MGTOW on Wikipedia

[Binary LogicParticipant 2351]

Just seen a youtube video by Mayor of MGTOWN. He points out that MGTOW now has a Wikipedia entry, however, it is slated for deletion. He touches on the popularity trend and states that it is most likely due to the BBC piece that aired. It is also important to point out that this same page lacks in credibility or insight into the exact nature of MGTOW. I see this as an awesome opportunity to not only raise awareness, but to define MGTOW for the general public. Any thoughts?

Funny, isn't it? How women thrive on a mans time, attention and resources, while simultaneously telling him he isn't enough...

[HimeoParticipant 471]

Inevitable, wikipedia is infested by the SJW crowd.

Not worth bothering with, although it’s fun as hell to watch them change the article, piece by piece. First they castrated it by deleting huge portions of it due to “lack of citations”. Then they added a hell of a lot of content under the “Criticism” section with garbage citations. Then the wiki “Editors” came in and restored parts of it and undid the bulls~~~ the SJW’s did. Then the SJW’s fought back by lobbying that one of the books the original article listed as a source WASN’T a legit source and that the connection to Herbivore Men was not well enough established to be relevant (this removed another huge section of citations based on that well documented movement). The SJW’s succeeded, and then moved to delete the page due to lack of content and merge it with the Manosphere article. Then other “Editors” pointed out that, no, MGTOW is relevant enough to have it’s own page. Then the original article contributor demanded the article be deleted because it was a shell of it’s original… etc.

[GermanicSpectator 35]

Obviously, they’re going to try and demonize MGTOW as much as possible.

I mean, they could have sympathetically written the article about divorce cases, double standards in modern/feminist society, oppression of men, negative portrayal of men, discrimination against men based on sex etc.

But noooooooo!!

[RoyDalParticipant]

The original Wikipedia page is now permanently archived on this site here:

/content/pages/mgtow/

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[Binary LogicParticipant 2351]

Now that, I was not aware of. The SJW crowd having a foothold on the content. In the same token, I’ve considered the idea that being MGTOW is something far more deep then a simple Wikipedia entry. It’s a pivotal point that an individual must reach on their own accord.
Nonentheless, it is gaining momentum. I just read a rather (biased) piece on Vice that quoted one of our regular members here. Ironic in the sense that they seem to chose some of our more brazen content as opposed to the content in some of the more deep discussions we have. A damned tragedy if you ask me. However, I’m not overly worried about it though, in the end, you can downplay, criticize and disapprove of a thing (MGTOW), but when it occurs as a natural progression or response to the way the world operates, the truth of it ultimately cannot be denied.

Funny, isn't it? How women thrive on a mans time, attention and resources, while simultaneously telling him he isn't enough...

[Binary LogicParticipant 2351]

RoyDal… why the !@#$ is that page not the standard?! What happened there?

Funny, isn't it? How women thrive on a mans time, attention and resources, while simultaneously telling him he isn't enough...

[RoyDalParticipant]

Binary Logic wrote:

RoyDal… why the !@#$ is that page not the standard?! What happened there?

I believe it is the shattered remnants of what the Wikipedians call an “editing war.” The SJWs won — the men lost.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

Is there a way to up the real wiki page screenshot in search results so it’s above the wikipedia bulls~~~?

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[AttonParticipant]

while(true)
{
if(pushMGTOWOntoWikipedia() == true)
{
break;
}
}

Keep pushing it

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[Binary LogicParticipant 2351]

It’s ridiculous. So I guess the next question is how do the SJW benefit from misrepresenting what MGTOW is about? Come to think of it, same question goes for BBC? Is it about ratings? The widest dissemination of misinformation? Do they really think MGTOW has the capability to have that massive of an impact?

Funny, isn't it? How women thrive on a mans time, attention and resources, while simultaneously telling him he isn't enough...

[Binary LogicParticipant 2351]

On that level Stealthy, I feel you. Man, I’m a little jealous as I’ve just started my relationship with C, and some of this stuff is a little confusing, Like when to use sentinel values and when not to…and particularly pseudocode.. Yeah I know.. should he easy.. but it’s a little confusing.

And I’m with you when you say you don’t want to see it become a “T-shirt” thing. Or the IN thing because it’s trendy. Not when it’s been founded on the backs of so many who dishonored, disenfranchised, or completely disrespected. There’s really nothing mainstream about it..

Funny, isn't it? How women thrive on a mans time, attention and resources, while simultaneously telling him he isn't enough...

[QuietlyquietlyParticipant 728]

The moment something is submitted for consensus, it is doomed. Wikipedia is the epitome of “What-The-Westernized-Value-System-Thinks-Is-Acceptable”. If you’re genuinely skeptical of global warming, for example (and from a purely scientific perspective, there’s very good reason to be), don’t bother looking at Wikipedia, as it shows what the majority of people believe and will unswervingly defend, even when they look like idiots for doing so. Wiki is Politically Correct, which is entirely un-cyclopedic of it. Consensus knowledge, just like consensus science, is the true dumbing down of society.

MGTOW? I personally think it’s a good thing that Wiki is trying to delete the entry, from the standpoint that ultimately we’re a stealth tactic. People will only find MGTOW when they are unplugging from the very viewpoints that create Wiki!

[Binary LogicParticipant 2351]

Quietlyquietly wrote:

The moment something is submitted for consensus, it is doomed. Wikipedia is the ….

Well… just… !@#$. It’s I actually agree with what you’re saying. The old lead a horse to water adage suddenly turned on its head.. they have to seek it for themselves… well said brother. Guess we’ll just let it burn…

Funny, isn't it? How women thrive on a mans time, attention and resources, while simultaneously telling him he isn't enough...

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Just delete it. If people want to learn about MGTOW, let them learn it here, not from biased bulls~~~ on that piece of s~~~ wikipedia.

That “online encyclopedia” is OK if you need to look up something like the names of the kings of Denmark, but f~~~ing worthless for just about everything else.

[Author]

Posts