Mel Gibson Loses Half of His $850 Million Fortune to Ex-Wife in Divorce

Topic by Byron

Byron

Home Forums MGTOW Central Mel Gibson Loses Half of His $850 Million Fortune to Ex-Wife in Divorce

This topic contains 22 replies, has 19 voices, and was last updated by Tuneout  Tuneout 3 years, 6 months ago.

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 23 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #264690
    +7
    Byron
    Byron
    Participant
    465

    It’s not fresh news but still.. $425 000 000 down the drain.. for a single pussy.

    http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/entertainment/2011/12/mel-gibsons-loses-half-of-his-850-million-fortune-to-ex-wife-in-divorce/

    Still hard to comprehend the scale of this. Hell, even Mike Tyson is said to have made about $300 000 000 during his WHOLE career. And the net worth of Brad Pitt is $240 000 000.

    Yea.. seems only natural that a woman should be awarded $425 000 000 for making a few kids (she would have made anyway) and continuously spending more of Mel’s money while they were married.

    #264692
    +7
    Chir
    chir
    Participant

    Another reason MGTOW is full of awesome. You actually get to keep what you earn. Isn’t that a novel thought. You get to keep your s~~~.

    It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion, it is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shaking, the shaking becomes a warning; it is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion.

    #264698
    +5
    Freedom
    Freedom
    Participant
    295

    I understand the rationale for asset allocation to be based on a starting assumption that both parties made an equal contribution to the overall quality of life, and finances are just one part of that overall quality of life. So, assets are split (basically) down the middle to keep quality of life even after the split.

    This makes no sense to me. If we have an equal contribution to quality of life, and I am contributing 100% of the funds, then she must be contributing 100% of the sex and companionship. So if I must give her regular cash payments after she leaves, shouldn’t she be required to give me regular sex after she leaves? To keep things even?

    Of course not. The logic is flawed at its foundation. Even if we conceded (HYPOTHETICALLY speaking) that a 100% provider man owes his ex just enough so she can survive until she gets on her feet (as in, gets a job)…those numbers would be nowhere near the numbers we see here.

    It’s a rigged game. Don’t play.

    It is wise to fear dangerous commitments.

    #264699
    +3
    Red_Pill_Soulja
    Red_Pill_Soulja
    Participant
    221

    Un-f~~~ing-believable.

    #264706
    +2
    ResidentEvil7
    ResidentEvil7
    Participant
    9565

    First I didn’t know that Mel Gibson was worth that much. Even still, half of $850 million is still a decent life, even if half of it went to that bitch. And $425 to get back on her feet, as if that’s the kind of money to rebound your life with.

    https://themanszone.webs.com/

    #264726
    +3
    Experienced
    experienced
    Participant

    The raw deal = if you’re fool enough to marry one, you deserve to be slaughtered.

    “Yeah, ‘and I’m the president'” – Court Raped Club For Men.

    All we can do is tell guys.

    "It seems like there's times a body gets struck down so low, there ain't a power on earth that can ever bring him up again. Seems like something inside dies so he don't even want to get up again. But he does."

    #264727
    +8
    Bob__
    bob__
    Participant
    946

    She’ll be broke in 10 years after buying a bunch of wearable shiny rocks and other useless stuff.

    #264774

    Anonymous
    5

    The real lesson here isn’t the size of the payout, it’s the attitude of acceptance, approval and congratulations the woman will get after financially raping the man.
    Look at the female reporter. She doesn’t even attempt to hold back her sheer joy at reporting the matter. She can’t stop giggling.
    There won’t be a single complaint to the station from any of the millions of viewers.
    Imagine her attitude and society’s opinion if the genders were reversed in the payout.

    No one in society is going to give zero f~~~s if a man is stupid enough to sign a marriage contract. Men are fair game. That’s how people think, that’s how our system works.

    #264786
    The road
    the road
    Participant
    3125

    As if that bitch would have been able to make that money on her own had she never met Mel Gibson.

    #MANOUT

    #264790
    The road
    the road
    Participant
    3125

    I wonder if we’ll ever see a male movie star proclaim himself as MGTOW.

    #MANOUT

    #264794
    +1
    Bob__
    bob__
    Participant
    946

    I wonder if we’ll ever see a male movie star proclaim himself as MGTOW.

    Not as long as the tribe runs Hollywood.

    #264796
    Prefer Peace to Piece
    Prefer Peace to Piece
    Participant
    10809

    The real lesson here isn’t the size of the payout, it’s the attitude of acceptance, approval and congratulations the woman will get after financially raping the man.

    Good point. A woman receives accolades and cheers from her hive for extracting resources from a man. Her status within the hive is enhanced by hurting a man.

    Obviously, she doesn’t deserve this payout. She benefits from the crooked family court system women and their manginas put together.

    For the younger guys, this could happen to you.
    I could have retired long ago had it not been for my little fiasco.

    #264800
    +1
    Mr_Options
    Mr_Options
    Participant
    298

    Don’t get married. Enough said.

    A man without a woman is like a fish without a hook.

    #264804
    +5
    Keymaster
    Keymaster
    Keymaster

    Did you see the video with the thousand-c~~~ raspy-voiced bitch anchor in the yellow blouse? Jesus christ. “Yeah it’s $450 million but it’s not like he’s going broke”… with that smug enjoyment on her face. ‘

    How about you give the ex wife $100,000 and then anybody say the same thing.
    “She’s not exactly going broke”.

    But thats’ how women think. “He’s not gonna go broke”. He could give her nearly everything but $100K and that would still be true. The $450M won’t even get him a thank you. She won’t even buy him a house or a boat for Christmas. She takes the MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE even if it cuts him in half and kills him.

    Man cheats, he’s a slimy bastard who should pay. Even if SHE’s bad in bed.
    Wife cheats, he’s a bad husband who didn’t take care of her needs and he should pay.

    Basic math for women.

    If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.
    #264821
    +4
    Oz-Bloke
    Oz-Bloke
    Participant
    3233

    I’m curious to see if Mel Gibson is stupid enough to get married again. Fool me once ……

    #ManOut

    #264838
    +2
    Constantine
    Constantine
    Participant
    4420

    These women continuously prove that they’re no better than the average street hooker.

    I’m inclined to have a tiny little bit more respect for a woman in that profession, because she’s at least honest about what she does.

    Housewives, on the other hand, sporadically dispense sex whenever it suits them and, come divorce, accordingly believe that they’re now entitled to over $400 million for their “efforts”.

    Sex for money = Prostitute.

    Yet these housewives constantly look down their noses at hookers, riding their soapboxes and bemoaning the lack of dignity in selling your body for a tenner. That’s rich. At least a tenner is all the hooker asks for. Don’t misunderstand me, I realise that there are other hookers out there who demand more, but the fact that women exist who will blow you for only that much is telling.

    There was a scandal some years ago where this politician, can’t remember his name, was discovered to have slept with an escort. After enduring a barrage of criticism from the city, the escort finally gave an interview to some tabloid where she said to the women of New York, “Oh get real! You’re just like me!”

    I don’t usually agree with whores, but it’s kind of hard to argue with her there.

    To see what is in front of one's nose requires a constant struggle. -Orwell

    #264840
    +1

    Of course the crazy Mel Gibson would sell half his soul away to a gold digger.

    #264863
    +2
    Bob__
    bob__
    Participant
    946

    These women continuously prove that they’re no better than the average street hooker.

    I’m inclined to have a tiny little bit more respect for a woman in that profession, because she’s at least honest about what she does.

    I respect them more because they lower the cost of pussy. Married women want to increase the cost of pussy by altering the deal (changing the terms of the marriage contract etc.). Obviously this is why feminists hate prostitution. Prostitution “disempowers” women by reducing the value of pussy (pussy being the only power women have over men).

    #264881
    +1
    Wolf redpillman
    Wolf redpillman
    Spectator
    1658

    Ahhh just another fool let them burn

    #264885
    +2
    Wolf redpillman
    Wolf redpillman
    Spectator
    1658

    I really have no sympathy for thoses guys who’s get financially rape ,just before they get screw in courts thoses are that men’s who’s look down on man like me who never married and call us names like he’s weird and bla blah f~~~ them all and i hope that bitch f~~~ing mr bad boy now and spend his money on him karma is a bitch

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 23 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.