Men Identifying as Polyamorous to Avoid Commitment

[MonkeyMindParticipant 5340]

Article from the Independant on the rise of single men self-identifying as Polyamarous as a way of avoiding committing to a relationship.

The Journalist is clearly salty and cries baby tears over this but who cares about her feelings. The guys doing this are Red Pilled and spinning plates on dating apps.

What’s funny is that the men are using Liberals own tactics against them by claiming they are not ‘progressive’ enough for not accepting their sexual orientation as Poly. What really gets the Journo butthurt is that their view of being Polyamarous doesn’t conform to her expectations of it.

The article cites that 31 per cent of women and 38 per cent of men believed their ideal relationship to be consensually non-monogamous. So this lifestyle is clearly becoming more common for both men and women.

https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/straight-men-dating-women-polyamory-bumble-a8294796.html

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

From the article “As more and more single women are asserting their power in the dating pool, men are needing to get increasingly inventive with how to shame women into accepting their terms.”

the fact is: accept our terms or move on—its just that simple. We (men) now make the rules since we have what is in demand. As men learn they can live without the stale, diseased meat flaps women must raise the ante if they want our attention or better access to our wallets. The price just went through the roof bitches. I hear crazy cat-lady starter kits are all the rage. Good riddance.

[Prophet MicahParticipant 1972]

HAHA! Thanks for sharing that article MonkeyMind! That was a breath of fresh air.

MonkeyMind wrote:

and spinning plates on dating apps.

You read the Rational Male?

No Wife - No Strife

[MonkeyMindParticipant 5340]

Prophet Micah wrote:

HAHA! Thanks for sharing that article MonkeyMind! That was a breath of fresh air.

MonkeyMind wrote:

and spinning plates on dating apps.

You read the Rational Male?

I used to read The Red Pill Subreddit. Not so much these days as it’s not as good as it used to be.

[Oz-BlokeParticipant 3233]

Well, what’s good for the goose is good for the gander.

#ManOut

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

Women are slowly beginning to realize men are exiting the scene; meaning there are fewer and fewer men “available” which means demand for these men is on the increase. It is simple supply and demand. when the supply is short the price goes up. Welcome to reality ladies. HA HA HA

[Anonymous 13]

I identify as MATRIX, bite me bitches.

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

The image is a woman with two men and the text is shaming men to come back to monogamy. Confusing

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[Sky-OParticipant 18953]

Women hold back on telling guys about their inherent and deeply ingrained polyamouros nature:

Because it is harder to secure assets and money from a guy if he thinks other men’s cum is running down her leg (or being swallowed)

Chameleon mode / unicorn illusion has to be maintained for maximum asset acquisition.

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

Sky-O wrote:

Because it is harder to secure assets and money from a guy

That article is another “come back to the plantation” bellows.
You’re just selfish if you’re not giving all your labor, assets and money to a woman.

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[NerevarParticipant 8040]

FrostByte wrote:

Sky-O wrote:

Because it is harder to secure assets and money from a guy

That article is another “come back to the plantation” bellows.
You’re just selfish if you’re not giving all your labor, assets and money to a woman.

I would happily jerk off in front of a c~~~, deposit my cum in a rag and then flush it down the toilet, just to see her reaction. “OMG NOOOOO! THERE GOES MY CHANCE OF AN EASY LIFE! HOW DARE YOU, YOU F~~~ING MISOGYNIST!”

"One of the best things internet exposed is just how insane women are." - Freeman_K

[Prophet MicahParticipant 1972]

Nerevar wrote:

“OMG NOOOOO! THERE GOES MY CHANCE OF AN EASY LIFE! HOW DARE YOU, YOU F~~~ING MISOGYNIST!”

And you just made me rupture my spleen, you asshole!

No Wife - No Strife

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

Nerevar wrote:

I would happily jerk off in front of a c~~~, deposit my cum in a rag and then flush it down the toilet, just to see her reaction.

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[sidecarParticipant 35862]

Oh look. There’s a comments section. You know what to do, gentlemen.

MonkeyMind wrote:

Article from the Independant on the rise of single men self-identifying as Polyamarous as a way of avoiding committing to a relationship.

Notice how absolutely none of these articles trying to shame men for being against commitment ever bother to give a reason why men should commit to a woman? What’s in it for the men? Anything?

They just take it as a matter of faith that men should commit to the benefit of women. End of story. Full stop. It never even occurs to them that if they want men to commit to them, then maybe they should offer some sort of real incentive. Nope. They just shame harder.

Except it isn’t working for them any more. Commit to a woman? LOLno.

And that is not our problem.

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22564]

MonkeyMind wrote:

Article from the Independant on the rise of single men self-identifying as Polyamarous as a way of avoiding committing to a relationship.

The Journalist is clearly salty and cries baby tears over this but who cares about her feelings. The guys doing this are Red Pilled and spinning plates on dating apps.

What’s funny is that the men are using Liberals own tactics against them by claiming they are not ‘progressive’ enough for not accepting their sexual orientation as Poly. What really gets the Journo butthurt is that their view of being Polyamarous doesn’t conform to her expectations of it.

The article cites that 31 per cent of women and 38 per cent of men believed their ideal relationship to be consensually non-monogamous. So this lifestyle is clearly becoming more common for both men and women.

https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/straight-men-dating-women-polyamory-bumble-a8294796.html

Gynocentric media:

Mens tactics/requirements – demanding, shaming, negative spin

Womens tactics/requirements – being selective, standards, positive spin

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[Mr LogicParticipant 625]

I love it when this s~~~ gets published and backfires with the comments. Anyone reading them? Popcorn prepared.

[743 roadmasterParticipant]

From the article
“In the past six months alone, four men I’ve dated have used this as a way of masking their attempts to shirk commitment, and tried to pressure me into agreeing to an arrangement I had no interest in.”

She is going into each date as THE ONE. No man not matter how blue pill is going to fall for a woman who is hearing the clock tick so loud every date is a husband hunt.
Did some looking this is her

mgtow is its own worst enemy- https://www.campusreform.org/

[ShineParticipant 1696]

FrostByte wrote:

The image is a woman with two men and the text is shaming men to come back to monogamy. Confusing

I often think this kind of dribble is aimed at female readers and alot of this is projecting. It’s like asking advice for a ‘friend’ you have that is in an embarrassing circumstance, so just flip the genders and it’s ok to project away.

All the slooty wimins who read the arcticle can get in a huff and use the throw away line, ‘men are pigs’, oh well guess I have to go polly too. #3boyfriendsisnotenoughatanygiventime #wheresmybetabae #imnotaslutijustliketof~~~ #andononononthecarouselgoeswhereitstopsnobodyknows

"Society is to blame" Denton

[sidecarParticipant 35862]

743 roadmaster wrote:

From the article
“In the past six months alone, four men I’ve dated have used this as a way of masking their attempts to shirk commitment, and tried to pressure me into agreeing to an arrangement I had no interest in.”

So in other words, she’s not interested in the men at all. She’s only interested in making the right sort of “arrangement” for herself.

This, gentlemen, is a whore.

Whores don’t deserve commitment.

[Gabriel A. KingParticipant 730]

Polyamorous ? Dude that’s nothing. I recently identified as a GAY black Muslim woman to avoid scrutiny.

[Author]

Posts