MD Senate Bill 1062 banning possessing magazines > 10 rnds

[Ranger OneParticipant 16836]

“1 AN ACT concerning
2 Weapon Crimes – Detachable Magazines and Regulated Firearms – Possession
3 FOR the purpose of prohibiting a person from possessing a certain detachable magazine that has a capacity of more than 10 rounds of ammunition…”

So no grandfather clause… merely owning a previously purchased magazine will make you a criminal.

Line drawn. If it passes, I’m going to organized an armed march on the state capital to tell them no. I want a few thousand armed citizens to say “we don’t recognize your unconstitutional law and we are rendering it null and void”.

Its time to say NO to these c~~~~~~~~~s. If they want to open fire first, so be it.

All my life I've had doubts about who I am, where I belonged. Now I'm like the arrow that springs from the bow. No hesitation, no doubts. The path is clear. And what are you? Alive. Everything else is negotiable. Women have rights; men have responsibilities; MGTOW have freedom. Marriage is for chumps. If someone stands in the way of true justice, you simply walk up behind them and stab them in the heart-R'as al Ghul.

[Anonymous 1]

How many VERY law abiding citizens own at least one 9mm pistol (or similar)? What percentage of those hold >10 rounds?

Sounds like a bill for fascist lefties with stock in M1911A1 manufacturers.

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

I spent money and now I’m not grandfathered in. F~~~ that.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[Ranger OneParticipant 16836]

Further more, guess which c~~~s introduced the legislation: Baltimore City Senators. Those ignorant c~~~s can’t keep crime down in their city, so that group of criminal scumbags wants to impose their will on the rest of the state. F~~~ them.

The number to call the Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee to oppose it is 410-841-3623.

My further response is a complete boycott of the city of Baltimore. I will buy nothing there.

All my life I've had doubts about who I am, where I belonged. Now I'm like the arrow that springs from the bow. No hesitation, no doubts. The path is clear. And what are you? Alive. Everything else is negotiable. Women have rights; men have responsibilities; MGTOW have freedom. Marriage is for chumps. If someone stands in the way of true justice, you simply walk up behind them and stab them in the heart-R'as al Ghul.

[xanthineParticipant 4903]

Hmmm…glad i don’t live there. They would REALLY hate all my 30 and 40 round ar15 mags

[Anonymous 42]

Baltimore?

let us pray…

[RogueParticipant 258]

Hey Range One, I think its time to move. I used to live in NJ. I got the F_ck out and now I live in a more free state, until the CA move here a F_ck this place up. I am prepared to move again if I need to. A form of Socialism is coming as soon as the Dems get back in, be prepared it is going to happen.

Time to get the F~~~ out.. Move to a free state you will be much happier to live like a free man..

[RobertPaulsonParticipant 128]

#metoo

I used to live in NJ and moved too… My tops state picks are FL, TN, and TX.. although.. TX is getting swamped by CA liberal DB’s!!!

I’ve gotten involved in my local and state politics, and have been looking into local prepper groups just in case. I definitely want to be involved with a group if the s~~~ hits the fan and not on my own. I like Smithfix’s approach.

[ForeverDoneParticipant 2928]

It’s so stupid. It’s not the guns, it’s the mentally ill people on all of these drugs (legal or not).

Why didn’t we have these issues prior to the late 90’s? Think about it.

Good video:

[Ranger OneParticipant 16836]

Rhetorical question… alcohol kills thousands of people each year… from both drunk driving AND other causes.

Drinking alcohol is not a constitutionally-protected right nor is it a basic human right such as the right to self-defense.

Why not ban alcohol?

All my life I've had doubts about who I am, where I belonged. Now I'm like the arrow that springs from the bow. No hesitation, no doubts. The path is clear. And what are you? Alive. Everything else is negotiable. Women have rights; men have responsibilities; MGTOW have freedom. Marriage is for chumps. If someone stands in the way of true justice, you simply walk up behind them and stab them in the heart-R'as al Ghul.

[Anonymous 1]

Liberal lefties in Congress need alcohol at their fundraising political self-aggrandizement orgies in their gated communities and entourage of armed protectors….they have no need to own firearms themselves.
Therefore…they have great fondness of alcohol, no need for guns.

And alcohol is wanted by lots of folks…and heavily taxed…like cigarettes which could also be banned. After the sales tax of your gun, there is no more tax revenue. FOLLOW THE MONEY.

[Anonymous 1]

Speaking of taxes…
I can EASILY see an annual gun tax looming. It will be small, as part of the “pitch”…like $10 per year per gun owner.
It would be “sold” as a way to fund “common sense items that everybody supports” like gun safety programs, faster/better background check systems, trigger locks to protect the children, better tools and safety equipment for cops, etc.
They will likely call it a euphemism for “tax”…like a revenue or “firearm safety fee.”

[HitmanParticipant]

They can’t confiscate all of these.
They know it.
It’s a recipe for civil war.
Hopefully it doesn’t pass.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22557]

The fools in Minnesota pushing this state level ammo magazine ban believe they are winning in doing so.

They forget that in the 2016 presidential election, President Trump almost won Minnesota. Such a bill as this could be the determining factor for the election races this year in Minnesota, with most of the voters whom vote on this issue responding negatively towards this bill.

As much as the elite level progressives wish for a gun ban for the “commoners” to push forward with their horrible plans for the American people, gun bans are not popular in the U.S.

Actually, with the frenzy of anti-President Trump fear the corporate media has whipped up among the rank and file leftists, many leftists are now almost as pro-gun ownership for themselves as the nationalists are.

[ForeverDoneParticipant 2928]

Ranger One wrote:

Rhetorical question… alcohol kills thousands of people each year… from both drunk driving AND other causes.

Drinking alcohol is not a constitutionally-protected right nor is it a basic human right such as the right to self-defense.

Why not ban alcohol?

Taxes.

[anonymousyamParticipant 4605]

This one has to do with pigs trying to control us and what we can and cannot own or do. See the fact is that the pig police and their government will still have all the deadly weapons, all the high end rounds the citizens are not allowed and all of the machine guns while imposing laws on the citizens blocking their rights to own firearms.

The fact is if someone really wants to kill alot of people they will be able to regardless if guns are legal or restricted. What prevents this is citizens exercising their rights to be able to take out a mass shooter if needed (citizens carrying guns killing a mass shooter in the progress). Taking rights away from the civilians will just make civilians criminals and any criminal (not that i am against crime i don’t give a f~~~) still have access to guns.

All gun free states or nations do is drive up the prices for guns and if someone really wanted to shoot alot of people in England they would be able to they would just need more money to buy the firearm.

Ranger One wrote:

Rhetorical question… alcohol kills thousands of people each year… from both drunk driving AND other causes.

Yes but it is a personal right to do what we want with our bodies and government pigs can’t tell us what we can and cannot do. If you get killed drunk driving you are one retarded f~~~er and that is that but that in no means we should ban alcohol.

The government has no right to go after the rights of the citizens.

Ranger One wrote:

Drinking alcohol is not a constitutionally-protected right nor is it a basic human right such as the right to self-defense.

If someone wants to take drugs doing what they want with their own bodies then it is their right to. It is called the right to Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness and outside of this is simply Bodily integrity.

If i have a right to self defense then i have a right to do what i want with my own body whether defend it or harm it.

Ranger One wrote:

Why not ban alcohol?

The problem with this argument is that it opens up the banning of both of them. If you have some liberal willing to take away someone’s rights why would they be stopped in revoking even more rights from people? If you take away one right you are sure as hell capable of taking away alot more.

Just an east coast asshole who likes to curse, If you get offended by words like fuck, cunt, shit, piss, bitch or any racial slurs then you just scroll down.

[Ranger OneParticipant 16836]

IMHO, the drug war was the second giant step towards a police state.

The third was the “Patriot” Act.

Funny how many laws have names that are the exact opposite of what they are. But I guess that is Newsspeak. (as in 1984)

All my life I've had doubts about who I am, where I belonged. Now I'm like the arrow that springs from the bow. No hesitation, no doubts. The path is clear. And what are you? Alive. Everything else is negotiable. Women have rights; men have responsibilities; MGTOW have freedom. Marriage is for chumps. If someone stands in the way of true justice, you simply walk up behind them and stab them in the heart-R'as al Ghul.

[Author]

Posts