of random jizz.

One thing the spoilt entitled c~~~s wont marry any of those,

[UnbelievableyetnotParticipant 512]

If his daughters hear from their own father – that most guys are losers, how do you think they’ll treat most guys? They will act like egocentric sociopaths.

Even the “good men” he talks about are subservient and “coachable” by women he says. So when his daughter hears that, she’ll see him as no better than a slave.

It’s all designed to instill in his daughters that they are the total package, the superior beings, while he is lucky to have her. If he had a son, he’d be telling him “don’t be a loser, don’t be “that guy”. In his worldview the default for men is loser, the default for women is goddess. To him, the man’s role is to “rise” to a position where he serves women. The woman’s role is to not let the “losers” lower her down.

[BadgerParticipant 2277]

Keymaster wrote:

I have it down to such a science now, I can make any groom change his mind on his own wedding day in less than 5 minutes….. and he’ll thank me for it like I’m his new best friend.

Keymaster’s description of bachelorette and other parties extends to all levels of society, from rich to poor. Here is an example from the ultra-rich.

FROM: William D. Zabel. The Rich Die Richer and You Can Too, pages 95-96,

THE UNEXPECTED ISSUE

A distinguished older gentleman – let us call him Patrick Natterson – came to see me at my office. He was in his 70s, tall and elegant, and he told me a story that was extraordinary even after all the stories that I have heard over my many years in the field of trusts and estates. Mr. Natterson came from a different city, and the problems that he wanted to tell me about arise out of the marriage of his niece to a young man approximately a year before our meeting. The niece was from his wealthy established family, and her new husband was a scion from and equally well off clan. Accordingly, the two of them had the weeding of the year in their city, attended by all of the social elite. Both families were delighted that these two beautiful young people were forming a union. After the wedding, they went off on a honeymoon, and when they returned the bride was pregnant. Again, everyone was very pleased. Because she had not intended to pursue a career and there would now be a new young heir to the two great family fortunes.
About nine months thereafter, the baby was born. It was boy, and quite unexpectedly, he was black. Mr. Natterson then told me what had happened. The night before the wedding there had been two parties – a bachelor party and a bachelorette party. At the bachelorette party, a male black dancer had been a participant and had done a striptease for the ladies in attendance (analogous perhaps to what was going on at the bachelor party). Apparently, at some time during that evening, the bride, in a moment of indiscretion, had sexual relations with the black dancer. It was not clear to me, and I did not press the question, whether she had gone off on the honeymoon forgetting the incident because of being very inebriated, or simply thought there was no risk of pregnancy. In any event the dancer was the probable father of the child, although legally, as every law student knows, the husband of the mother was, by law, strongly presumed to be the father.
The human tragedy that followed was devastating. The mother of the bride had a nervous breakdown and required institutional care. The mother of the groom also went into a psychological state of shock. The groom asked the bride for a divorce.

(The rest of the chapter goes on about how to avoid the legal problems of the child being the heir. No mention of what happened to the bride other than the divorce.)

If the dancer/stripper had been white, the bride might have gotten away with it.

[Anonymous 3]

Unbelievableyetnot wrote:

If his daughters hear from their own father – that most guys are losers, how do you think they’ll treat most guys? They will act like egocentric sociopaths.

Even the “good men” he talks about are subservient and “coachable” by women he says. So when his daughter hears that, she’ll see him as no better than a slave.

It’s all designed to instill in his daughters that they are the total package, the superior beings, while he is lucky to have her. If he had a son, he’d be telling him “don’t be a loser, don’t be “that guy”. In his worldview the default for men is loser, the default for women is goddess. To him, the man’s role is to “rise” to a position where he serves women. The woman’s role is to not let the “losers” lower her down.

It drives away the true good men that refuse to be bothered and sense how rigged society has made things. Good men have no interest in being treated as bad men, savaged from every angle and rendered powerless and subservient to an inferior creature.

And rest assured, that is what women are. Women seek superior men as mates, and ultimately do wish to submit to said men, but modern society has them rebel against that natural programming. And also keeps these men from wanting anything to do with them.

A woman might scream that she is equal, and she will instead think she is superior to her male co-workers. But her boss, she gets tingles from him and knows he is better than her and the rest of the workers.

[FreedomParticipant 295]

Guys are Losers, you say? Sounds like shame. Bring it on.

What is your criteria for winning?

Successfully sacrificing one’s desires to make a woman happy instead? Yes, I am a loser, then.
Successfully sleeping with every woman one meets? Yes, I am a loser then.
Successfully rejecting masculine traits and adopting feminine ones instead? LOSER HERE!

How about this…

Self-actualizing through activities that build up one’s own mind, body, and spirit. Bonding with morally-upright, competent, and reliable friends for life. Making money and wisely saving it up for a good retirement.

Winner.

It is wise to fear dangerous commitments.

[TriviumParticipant 1029]

This is one of those things you can just own. Like when women started calling themselves bitches like it was a batch of honor when in fact they were just being c~~~s about being bitches.

Most married men I know wish they could ‘lose’ their woman. I am starting to get a lot of snarky and envious comments when I tell them I spent all weekend working on my car, gaming till late at night or just grabbing a good book, sitting outside with a beer and just reading.

They don’t even have the time or permission to do what they want those lucky winners.

As always it seems to me as if women are just projecting their own mental state onto others. They can’t have you, therefore they lose out on a man so you must be the ‘loser’ and not the loss. A perception of reality based on ‘feelz’ rather than any kind of rationality written entirely around the perspective that the universe revolves solely around them.

The amusing part is they can’t even see that the guy is making money off of stroking their egos. No self-respecting man will ever read sludge like that… even the manual for your fridge has more depth than can be said on the topic of ‘male loserdom’.

"Listen to all, Follow none"

[Bestieboy666Participant 2358]

Well when his daughters reach 35 after riding several hundred c~~~s, find no men to marry them, take a trip to the local cattery, then he might realize that most girls are losers.

Women are so bad, if they changed the law so I kept the house, I still wouldn't marry one. I'd rather be homeless.

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

By the way I consider myself very coachable, good listener and a fast learner – when coaching is done by someone I look up to (a man worthy of my respect). His problem is that he looks up and respects women indiscriminately as a group. He meant something totally different – submissive and agreeable, someone who takes the blame and strives to become a better mangina, someone in more conformance the gynocratic society and the state.
In his eyes to be a winner – is to win a human Westminster dog show contest – to become the best groomed and most obedient dog of them all.
And I agree with him that if you participate in the Westminster show and lose – you are a loser. MGTOW don’t participate in stupid dog shows so we aren’t winners or losers.

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[uchibenkeiParticipant 7965]

is that not bullying language? why is it ok for him to bully us? ha ha ha

I bathe in the tears of single moms.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Badger wrote:

The night before the wedding there had been two parties – a bachelor party and a bachelorette party. At the bachelorette party, a male black dancer had been a participant and had done a striptease for the ladies in attendance

Thanks for posting that. I’m telling you, it happened EVERY WEEKEND. It’s not “rare” by a long shot. By the time I was 28 or so, “marriage” would be completely out of the question. It would be IMPOSSIBLE for me to change my mind on that. Even 8 years later when I gave a “for better or for worse” approach a shot, I predicted her behavior in advance with pin-point precision.

Later, I read that between 10-30% of babies born in America don’t have the father they think they do. Thats’ gotta be a misprint, right? There is just no f~~~ing way! But I think they are being way too generous.

70% of paternity tests in an African city are negative.
http://www.marilynstowe.co.uk/2016/04/04/over-70-per-cent-of-paternity-tests-in-african-city-negative/

Don’t forget, the 10%-30% number in America only pertains to cases where women AGREE to a test. So do the math.

Maybe “Most Guys are Losers”, because “most guys” don’t REALLY know what their woman is up to.
Now that’s a book worth publishing.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Faith+1Participant 866]

He needs to be beaten with a large stick.

[Author]

Posts