Member feedback on new article?

Topic by Tim Patten

Tim Patten

Home Forums MGTOW Central Member feedback on new article?

This topic contains 11 replies, has 5 voices, and was last updated by Jan Sobieski  Jan Sobieski 3 years, 9 months ago.

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #221621
    +1
    Tim Patten
    Tim Patten
    Participant
    659

    A site in the UK requested this article from me. If members see mistakes or other feedback please let me know.

    ————————

    Feminists’ Patriarchal Worldview Inspired MGTOW

    The roots of feminism, as well as women’s and gender studies initiatives, can be seen in a 1970s BBC documentary, Angry Wimmin (watch on YouTube), which offers insights on the origins of the women’s movement. Among those featured is Sheila Jeffreys, an influential lesbian activist, who speaks frankly about the movement’s mission as a “dedicated war” on men (Feminist Patriarchy Theory ). Over time, the radical feminism espoused by Jeffreys and others has had an insidious effect, promulgating widespread distrust of male virtues. Women’s rights propaganda has also altered the social landscape, undermining relationships between the sexes and transforming the once timeless ideals of love and marriage into relics of the past. The feminist patriarchy theory only divides the sexes and is fueling the popular phenomenon MGTOW, (Men Going Their Own Way).

    In fact, most men have been forced to abandon hope of establishing and maintaining a genuine partnership or marriage with a member of the opposite sex, especially, as the wealthy and powerful Gloria Steinem noted, “society…encourages women to be victims every way.” Notions like this, including descriptions of women as “chattel,” are actively promoted by feminists, strongly influenced by burgeoning women’s and gender studies programs that characterize our primordial patriarchy as an institutionalized and socially acceptable framework for male domination over women. MGTOW say “There are no benefits for men in marriage.”

    The extreme to which single-minded activists have gone is frightening. In recent times, radicalized feminists have launched genocidal social media campaigns, labeled with monikers such as “#killallmen,” “Control All Men,” “StraightWhiteMemes,” and “Kill All White Men.” Guised as satire, these memes connect with growing numbers of females who can’t help but resent men’s place in society. Such propaganda engenders disturbing visions about harming and wielding power over males, going so far as to make killing men seem artistically relevant. This blatant male hatred is a catalytic agent for Men to Go Their Own Way and other movements such as the Red Pill and Japan’s Herbivore Men .

    Recently multimillionaire feminist, Anita Sarkeesian said “There’s a toxicity within gaming culture, and also in tech culture, that drives this misogynist hatred.” Anita says “Everything is sexist!” Under the circumstances, it is not hard to see why many women have developed anger, resentment and contempt towards men, which can provoke desires and fantasies—as well as acts—of revenge. The relationship between the sexes has become a power play, where interactions are viewed in a harsh, zero-sum light. If women beat men by a wide margin on the playing field, the response is not “great job!” Instead, there are hostile taunts, such as “girls rule and boys drool!” Female empowerment has metamorphosed into an ugly vision of females overpowering males. Talk of “girl power” simply means pushing back against men. In retaliation, men are not pushing back, instead millions of men are discovering a lifestyle of freedom and success, away from women’s disgust of all things male.

    Hell Hath No Fury
    Admittedly, there are some who believe that patriarchy, a social system characterized by male domination, is an illusion; others, meanwhile, have no doubt that the widespread oppression of women is evidence of its existence. The fact that those on the very upper reaches of the economic ladder own or control the vast majority of the world’s assets, businesses and employees suggests there is no place or part of society that is not subordinate in some way to this particular structure—aside from a few matriarchal villages in Africa, perhaps, everything is patriarchy.

    Whether accurate or not, something has clearly played havoc with the relationship between the sexes, creating a situation where, for example, marriage is increasingly a one-sided arrangement. While some women have embraced gender differences and are incredible mates, others have established fulcrums of male antipathy, moving them freely along a continuum that begins with caution and distrust, passes through resentment, and ends at hatred. Once she is offended; Hell hath no fury and her vindication is reinforced by lawful bias. Women are divorcing men at alarming rates meaning, men who are in love can easily find themselves in danger; they must develop a gendered lens so they can objectively evaluate current and future companions. Feminist’s male hostility has served to convince more men that bachelorhood is the appropriate alternative. Japan’s Herbivore Men, and MGTOW ranks are growing daily.

    The Modern Men’s Liberation Movement
    Regardless, it seems doubtful that any of the so-called women’s movements, densely populated with advocates and adherents who openly despise males, can help resolve the many important issues that men grapple with, including a pandemic of male suicides. Feminists are less interested in equality than in creating a new world order, where woman only come first. For a growing number of them, their focus has increasingly become oriented toward males’ demise.

    Because of these and other distorted perspectives, masses of men have made the decision to opt out, leaving the pain and destructiveness behind. They are embracing movements and efforts such as Japan’s Herbivore Men, where marriage apathy is endangering the global economy. Feminist’s lopsided societal framework has systematically stacked romantic relationships against boys and men; thus the outgrowth of Red Pill and (MGTOW), forums aimed at helping men understand that the benefits for males of marital bliss are almost nil.

    The fact that the ideals of radical feminism have become so pervasive and entrenched suggests the only way things can improve has been to join hands with others who believe the modern world’s future can and will be incredible for men. Indeed, it is apparent that this perspective is gaining momentum. A hurricane of men’s liberation awareness—MGTOW, Red Pill and Herbivore Men—is circling the planet, unleashing freedom and empowering men to define and follow their unique, and uniquely masculine, paths. It is a new day for men: knowledge and freedom are at their fingertips partially due to feminism. They now have the opportunity to design the kind of passionate life that they might once have only dreamed about.

    About the Author
    Tim Patten is a retired software engineer and author of newly released MGTOW Building Wealth and Power. He also wrote WHY I CHEAT – 11 campfire stories for men’s ears only. Both books are a celebration of masculinity and pay homage to the modern men’s liberation movement.

    #221631
    +2
    Jan Sobieski
    Jan Sobieski
    Participant
    28791

    There is no patriarchy.

    Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

    #221638
    +1
    Tiga K
    Tiga K
    Participant
    1693

    Assuming this article is aimed at folks outside the manosohere, you might want to be more clear as to what you think the problem is. You alternate between criticizing women in general, feminism, and radical feminism. On the forum, we already have an idea of what you are talking about, but others probably won’t. They might assume you are accusing all women as being feminist and all feminist as being radical feminist. You also attributed the origins of feminism to the 70s which I think is usually associated with radical feminism, and that might confuse your readers even more. One more criticism: you put parenthesis around “Mgtow” in the second to last paragraph where there shouldn’t be. I assumed it was a typo as I read it. I hope that helps.

    #221646
    +1
    Russky
    Russky
    Participant
    13503

    I got an impression that Herbivores are not really embracing masculinity, but instead denounce any gender specifics, so in some clauses you can’t really pile them up with MGTOW and TRP. I also don’t know if TRP and MGTOW are different or not. I though it was pretty much the same idea – No?

    proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

    #221651
    Tim Patten
    Tim Patten
    Participant
    659

    You also attributed the origins of feminism to the 70s which I think is usually associated with radical feminism, and that might confuse your readers even more. One more criticism: you put parenthesis around “Mgtow” in the second to last paragraph where there shouldn’t be.

    Thank you… made the corrections

    #221656
    Tim Patten
    Tim Patten
    Participant
    659

    I got an impression that Herbivores

    Thank you I modified this a bit to make Japan something unique

    #221669
    +2
    Jan Sobieski
    Jan Sobieski
    Participant
    28791

    Tim,

    Paternity fraud is big right now in the UK.

    The archbishop of Canterbury to over the counter test kits on sale. Upto 30% of men might be raising kids that aren’t theirs.

    Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

    #221678
    Tim Patten
    Tim Patten
    Participant
    659

    Paternity fraud is big right now in the UK.

    Thank you!

    #221799
    +2

    Anonymous
    12

    Feminism as well as other “Equal Rights” movements has to maintain a Victim status or else they would have to admit that equality does exist and the power brokers for these groups would be out of jobs.

    So you have a situation where they actually become their own bullies and then start making up dumber and dumber reasons as to why they are discriminated against while all the time becoming more and more powerful.

    Feminists also will create their own problems, for example “Women have the right to do whatever they want with their bodies” then they will say “So many women are prostituting/doing porn now days” well you did say women had the right to do what they wanted with their bodies.

    And that is why all these Left Wing fantasies are coming to an end, they are ridiculous.

    #221804
    +2
    Russky
    Russky
    Participant
    13503

    Feminism as well as other “Equal Rights” movements has to maintain a Victim status or else they would have to admit that equality does exist and the power brokers for these groups would be out of jobs.

    So you have a situation where they actually become their own bullies and then start making up dumber and dumber reasons as to why they are discriminated against while all the time becoming more and more powerful.

    Feminists also will create their own problems, for example “Women have the right to do whatever they want with their bodies” then they will say “So many women are prostituting/doing porn now days” well you did say women had the right to do what they wanted with their bodies.

    And that is why all these Left Wing fantasies are coming to an end, they are ridiculous.

    Feminism is self-perpetuating because equality brings women suffering. So they think – “hmm – how do we fix this suffering? with more feminism of course! duh!”

    proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

    #221810
    Tim Patten
    Tim Patten
    Participant
    659

    groups would be out of jobs.

    A good idea for another article?

    #221821
    Jan Sobieski
    Jan Sobieski
    Participant
    28791

    Tim, follow the money. It will tell you everything you need to know about feminism.

    Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.