More Boo-hooing About Lack of Women In Canadian Science Hall of Fame

Topic by - Deleted on Request -

- Deleted on Request -

Home Forums MGTOW Central More Boo-hooing About Lack of Women In Canadian Science Hall of Fame

This topic contains 15 replies, has 12 voices, and was last updated by - Deleted on Request -  – Deleted on Request – 4 years, 9 months ago.

Viewing 16 posts - 1 through 16 (of 16 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #49332
    +1
    #49336
    +1

    Anonymous
    1

    What is this obsession of women with gaps?

    Geez…

    #49347
    +1
    Governor Megachris%
    Governor Megachris%
    Participant
    3584

    They have an obsession with every kind of gap except for thigh gaps.  They HATE those and shame them.  Heheh

    #49370
    +2
    Dakota
    Dakota
    Participant
    341

    Has anyone ever noticed how:

    …there’s a massive gender gap in the tech industry but computers  are the arguably the greatest innovation in history!  Female programmers are irrelevant.  Who would say, “This Apple/Android device is the biggest POS…I wish women designed it instead.”

    …there’s a massive gender gap in science fields but scientific understanding is light-years ahead of where is was even 100 years ago.  The age of the universe has been calculated and we even took an embryonic picture of it!  All without the help of women.  Weird, huh?

    …there’s a massive gender gap in aerospace, yet MAN (as in MEN) have been to the moon, built a space station, and civilian air travel is as safe as has EVER been.  Women were insignificant in ALL respects.  Who would argue aerospace isn’t great enough?

    Think of any great achievement or discovery currently or in history.  Besides Madam Curie, whose husband Pierre and his physicist friends who spoon-fed her and coddled her all the way through “her discoveries”…yeah, that’d be about it.

    I live near Canada and it is, undoubtedly, the most blue-pill country I’ve ever witnessed.  This article is of no surprise.  Canadians have taken PC to the MAX.  One example would be calling indigenous North Americans “Indians.”  That’s a big no-no in Canada.  They’re “First Nations” tribes/peoples.  And on and on and on…  There is nothing more important to Canadians than forcing equality…even when it’s unequal things being considered.  They won’t stop until there’s a statue of Lenin on every street corner.

    #49374
    +1
    Mango Ingaway
    Mango Ingaway
    Participant
    2264

    They should try filling the gap between their two ears, because honestly that’s the only one that SERIOUSLY needs to be filled, it seems.

    It is a common failing of childhood to think that if one makes a hero out of a demon the demon will be satisfied.

    #49382
    +1
    Puffin Stuff
    Puffin Stuff
    Participant
    24979

    My prediction:

    They will lower the standards for inclusion of otherwise un-noteworthy scientific inductee’s at the Hall of Lame are equal men to women in numbers.

    #icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

    #49389
    +1
    RoyDal
    RoyDal
    Participant

    Maybe if the women had paid attention in their math and science classes — maybe — then they would be admitted to some STEM program or other. You (male or female) can not get a job in a STEM field with a degree in “Something Studies”.

    Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

    #49492

    Dakota:

     

    It’s interesting to note that feminists complain that women are “excluded” from the computing industry but completely overlook the contributions of Admiral Grace Hopper, Ada Lovelace, and the women who programmed the earliest mainframes.

     

    #49527
    +2
    TheBard
    TheBard
    Participant
    974

    Leave it to feminists to consider the gender more important then the achievement lol.

    #49546
    Peterfa
    peterfa
    Participant
    833

    Why can’t they just start their own science things and their own businesses that hire exclusively women? Think of all the government freebies they get just for what they carry between their legs. Think of the massive media coverage.

    Why don’t they just go ahead and try? Why can’t they just prove they really are superior?

    #49585
    ILiveAgain
    ILiveAgain
    Participant

    Why can’t they just start their own science things and their own businesses that hire exclusively women? Think of all the government freebies they get just for what they carry between their legs. Think of the massive media coverage. Why don’t they just go ahead and try? Why can’t they just prove they really are superior?

    and there is the problem for them. They cant do it on their own. They need to ride on the backs of men. For all the equality bulls~~~ and all the ‘women are smarter’ then men …….. they just cant follow their s~~~ up with actions.

    Women wait in the wings until men have made things so safe, easy and automated then they jump on it shouting how clever they are.

    Idiots with power.

    #49590
    KingOfTheSea
    KingOfTheSea
    Participant
    1270

    Leave it to feminists to consider the gender more important then the achievement lol.

    To be fair, we’re talking about the gender that criticized the man who landed a damn spacecraft on a comet for the first time in human history because of a shirt.

    #49674
    Jim01
    Jim01
    Participant
    6678

    Has anyone ever noticed how: …there’s a massive gender gap in the tech industry but computers are the arguably the greatest innovation in history! Female programmers are irrelevant. Who would say, “This Apple/Android device is the biggest POS…I wish women designed it instead.” …there’s a massive gender gap in science fields but scientific understanding is light-years ahead of where is was even 100 years ago. The age of the universe has been calculated and we even took an embryonic picture of it! All without the help of women. Weird, huh? …there’s a massive gender gap in aerospace, yet MAN (as in MEN) have been to the moon, built a space station, and civilian air travel is as safe as has EVER been. Women were insignificant in ALL respects. Who would argue aerospace isn’t great enough? Think of any great achievement or discovery currently or in history. Besides Madam Curie, whose husband Pierre and his physicist friends who spoon-fed her and coddled her all the way through “her discoveries”…yeah, that’d be about it. I live near Canada and it is, undoubtedly, the most blue-pill country I’ve ever witnessed. This article is of no surprise. Canadians have taken PC to the MAX. One example would be calling indigenous North Americans “Indians.” That’s a big no-no in Canada. They’re “First Nations” tribes/peoples. And on and on and on… There is nothing more important to Canadians than forcing equality…even when it’s unequal things being considered. They won’t stop until there’s a statue of Lenin on every street corner.

    that women scientist who complained about the bloke who had just landed a probe on a comet’s shirt should go on that as a permanent reminder as how irrelevant women are to the actual workings of science

    #49675
    +1
    Jim01
    Jim01
    Participant
    6678

    Leave it to feminists to consider the gender more important then the achievement lol.

    To be fair, we’re talking about the gender that criticized the man who landed a damn spacecraft on a comet for the first time in human history because of a shirt.

    lol you beat me to it – I should go through a whole thread before posting!

    #49704
    +1
    Dakota
    Dakota
    Participant
    341

    I usually read about tech news from Cnet but lately they’ve swallowed a whole bottle of blue-pills and have joined arm-in-arm with Jesse Jackson and his listless Rainbow Coalition [please Lord, drop a piano on this simp…] by overloading their site with Chicken Little articles about how the sky is falling because women in tech represent only (only!) 30% of the work force.  Cnet’s new holy-war is called Solving for XX (as in chromosomes).

    Direct quote from the article…   http://www.cnet.com/news/women-arent-the-problem-in-tech-land/?ftag=YHRbd38a98

    “But by 2012, only 14 percent of engineers were women. Worse, almost 40 percent of women with engineering degrees either quit or don’t even enter the field, according to researchers from the University of Wisconsin-Madison.”

    The fact is women don’t give a s~~~ about STEM. If given the choice, they choose other.  If you want more women in STEM than would naturally choose to do it, you have to physically pick them up and carry them to the job and sit them in the seat and tell them which keys to type…which if you’ve been paying attention over the past year, is exactly what tech companies, the media, venture capitalists and universities are doing with their new found religious zeal.  When was the last time men were picked up and carried to a job outside of the frontlines of war?  Women get more and more pathetic everyday.

    #49768

    Dakota:

     

    I had a number of women in the technical courses I taught as a post-secondary instructor.  Sadly, the majority were like you described.  They behaved as if some counselor told them “you can do this”, and went ahead and enrolled, a lack of natural talent or personal determination being completely irrelevant.

     

    I naturally gravitated to engineering partly because of the early space program, but also because I was naturally curious and took things apart just to see what was inside.  It also helped that my father was a tradesman and I learned a lot about how things worked simply by watching him fix things.

     

    Damn it all, why don’t high school and vocational counselors get this?

     

Viewing 16 posts - 1 through 16 (of 16 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.