Media Bias Against Trump

[Anonymous 11]

[RoyDalParticipant]

There is no doubt in my mind that the mainstream news media is aligned against Trump and for Hillary.

Dr. Drew lost his TV show because he questioned Hillary’s health. It is a matter of record (leaked memos) that they fired him because he would not retract his comments about her.

All my life — at least since I’ve been paying attention — the media has been anti-Republican and pro-Democrat.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[Anonymous 0]

Here’s the background story on the incident in the OP:

Link: http://www.infowars.com/shut-it-down-reuters-orders-cameraman-to-kill-positive-trump-footage/

[Anonymous 16]

Well guys im from spain… soo is not of my busines, but… you have two monsters in town now you have to choose.
Die by godzila or king kong.

My advise… leave USA and move somewere else and fast 🙂

[Anonymous 11]

@Heguen:

Trump is actually sane. He does not have the stench of rampant corruption, nor has he left a trail of corpses over 35+ years. He may not be perfect, but in an election between a demented corrupt t~~~ I will support Trump.

They are freaked out, because Trump is pulling historically high support from black Americans.

@roy: Dr. Drew has received threatening phone calls and emails. I would not be surprised if he has a fatal “accident”.

[TuneoutParticipant]

No media is truly unbiased,as it shares it’s owners

viewpoints,thats why the best way for a person to

get the whole picture is to investigate different

sources and make their own conclusions.

Lifes a bitch,but you don't have to marry one!

[Anonymous 42]

When will Killery take QUESTIONS and GIVE ANSWERS? We’re coming up on a YEAR OF THIS F~~~ING C~~~ NOT HOLDING A PRESS CONFERENCE!
All she”’it does is follow trump around (figuratively) bashing him with outrageous and slanderous accusations, all the while she hides in a cocoon protected by media and not made to answer one single solitary motherf~~~ing question!

If she gets in without answering any questions in her entire campaign; what makes you think she’ll answer to the ATROCITIES she’ll COMMIT when elected president?

She’ll drain the remaining life blood of this nation!

Her sacrifice to the alter of feminism!

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22522]

If the media were any more bias against Trump, the media would be openly threatening Trump.

The bias and lies in the media has reached terminal full retard status. They have trashed their reputations. And if the election is rigged against Trump, which it looks like with the Homeland Security illegally taking over elections, the nation may collapse.

You cannot have a functioning nation where half the nation is chanting “lock her up” towards the person the government rigged to put in power. And the stolen election is so brazenly open. It does not work that way.

[Anonymous 6]

Anonymous wrote:

@heguen:

Trump is actually sane. He does not have the stench of rampant corruption, nor has he left a trail of corpses over 35+ years. He may not be perfect, but in an election between a demented corrupt t~~~ I will support Trump.

They are freaked out, because Trump is pulling historically high support from black Americans.

@roy: Dr. Drew has received threatening phone calls and emails. I would not be surprised if he has a fatal “accident”.

Really, I just don’t see him getting a huge chunk of the black vote. If he could get 10 to 15% however, he will be president. Im a black conservative myself, and even i realize that getting the majority of black people is a lost cause.

[UnicronParticipant 752]

CNN Admits “We Couldn’t Help [Hillary] Any More Than We Have”

It appears we have passed the point where hiding the collusion is even necessary…

Here is CNN’s New Day host Chris Cuomo explaining how – for Hillary Clinton – “we [CNN] could not help her any more than we have… she’s got just a free ride so far with the media.”

As DailyWire.com writes, it’s no secret that the mainstream media is a giant liberal cesspool willing to do and say anything to make sure their Democrat candidate gets elected. In this case it’s Hillary Clinton. Yet in the midst of two consecutive email scandals, her record of failure, including letting four Americans die in Benghazi, and having the father of the terrorist responsible for the worst attack since 9/11 sitting behind her at a recent rally, all the media can report is, “Hey, look, Trump said something distasteful again!”

In the compilation video (below), the YouTube channel “Centipede Productions” has amassed 10 minutes worth of CNN claiming technical difficulties, shouting down guests, and flat-out cutting the microphone of people who attempt to speak the facts pertaining to Hillary Clinton’s scandal-ridden past and present…

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-08-11/cnn-admits-we-couldnt-help-hillary-any-more-we-have

Marriage is the process of finding out what kind of man your wife would have preferred.

[FrankOneParticipant 1417]

MGTOW: It’s not to Shrillery’s advantage to take a bunch of unscripted questions or take any risks. Why? Because she’s in the LEAD. In politics, that would be unwise. Remember, the goal is to WIN. So that is why no press conferences have been held by S~~~lary for ages.

Tuneout: Yes, it is good to get your information from multiple sources — read WSJ (good solid news), NYT (big-time liberal bias), Economist (good solid news), NPR (National Proletariat Radio — left-wing bias on political stories, obviously, good solid outlet on non-political news), etc. And recognize the biases of each. Recognize even SCIENTIFIC publications have a bias — I read Scientific American, and even it has a strong liberal bias (more federal funding for science, big government, climate change, etc).

Since I’m not seeing the blackout story covered by Trump’s campaign OR Fox News after 2 days, I’m going with the more plausible explanation that it was staged OR the pool media was asked to leave as Sopan Deb indicates. Remembers, Reuters isn’t even headquartered in the US; it serves many languages and cultures. It is bad business for Reuters to be perceived as biased; and that is why there are few controversies involving it and bias accusations. Too many controversies and subscribers would drop it.

That said, the Lamestream media has an overall left-wing bias, and thus, a specific bias for Shrillery over Trump. I do not blame that on the newswires. Why do we have this bias? Because most Journalism students, reporters, writers, etc are Democrats. Now I am not a journalist, but even in high school, almost every kid in my Journalism classes was left-leaning. And the same is true in college. Just look at CNN’s coverage of the Church event; interviewing more opponents of Trump than supporters; giving near equal column-inches to the protest outside as to Trump’s speech, etc — these are the SUBTLE biases that pervade our media. Know them. Look for them. Understand them. Sometimes these can even be treated objectively in statistics, such as how many times a media outlet makes a POSITIVE vs a NEGATIVE comment about someone or something. Also, keep in mind the huge bias in what you DON’T read; that is, what stories the media covers and focuses on. Few stories on government waste, corruption, and deficits, for instance.

As for Blacks supporting Trump, even Fox News has him polling at only 1% among blacks.

[HitmanParticipant]

I’m sure the Clinton Foundation has donated to the various media outlets. .
$ = power. .
Hitlery..so connected with death and destruction. .
Trump. .businessman,built a virtual empire. .
It’s a no brainer. .

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22522]

FrankOne wrote:

Because she’s in the LEAD.

No she is not. Three weeks ago Trump was in the lead, Reuters (the same company that those that cut the video feed in the top post works for) “tweaked” (rigged) their polls to given her a 10 point lead against Trump. And in that ten weeks Trump has claimed back another ten points.

Trump is literally leading her in the RIGGED polls. Imagine how far ahead Trump is really leading when there is honest polling of the situation.

From what I hear Trump is leading with between 60% to 70% of the total vote. And given that Trump is fulling his stadiums and auditoriums for his rally, to max capacity, with more people outside, I believe that Trump is that far ahead.

Given last week’s round of political grand slams by Trump. From going to Mexican and getting the President of Mexico to agree with him, IN ONE DAY! And on the same day coming back to Phoenix, Arizona and getting ovations for his immigration and border plan speech. To his visit and speech of in the black Church in Detroit, which was well received. Trump it hitting on all the high notes.

Meanwhile, Hillary ignores the press. She only tweets insults towards Trump. She presents not plan. (Waving her arms around and declaring herself to be healthy, on a green screen, is not a plan. It is a fraud.) When she is not napping, she is raising money for herself. And she has raised over $450 million dollars in this election. She has only spent half of that.

Given her greed knows no bounds. I believe there is a possibility she is taking her handlers for a ride. And she is going to throw the election by sitting out. For example, during an rally of rich people, she con the children to get their parents to pay her $2,700 per question the children asked.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-09-04/show-hillary-love-rothschilds-urge-she-charges-2700-question-10000-family-photo

Keep in mind, if she drops out, she gets to keep the money she raised. And with that much money, she can protect herself from her handlers.

She knows she is being set up as a stalking horse to be replaced by Tim Kaine after the election. She has done this herself a few times. She knows between her handlers and the half of the nation against her, she will not allow her to be president. So, she is just trying make that one last quick buck. And ride into the sunset.

FrankOne wrote:

As for Blacks supporting Trump, even Fox News has him polling at only 1% among blacks.

And where did this poll come from? The polls have been openly found to be rigged against Trump. Repeating a lie does not make that lie true.

For example. Trump’s campaign office in Detroit is getting a lot of foot traffic: http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/09/trump-factor-detroit-gop-office-getting-lots-foot-traffic-requests-signs-trump-stickers-video/

People in heavily liberal areas of leftist states report a lot of Trump signs, a few Bernie signs, and almost no Hillary signs.

Also, it came out that the owner of Fox News has given orders to those of Fox News to take down Trump: https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2016/09/03/confirmed-rupert-murdoch-instructed-fox-news-to-take-down-donald-trump-august-2015/

Fox News is just as much against Trump as CNN, and just as bias against Trump.

[Anonymous 11]

Anonymous wrote:

If he could get 10 to 15% however, he will be president.

That is very true Venom. I recall the black vote runs more like 95% democrat traditionally. The democrats know that this 10 to 20% chunk of the black vote is critical. That percentage would be record breaking too. What exactly have democrats and republicans done for people of any hue? They have destroyed the American middle class so the elites can arbitrage away hurting both black and white Americans. The democrats seem to be well more connected with the 0.001% though.

As a black conservative, I know you have caught more than your fair share of s~~~ from both blacks and whites. God knows we can’t have black people being shown being gracious to Trump. The idea might just spread.

@faust: I’m still seeing Bernie signs. My liberal aunt in California hates Hilary for what they did to Bernie to give Hilary California. She is sitting this election out. The only Hilary sticker I’ve seen was on an old white codger’s car and a Hilary sign in the yard of a female university professor.

[Anonymous 6]

Anonymous wrote:

Venom wrote:

If he could get 10 to 15% however, he will be president.

That is very true Venom. I recall the black vote runs more like 95% democrat traditionally. The democrats know that this 10 to 20% chunk of the black vote is critical. That percentage would be record breaking too. What exactly have democrats and republicans done for people of any hue? They have destroyed the American middle class so the elites can arbitrage away hurting both black and white Americans. The democrats seem to be well more connected with the 0.001% though.

As a black conservative, I know you have caught more than your fair share of s~~~ from both blacks and whites. God knows we can’t have black people being shown being gracious to Trump. The idea might just spread.

Man black people hate black republicans. I haven’t gotten any heat from white people tho. Black people hate the fact that you go outside the box and think for yourself. Hell, read some of my posts on here. I may be black but i’m definitely not considered black amongst black folks

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22522]

Anonymous wrote:

I haven’t gotten any heat from white people tho. Black people hate the fact that you go outside the box and think for yourself.

That is why so many black men are going MGTOW. Such as yourself. As you pointed out. You think outside of the box. And there is no room for such thinking in the welfare group-think.

They want to be slaves, while you are running for it at the first opportunity. And we respect you for this.

Anonymous wrote:

As a black conservative, I know you have caught more than your fair share of s~~~ from both blacks and whites. God knows we can’t have black people being shown being gracious to Trump. The idea might just spread.

From the videos of minorities come to Trump rallies and leaving after the Trump rallies are over. With their views mostly positive towards what Trump is saying. I believe word is spreading.

Anonymous wrote:

@Faust: I’m still seeing Bernie signs. My liberal aunt in California hates Hilary for what they did to Bernie to give Hilary California. She is sitting this election out. The only Hilary sticker I’ve seen was on an old white codger’s car and a Hilary sign in the yard of a female university professor.

Exactly. This is what I am talking about. Outside of the media and one percent, Hillary has not real support. It is all manufactured.

I do not see the enthusiasm for Hillary. She cannot even fill up a high school gymnasium for a rally. That is bad. She refuses to accept questions and attend most public events. Something is very wrong with her campaign.

“Waiting out the clock” is not a campaign strategy, it is an exit plan.

On the other hand, Trump and Bernie has that enthusiasm from voters.

This weekend it came out that Homeland Security is illegally taking over the elections. The leftists are so desperate they are working to openly rig the election for her. And that will cause this nation to fully collapse.

[AncientwisdomParticipant 6089]

I was out last night and this girl literally said – “does anyone here support Trump?”. I raised my hand. She said – “wait! I don’t know if we can be friends; were not on the same intellectual level”. Luckily, before I could even say a word a couple guys I knew chimed in and blasted her.

Not on the same “intellectual level”; damn straight were not c~~~.

There you have it- the entire media and EVERYONE vilifies anyone who supports Trump. Its tantamount to a witch-hunt: “does anyone here support Trump?”. F~~~ off. Liberals are so infantile in their tactics. If anyone disagrees with ANY of their view points they just name-call- “your a RACIST. Your sexist” ad infinitum. Im so sick of it.

Resident cynic.

[Chaff/FlareParticipant 3235]

Anonymous wrote:

Well guys im from spain… soo is not of my busines, but… you have two monsters in town now you have to choose.
Die by godzila or king kong.

My advise… leave USA and move somewere else and fast

Yea good idea. Let’s go to Spain where the EU installed an unelected banker to head the country, the men have been disarmed, and the women are being raped by mussies. Tell you what, trump is a gamble, hill is sure bet

When you find yourself in the majority, it's time to reflect.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22522]

Ancientwisdom wrote:

There you have it- the entire media and EVERYONE vilifies anyone who supports Trump. Its tantamount to a witch-hunt: “does anyone here support Trump?”. F~~~ off. Liberals are so infantile in their tactics. If anyone disagrees with ANY of their view points they just name-call- “your a RACIST. Your sexist” ad infinitum. Im so sick of it.

Let’s follow Trump’s lead and call these “liberals” what they are. Bigots.

I am not advocating violence. But, they need to be verbally deposed for what they are. Which are bigots.

[FrankOneParticipant 1417]

If you look at an aggregate of the polls, over time, you can get a clearer pictures, e.g. http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html — Trump has actually had ‘crossovers’ where he is ahead of Shrillery; e.g. right after convention. Unfortunately, the site does not show the news events that cause the surges and declines, but it is still interesting.

Venom: Yes, most blacks hate Republicans. They call them ‘uncle Toms’ and other derogatory terms. Now, I don’t like Republicans either, because they’re too left-wing for me; I’m voting for Gary Johnson. But I think it’s racist to vote for somebody because they’re white OR black. I don’t give a rat’s ass what color the candidate is. Trump looks like he’s Orange and Shrillery looks wrinkly. Republicans have done a lot of damage to the urban underclass and blacks in particular, with the insane War on Drugs. Democrats have done even more damage with the Great Society and support for failed public education and Teacher’s Unions.

Fast Wries: No she is not. Three weeks ago Trump was in the lead, Reuters (the same company that those that cut the video feed in the top post works for) “tweaked” (rigged) their polls to given her a 10 point lead against Trump. And in that ten weeks Trump has claimed back another ten points.

Faust: Reuters simply removed the ‘Neither’ option. This has, at various times, favored one or the other candidate. It’s better to look at ‘aggregate’ polls, like the link above from Real Clear Politics — it represents an aggregate of many polls — rather than looking at one particular poll. ‘IS’ means ‘NOW’. Clinton is ahead by about 4% presently based on an aggregate of 10 polls. Even Fox’s most recent poll has her 6 points ahead. Trump WAS ahead, but it was FOUR weeks ago, not 3 — this was right after the convention. See aggregate poll chart, linked above.

Trump leading with 60-70% of the vote? If you really want to know what polls are RELIABLE, a publication devoted to such matters, 538, ranks them, based upon their reliability in predicting election winners. Again, if the polls are all ‘rigged’, why are the polls presumably run by Trump partisans, such as Fox News, not reporting different numbers than everybody else?

FrankOne wrote: As for Blacks supporting Trump, even Fox News has him polling at only 1% among blacks.

Faust responds: And where did this poll come from? The polls have been openly found to be rigged against Trump. Repeating a lie does not make that lie true.

Fox does its own polling. Where it came from? Real Clear politics links to it, but here it is: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/interactive/2016/08/31/fox-news-poll-aug-31-2016/

As for Fox having a liberal bias and being against Trump, that’s a tough one to sell… Just turn it on and watch!

Now one poll I like: 63% saying Trump was not ‘honest and Trustworthy’ and 66% saying Hillary was not honest and trustworthy. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/09/01/fox-news-poll-voters-think-clinton-and-trump-will-do-anything-to-win.html There may be hope for the American people yet!

[Author]

Posts