MGTOW Paris Climate Summit

[Blue SkiesParticipant 15665]

so many countries want to fight climate change, paris climate summit going on now… The biggest cause is overpopulation. there are 7.38 billion people on this planet. MGTOW will certainly lower birth rates, and lower population…… MGTOW is a good method for slowing climate change… The governments of developed countries are always pro feminism because there are more women voters than men…. Therefore they will never support MGTOW, and thus climate change issues will not be fixed……Are there any MGTOWs or conservatives who care about the climate change issue or do most of you think this is bulls~~~?

MGTOW is not a movement, it is a way of life.

[ResidentEvil7Participant 9544]

I don’t believe in climate change. This Earth is billions of years old, and the temperatures always fluctuate over the years. Some years it’s cooler than warmer. I believe the Earth goes through weather cycles, and climate isn’t controlled my man. Besides with all that’s going on the world and here in America, I think following the climate change myth shouldn’t be top priority. By the way, according the Bernie Sanders (I-VT), the Paris attacks was caused by climate change; more reasons to vote out Democrats. How do they link terrorism to climate change is beyond me.

https://themanszone.webs.com/

[bobphiloParticipant 1772]

ResidentEvil7 wrote:

ResidentEvil7Participant 46

I don’t believe in climate change. This Earth is billions of years old, and the temperatures always fluctuate over the years. Some years it’s cooler than warmer. I believe the Earth goes through weather cycles, and climate isn’t controlled my man. .

You seem to contradict yourself. You don’t believe in climate change but you admit that the climate has changed throughout Earth’s history. Which is it? Do you doubt that man has been able to bring about dramatic changes in nature. The polar ice caps are melting and the sea level is rising all over the world. This is well documented.
A corporate group once offered thousands of dollars to any scientist willing to deny climate change with no takers. Shortly after scientists signed a declaration to the UN that we must do something to stop global warming without getting a cent.

[Blue SkiesParticipant 15665]

I do believe in climate change because 97% of scientists agree. the other 3% are bribed by corporations and oil companies. The atmosphere of the earth is very thin compared to the volume of the earth, and all the greenhouse gases can change climate. The harm caused by climate change is nature’s way of controlling the world’s population. Floods, storms, tornados………..

MGTOW is not a movement, it is a way of life.

[RoyDalParticipant]

Here is an opposing view to global warming:

The New Ice Age
By: Scott Yarbrough
http://www.thenewiceage.net/

I do believe the climate changes. All sorts of geological records prove this. In fact it was warmer at the end of the last Ice Age than it is now.

I do not believe in man-made climate change. Our input is a tiny fraction of the titanic forces involved.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[Crazy CanuckMember 4215]

Climate change is a myth and it’s been proven. There are natural cycles in temperature on earth. In fact in past there was climate change. Climate change is used by the bankers to tax us with carbon tax and make themselves rich with green energy which doesn’t do much.

"If pussy was a stock it would be plummeting right now because you've flooded the market with it. You're giving it away too easy." - Dave Chapelle

[bobphiloParticipant 1772]

Crazy Canuck wrote:

Climate change is a myth and it’s been proven. There are natural cycles in temperature on earth. In fact in past there was climate change. Climate change is used by the bankers to tax us with carbon tax and make themselves rich with green energy which doesn’t do much

Climate change has been most definitely been proven, How do you account for the rise in ocean levels and melting of the polar ice caps? Our production of greenhouse gasses is responsible for this, or at the very least adds to this. Look at the how the atmosphere of Venus is so hostile to life due to greenhouse gasses. Every reputable scientists knows this. The only people who don’t realize this have been duped by the corporate foulers of our planet who only care about their profits.
Sure, don’t listen to scientists who know what they’re talking about, but big business who only care about their profits. Let yourself be brainwashed by corporate propaganda.

[Blue SkiesParticipant 15665]

RoyDal wrote:

Here is an opposing view to global warming:

The New Ice Age
By: Scott Yarbrough
http://www.thenewiceage.net/

I do believe the climate changes. All sorts of geological records prove this. In fact it was warmer at the end of the last Ice Age than it is now.

I do not believe in man-made climate change. Our input is a tiny fraction of the titanic forces involved.

This guy is a former stock broker. Not even close to a scientist

MGTOW is not a movement, it is a way of life.

[VeniversumParticipant 492]

All of that is fairy tales. There is no overpopulation. What there is, is too many people for the current ruling class to control (or more than they have a use for), and they want to use these ideological systems, and possibly even scientific sterilization techniques as a preventative method for population control in accordance with the philosophy and teachings of Thomas Malthus, as an alternative to WAR which would be a positive check. It’s absurd for anyone to claim that Carbon Dioxide is the problem. It’s what gives life to plants. If anything, increased levels of it should give rise to healthier, and more plants and vegetation. Man *is* tampering with the weather via HAARP, which the military is involved in and the details are prevented from reaching the public. The reason that the ruling class is pushing these agendas so intensely is because they fear obsolescence. They have to manufacture a crisis to justify power grabs, because they know that like all other fiat currency systems in history, this one is going to fail as well. The cities might be overpopulated, due to financial opportunities, but the world is *NOT* overpopulated. There are miles and miles and miles of empty land that could be inhabited. This has nothing to do with weather, it has to do with perpetuating the advantage of the ruling class, the structure of society, and hierarchical systems. It has to do with the end game of global domination by the world central banking cartel, from which all the money is created to fund government projects and the differential advantages of the ruling class. They can’t stand the idea of abundance, because it would mean independence for the people. Scarcity is from where their power is derived. Without it, why should anyone have government? Without conflict, hierarchy is obsolete. God forbid there should be world peace, at least not until they justify creating enough power for themselves to deceive the populace into permanently enslaving themselves for the “greater good”, or “common good”, whichever lie you prefer. When they say society, national security, or the greater or common good, what they really mean is the status of the ruling class.

[VeniversumParticipant 492]

“I frankly think that crisis initiation is really tough.” https://youtu.be/PfoaLbbAix0

[VeniversumParticipant 492]

Oh, and on a side note, I’d like a list of names of the so called 97% of scientists. Anyone can manufacture a statistic or pull a number from their ass.

[bobphiloParticipant 1772]

Veniversum wrote:

Oh, and on a side note, I’d like a list of names of the so called 97% of scientists. Anyone can manufacture a statistic or pull a number from their ass.

No offense but, what rock have you been living under? Just look at any scientific journal. Where do you get your information? The consensus of the scientific community is overwhelming.

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

If people believed 911 they will believe anything, including man-made climate change, aliens,, NAWALTs and Easter bunny

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[VeniversumParticipant 492]

bobphilo wrote:

Veniversum wrote:

Oh, and on a side note, I’d like a list of names of the so called 97% of scientists. Anyone can manufacture a statistic or pull a number from their ass.

No offense but, what rock have you been living under? Just look at any scientific journal. Where do you get your information? The consensus of the scientific community is overwhelming.

Is a scientific journal immune to corruption? I doubt it. Will people do anything for money? Just about. Living under a rock? Ad hominem is unnecessary for people who can construct a reasonable argument. I’ll gladly look at the scientific journal that contains the names of the exact scientists that claim that global warming/climate change is a result of the actions of humans. Show it to me. Waiting. Where do I get what information? If you’d like to dispute anything I have said, let’s hear it, one point at a time. I’ll address any concerns or questions you have.

[RennieParticipant]

I tell ya, it’s Mgtower’s rocket stove.

[uchibenkeiParticipant 7965]

Is there climate change? yes. Is it caused by man? I don’t know.

I read an interesting article about underwater volcanoes in the arctic/Antarctica heating up the oceans in those areas and contributing to melting icecaps. never saw any follow up to that.

I bathe in the tears of single moms.

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

This JD King guy knows what he’s talking about. Here he talks about ice caps and polar bears myths. Too bad I couldn’t link to the documentary itself, because it appears that his YT channel got banned shortly after the linked nightly news show aired., He should have hosted them on his website bluebeatsgreen.com

watch from 36:30 about polar bears and fake environmentalism

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[VeniversumParticipant 492]

That’s about right. There’s a lot more information as well regarding the subject of global politics in the book “The Creature from Jekyll Island”, by G Edward Griffin. Since they know that this time humanity is probably not going to succumb to war, because starting one at this point would be so blatantly false, they are looking for a noble alternative. I give them credit for that. It isn’t scientists shouting about global warming at all. It’s politicians.. and they have much to gain from it. They won’t create any laws that screw up their businesses…what they will do is enforce eugenics through CO2 excuses… and create EVEN MORE taxes on citizens. The ruling class isn’t going to abolish it’s own advantage. It’s hilarious that people are acting as if it’s government versus corporations. Government IS the corporations…and the banks. It’s a single entity via banks and the stock market.. but they can’t enslave us without our cooperation, so they have to beat us over the head telling us what to believe. If they repeat anything enough times, the average person begins to adopt the belief just as if they were raised with religion. The ruling class controls the populace by furnishing to their subjects a specific set of beliefs that benefit the ruling class. Real scientists are skeptical about things until they have absolute proof, and even then they aren’t always 100% certain, and are also sometimes mistaken. People who are capable of independent and critical thinking can tell the difference between science and dogma. Carl Sagan expressed this fact in his book “The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark.”

[QuietlyquietlyParticipant 728]

Blue Skies wrote:

I do believe in climate change because 97% of scientists agree. the other 3% are bribed by corporations and oil companies. The atmosphere of the earth is very thin compared to the volume of the earth, and all the greenhouse gases can change climate. The harm caused by climate change is nature’s way of controlling the world’s population. Floods, storms, tornados………..

bobphilo wrote:

CrazyCanuck wrote:

Climate change is a myth and it’s been proven. There are natural cycles in temperature on earth. In fact in past there was climate change. Climate change is used by the bankers to tax us with carbon tax and make themselves rich with green energy which doesn’t do much

Climate change has been most definitely been proven, How do you account for the rise in ocean levels and melting of the polar ice caps? Our production of greenhouse gasses is responsible for this, or at the very least adds to this. Look at the how the atmosphere of Venus is so hostile to life due to greenhouse gasses. Every reputable scientists knows this. The only people who don’t realize this have been duped by the corporate foulers of our planet who only care about their profits.
Sure, don’t listen to scientists who know what they’re talking about, but big business who only care about their profits. Let yourself be brainwashed by corporate propaganda.

bobphilo wrote:

Veniversum wrote:

Oh, and on a side note, I’d like a list of names of the so called 97% of scientists. Anyone can manufacture a statistic or pull a number from their ass.

No offense but, what rock have you been living under? Just look at any scientific journal. Where do you get your information? The consensus of the scientific community is overwhelming.

Consensus Science is the biggest load of bollocks ever. No scientist needed a whole bunch of other scientists to agree with him to make a point valid, he just needed independently verifiable proof! If consensus science were valid, then the world would still be flat, because EVERYBODY KNEW AND AGREED THE WORLD WAS FLAT!! Bollocks it is.

Climate statistics manipulation
Burying evidence
NIPCC Report
Carbon is good – A Scientist tells us so!

[VeniversumParticipant 492]

Most of the laws will be about separating people from the land, so they have no means of survival outside of the preferred globalist supply chains.

That’s exactly right. That’s why they already criminalized subsistence or otherwise added an artificial cost to it, as well as forcing people to pay rent (land tax) on land that they supposedly own, in order to prevent people from opting out of the economic system, since fiat currency can only have value if the future labor of people is guaranteed. Compulsion of people into servitude even by means of law, is still slavery. Keynesian economics has failed the people miserably, and elevated the ruling class to higher statuses than ever achieved by any previous warlord king in history, not to mention has spurred the largest mass murders of subjects by their rulers in Malthusian depopulation tactics, namely WAR.

[Author]

Posts