Men Prefering to Bang Fembots Instead Of Bitches

[MOWsince95Participant 1446]

15 per cent of British men (and a few women) would have sex with a robot

That’s an article in The Sun … truth be told, given the bulls~~~ a woman brings to the event, the risk potential, and having to put up with her s~~~ thereafter, add me in and make it 16% …

The chaps who’d be up for courting a bot believed they could have a “fulfilling, emotional relationship” with a lifelike machine.

Sounds a lot more fulfilling than with any woman I’ve ever encountered. Bring on the fembots, and give them a huge off switch, and a remote volume control.

One thing … if 15% of guys would do this, that is 15% that could be MGTOW. No small potential number.

If you are MGTOW when you are young you have no heart.
If you're not MGTOW when you are 20 you have no brain.

[MERCHParticipant 56]

With our luck a terror organization would hack our fembots, murder us, take our money, and assume our identities…..wait a second….that sounds an awful lot like regular women…. we need terrorist proof fembots!
MERCH

[Anonymous 1]

MOWsince95 wrote:

The chaps who’d be up for courting a bot believed they could have a “fulfilling, emotional relationship” with a lifelike machine.

But remember, men only want sex and they only see women as sex objects… right?

It does raise the question: how low women went that some men (and I include myself on this category) would rather take their chances with MACHINES rather than the OPPOSITE SEX in order to get freaking AFFECTION? You know, the VERY THING women are supposedly GOOD AT.

Cheers.

[hmskl’dParticipant 6406]

I’d be perfectly happy living out the rest of my existence with the right interactive holograms for company.

[Anonymous 25]

As long as they figure out a way to program the robot without the crazy female behaviour I think it’s a great idea. Last thing we need is a robot with a constant victim narrative

[John Woods 13Participant 2855]

And those 15% are just the ones who’ll admit it.

MERCH wrote:

With our luck a terror organization would hack our fembots, murder us, take our money, and assume our identities

Just get the basic model (no WiFi)

The answer is NO. “I could but I won’t”. Memini murum!

[John Woods 13Participant 2855]

Anonymous wrote:

As long as they figure out a way to program the robot without the crazy female behaviour I think it’s a great idea. Last thing we need is a robot with a constant victim narrative

Just press the reset button, or if you buy the PRO model, you can program a hand gesture, like “SET Bitch-Slap = Refresh” or voice commands (“Please select voice command for MUTE. Recite the phrase after the beep”). Then, in angry Bugs Bunny voice, “Ahhhhh shut uuupppppp!“

The answer is NO. “I could but I won’t”. Memini murum!

[QcummerParticipant 652]

women already have sex with robots like the popular ‘the rabbit’ dildo and vibrators like the Hitachi Magic Wand.

Fembots are the future. I’m saving my money for one.

[megatoad69Participant 449]

No, what is needed is a real woman, with a robot brain.
Just imagine the ‘mechanic’…”Welp, don’t need that gelatinous mass anymore.” (removes brain, tosses it in the medical waste bin, and reaches for the NAWALT 2051 reprogrammable electronic brain.)

Now, you get everything you want in a woman, and you can program her to get you beer, give you blow jobs on command, or just have her programmed to STFU.

You can't reason with unreasonable, there; women, figured out, there is nothing to reason.

[PhantomParticipant 3328]

Count me in, especially if I can customize personality & intimacy settings as well as how it looks.

[RoyDalParticipant]

Credit: Dilbert by Scott Adams – Robot As Assassin – Wednesday September 02, 2015

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[MonkeyMindParticipant 5340]

A fembot sounds like far too much commitment to me. Also bear in mind how femnazi’s tried to infiltrate the gaming industry, what if that piece of crap suddenly got an automaic upgrade and started spouting feminist crap all day long?

[Anonymous 12]

I like how they feature a picture of a woman hugging a robot even though more men are willing to have sex with a robot than women. It screams PC, if women reject men there must be something wrong with men, if men reject women then there must be something wrong with men.

Of course unless you can send that robot off to work to earn money it has little use for women anyway, they already have various toys they can play with.

[PhantomParticipant 3328]

As long as I have control over it like my pc, on what gets updated and not, I have no problem putting in however much time I wish to tweak her to my exact specs.

It would have to have MAJOR security regarding the software and all.

Drive my car on the streets & drive my fembot in bed!

Can’t wait for the day to say it….I would prefer a fantasy world of having a real live female instead…but unfortunately, it is not available, so I will settle for the closest I can get to one.

[HitmanParticipant]

Sounds awesome! When I get out of debt I’ll be looking for one!

[ChristovParticipant 85]

MonkeyMind wrote:

A fembot sounds like far too much commitment to me. Also bear in mind how femnazi’s tried to infiltrate the gaming industry, what if that piece of crap suddenly got an automaic upgrade and started spouting feminist crap all day long?

Then take a hammer to it.

I said in another thread when I had just joined:

If you really want to see men going their own way, develop sex robots.

I would use one. And every guy I know would use one. Engineers already make better t~~~ than real ones… We can definitely make a better cum-dump.

[AncientwisdomParticipant 6089]

I read this same article today on Drudge Report and almost made a thread here. There are some gems in the comment section worth the read.

Resident cynic.

[AncientwisdomParticipant 6089]

I like how they feature a picture of a woman hugging a robot even though more men are willing to have sex with a robot than women.

That was the very FIRST thing I noticed as well. I did a double take to make sure I read the title correctly “15% of MEN”…wtf?

My thoughts are that if they showed a man with a female robot, it would scream “objectifying women”; but even that doesnt make sense because thats precisely what the article was about. So why imagery twist?

Resident cynic.

[AncientwisdomParticipant 6089]

what if that piece of crap suddenly got an automaic upgrade and started spouting feminist crap all day long?

That basically flies in the face of the entire purpose of the concept. Seems not even remotely in chance.

Resident cynic.

[EscapedMentalPatientParticipant 1489]

AHHHHH For Christ’s sake. NOW it makes sense. RO-BOT. BOTT.

I’ve been trying to find a way to f~~~ this thing for a week.

[Author]

Posts