MGTOW attack

Topic by Chaff/Flare

Chaff/Flare

Home Forums MGTOW Central MGTOW attack

This topic contains 15 replies, has 12 voices, and was last updated by DorkShit  DorkShit 3 years, 5 months ago.

Viewing 16 posts - 1 through 16 (of 16 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #290555
    +3
    Chaff/Flare
    Chaff/Flare
    Participant
    3235

    Was just poking around the web, found the SPLC hate site piece. Man, I’m new around here, have there been a lot of these attacks? So transparent…. They really are scared aren’t they?

    When you find yourself in the majority, it's time to reflect.

    #290558
    +1
    TattooDave
    TattooDave
    Participant
    6952

    http://bit.ly/1hmMgwE?cc=&utm_campaign=83181788&utm_medium=Email&utm_source=ExactTarget&ha=al_lf_vi_vi

    Nothing shows up under the search mgtow

    I can see their heads have been twisted and fed with worthless foam from the mouth. Bob d

    #290562
    +2
    Chaff/Flare
    Chaff/Flare
    Participant
    3235

    https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/intelligence-report/2012/misogyny-sites

    When you find yourself in the majority, it's time to reflect.

    #290565
    +2
    Zuberi Tau
    Zuberi Tau
    Participant
    10606

    This is old news.

    #290579
    +4
    Big Boss
    Big Boss
    Participant
    4496

    splc thinks everyone is a hate group and terrorist who aren’t israel first zionist.

    #290580
    +7
    Biggvs_Dickvs
    Biggvs_Dickvs
    Participant
    3725

    Wow. Looks like free publicity for MGTOW.

    So basically anyone who disagrees with them is a whatever-gynist.

    False rape claims are nothing to them. Ruining a man’s life forever means nothing to them.

    Way to kill their credibility – If I read that s~~~ even never having heard of MGTOW I would start looking up some of those sites.

    Notice they very conspicuously left out MGTOW. The idea that men might make the well informed, rational, and considered decision to simply walk away unravels their entire argumentative premise. It forces the reader to consider that we may have a point. IT also causes many of the to wonder why we would take such “strong” action against our natural pair bonding instinct.

    It begs the question: Why would they (us) do such a thing? Is it possible they(we) have a valid point?

    "Data, I would be delighted to offer any advice I can on understanding women. When I have some, I'll let you know." --Captain Picard,

    #290583
    +5
    Sandals
    Sandals
    Participant
    4253

    They are a hate group, looking for trouble. They are communists trying to advance the “revolution”. They are looking to use the court system to start fights. Somebody ought to be monitoring them they way they are monitoring everyone else.

    #290585
    +4
    Sidecar
    sidecar
    Participant
    35837

    The splc is nothing more than a sleazy money grubbing scam. They call every f~~~ing thing under the sun “hate” and then beg for donations from gullible leftists to “fight” that “hate”. They are as big a fraud as the westboro baptist church.

    #290597
    +1
    Chaff/Flare
    Chaff/Flare
    Participant
    3235

    I guess this is old and I’m behind the times. Still shocking to me…..a la ” how dare you stop playing, you owe us pig” truly, MGTOW is brilliant using stealth. Just going to leave a frustrated,pouting screamer without a target.

    When you find yourself in the majority, it's time to reflect.

    #290598
    +1
    Chaff/Flare
    Chaff/Flare
    Participant
    3235

    I was looking for a demonstration of pouting.https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=UpxYbcbCgkc

    When you find yourself in the majority, it's time to reflect.

    #290600
    +2

    Anonymous
    18

    Let them enjoy attacking mgtow for now.

    There will come a time that mgtow would be so interwoven in every fabric of existence one simply can’t point their finger at it and extract it as potential source of *insert women logic here*.

    Like electricity. Like internet.

    One just uses it. And profits.

    #290636
    +4

    Anonymous
    25

    Just SPLC, wiminz and feminists projecting their hate onto everyone else.

    Misogny shaming has no effect anymore, everyone knows they are just a bunch of women with mental health problems. Women incapable of distinguishing fact from feeling.

    #290638

    Anonymous
    25

    [EDIT] by Machiavelli

    #290641
    +7
    BrainPilot
    BrainPilot
    Participant
    7640

    I’ve known since I was a teen ager that I am a target. As soon as I realized what I could produce, and what was expected of me to give to women, I understood I was a target worthy of attack if I didn’t cooperate.

    The broadest definition of mgtow would include any man who chooses not to sign a marriage contract for any reason. Gays, monks, workaholics, paupers, visionaries… all kinds of men choosing not to sign a marriage contract for all kinds of different reasons. It would be difficult to identify any individual one of us as mgtow without that individual providing assistance by identifying himself as a mgtow.

    Since everyone here is anonymous, for all anybody knows, this whole site could be just 1 or 2 guys blazing away on keyboards pretending to be several thousand different people. Hard to attack a target that is that difficult to define. Realistically, this is just conversations between anonymous guys who have in common the decision not to sign that marriage contract, for whatever reason. How do you attack that?

    How do you attack one individual’s decision about what is the best way to live his own life? How do you attack another individual agreeing with that decision?

    There is no group structure, no officers, no membership list. Each man here has his own decision, and his own reasons. I think the best any attacker could do is to try to shame us one at a time whenever they stumble across one of us in the world, and then only if we help them by self-identifying.

    When I am occasionally asked why I am not married, usually by some prying woman, I have a variety of different vague, noncommittal answers. But none of them involve any reference to the word “mgtow”. My most useful go-to answer is usually something like, “Tried it… ‘didn’t work out…”, and then trail off into silence as though it is some terrible wound on my soul from which I haven’t and can’t recover.

    That ends that line of questions. I think the reason it ends that line so well is that it conveys the message that I am not qualified to be ‘the disposable male’… because I have already been ‘disposed of’… I think they assume that I was so financially destroyed by that experience that I am no longer worth having. Reality is that I got divorced at the beginning of my career before I had anything to take, and I got divorced because as soon as my career took off, my ex stopped working and flopped down on her ass expecting me to finance her entire existence for the rest of her life. I got divorced to effectively give myself a pay raise of my own money.

    I don’t have an ego that prevents me from letting a woman think she, or some other woman has ‘won’. I’m happy to let them think they won. If I achieve every one of my goals of personal health, wealth, freedom and security, it’s really better for me if one, or all women can be convinced to continue to believe that they have ‘won’. Otherwise, they never stop trying to ‘get even’ for the perceived sin I committed by abandoning them.

    ‘Sort of like an escaped slave faking his own death in order to prevent the search parties and bounty hunters from looking for him… šŸ˜›

    Look, it's not my fault that tornado dropped a house on your sister. Now get back on your broom and get your ass out of here... and take your monkeys with you

    #290656

    Anonymous
    42

    So transparent…. They really are scared aren’t they?

    Ask Milo Yiannopoulos, a Breitbart reporter who was maliciously silenced by Twitter while Twitter allows a rainbow of misandry from sunrise to sunset! Hellery Creeton has vowed to destroy and erase conservative media including the 1st and 2nd amendments to that old glorified (now ass rag) constitution.

    The so-called ā€œmanosphereā€ is peopled with hundreds of websites, blogs and forums dedicated to savaging feminists in particular and women, very typically American women, in general.

    Savaging feminists? Think about that one next time you see meet a homeless man on the run and a wanted criminal all because he was STUPID ENOUGH TO GET MARRIED TO THESE MOTHERF~~~ING LAWYERS THROUGH THE CONTRACT OF MARRIAGE OR ARBITRARY COHABITATION THAT DESTROYED HIM IN THE FIRST PLACE!

    It’s amazing just how f~~~ing BLIND a lawyer can be. The blind leading the blind! My only use for a lawyer is to fill in a pothole until the turkey vultures clean it out,,, then throw another lawyer in same hole, rinse and repeat until the roads are smooth as glass or I run out lawyers!

    I can’t wait for Armageddon! Surviving lawyers, Judges, lawmakers, and politicians?; 0! NADA! NONE! All f~~~ing DEAD!

    The LAW has been SHOVED UP OUR COLECTIVE ASSES FOR FAR TO LONG AND WAY TO BRUTAL!

    Islamic LAW is a walk in the park compared the what these motherf~~~ers created!

    #290753
    +2
    DorkShit
    DorkShit
    Participant
    4353

    An old single man had the best response I ever heard to, “why aren’t you married?” He would look her in the eye and say, “what’s it to yah?”

    Most would end it and go on but sometimes they started to rage and go red eye and he would wait until they finished yelling at him and say, “rave on cat s~~~.”

    Over the years I was lucky enough to hear this dialog many times. I sure do miss rotten john.

    Peace brothers

Viewing 16 posts - 1 through 16 (of 16 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.