Home › Forums › MGTOW Central › Milo destroys a feminist muslim in Australia NICE
Tagged: Clementine Ford, debate, Milo
This topic contains 23 replies, has 18 voices, and was last updated by blade 2 years, 2 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
Just nothing more gratifying than watching milo f~~~ up idiots like this women . If ya want to call it that .
Dump this bitch in malmo
AUSSIE MAN WOMAN C~~~
Clip runs 10:54
THE PLANTATION HAS NOW TURNED INTO THE KILLING FIELDS . WOMAN ARE NOW ROLLING CAMBODIAN STYLE .
Hahahaha ohhh milo.
This guy is funny as f~~~.
To those following me, be careful, I just farted. Men those beans are killers.
“Muslim” “feminist” ??
That’s like dry water.
Milo is a BOSS ! Much respect for him.
She’s clearly not a Muslim, she doesn’t even know the ‘five pillars’ of her own faith.
She’s clearly not a Muslim, she doesn’t even know the ‘five pillars’ of her own faith.
She also shows way too much skin to be a proper Muslim.
Marriage: About as appealing as wood-chipper diving.
Fukn Rekt…. cue thug meme
Afinogyny.. from the Greek Afino {to abandon/ to set down/ to leave /to allow/ to let } + Gyny {Women} MGHOW’s philosophy to not engage women without “hating them”. Narcorca =Narcissistic Orca typically spouting to a bathroom mirror taking an arms length selfie ; Wallinate describes post wall females whose SMV is terminally negligible New Years resolution "To not make women happy" . Instadestitue: yet another Neologism for Men that cohabit with women that decide to pull the handle of intervention orders.
Going to see him Dec 1
A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!
Going to see him Dec 1
F~~~ i wish i could . Enjoy bro
THE PLANTATION HAS NOW TURNED INTO THE KILLING FIELDS . WOMAN ARE NOW ROLLING CAMBODIAN STYLE .
First f~~~~~ I’ve liked in my entire life, and that says a lot.
Don't let them Blame, Shame or Tame you!
Give 'em NOTHING, not even an answer!
#GenderSegragationNow!Notice how she tried to evade every question, seeking refuge in arm waving and generalities. The harder she was pressed, the louder she became.
A perfect example of feelz = facts.
If you were to ask any c~~~ in the audience, they would have said how ‘right’ she was. But if you asked any of those c~~~s what she had actually said, they couldn’t tell you.
Anonymous0She also shows way too much skin to be a proper Muslim.
Read above
Let’s see now:
Arguing publicly with a man. Punishment…Public whipping
Showing too much bare skin. Punishment…Public whipping.
Working a job. Punishment..Don’t know, would never happen.
No headscarf in public…Don’t know
Being annoying……Don’t know
Embarrassing her family….One way trip to Afghanistan.Oh yeah, she’s really Muslim.
If you are going to take on Milo, you had better know your stuff, because he does.
Anonymous3First f~~~~~ I’ve liked in my entire life, and that says a lot.
I’m not about to cheer some f~~~~~ on. I think the feminists and liberals and f~~~~~s can all go f~~~ each other in some sort of orgy somewhere, as long as it’s far away from me.
She got rekt like
Learn from the past, Control the present, and you will know the Future.
She is only muslim in the sense that it is her family heritage. It’s really not that surprising, as it’s quite common with Christians as well. I would suspect it’s common for any religion really.
You’ll meet people every day in the West who claim to Christian, or more specifically of denomination, yet haven’t been to a church or read a bible in forever. They do believe in God and subscribe their morals as based on their faith, yet can’t really tell you where the bible and their own beliefs are in contradiction.
I’m not really knocking people like this at all. I could easily be classified this way myself. It just seems like there needs to be better classifications for those that practice and those that just have family heritage and want to feel good about it. Instead, they want to straddle the fence and be both a muslim/Christian and be fully a part of society and whatever views it currently holds.
Ok. Then do it.
Anonymous3She is only muslim in the sense that it is her family heritage. It’s really not that surprising, as it’s quite common with Christians as well. I would suspect it’s common for any religion really.
You’ll meet people every day in the West who claim to Christian, or more specifically of denomination, yet haven’t been to a church or read a bible in forever. They do believe in God and subscribe their morals as based on their faith, yet can’t really tell you where the bible and their own beliefs are in contradiction.
I’m not really knocking people like this at all. I could easily be classified this way myself. It just seems like there needs to be better classifications for those that practice and those that just have family heritage and want to feel good about it. Instead, they want to straddle the fence and be both a muslim/Christian and be fully a part of society and whatever views it currently holds.
I’d say the vast majority are like that. They use their religion as moral authority too try and manipulate others, very few people submit to and follow what the religion itself says and change themselves to reflect it rather than doing the reverse and changing all the scripture/principles to fit their own ends.
In the West and really around the world today that usually means gynocentry, most religions are completely feminist. Pretty much all religion and all philosophy is the complete opposite. A way of life with masculinity at the front, because that was the only way to build society in the first place. Feminism destroys society, but that means it can’t even exist until society is made first. It’s easy to destroy things, many ways to destroy things really. There’s usually only one way to build something right however.
I don’t disagree. However, I don’t want to knock people that aren’t devout to their religions. It is very difficult to do so when society and the very institutions of your religion are not devout. Nor does it mean that you’re a ‘bad person’. The world is troubled. Always has been, always will be. I doubt there was ever a time when all women or men behaved as they should…whatever that even means.
Ok. Then do it.
just seems like there needs to be better classifications for those that practice and those that just have family heritage and want to feel good about it.
The ones who go by the book (fundamentalists) are the radicals.
“Radical” Islam using violence to conquer is actually fundamental. “Radical” Christianity calling sinners to repentance is fundamental.
Society is backwards. Logic and truth doesn’t matter in society. You can claim to be a part of whatever belief you want and have no knowledge of it whatsoever.
I have yet to see some fundamental radical atheists who were actually consistent with their beliefs.
Milo had me at “you’re not submitting to God, you’re submitting to stupid”. Amen! Lol
Don't care
I was laughing at her so hard watching this.
If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678