Home › Forums › MGTOW Central › marrying sluts
This topic contains 16 replies, has 11 voices, and was last updated by 
AussieBloke 4 years, 11 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
i tried to give my friend a dose of the red pill but he’s not interested in taking it. i asked if he would marry a slut and he said that under the right circumstances, he would. he said that he sees no difference between a girl who’s only had one c~~~ in her and a girl who’s had hundreds of c~~~s in her. she’s been used as a cum receptacle all the same, except the slut is more experienced and knows what she wants. as long as she doesn’t have any stds and loves him, it’s fine.
personally, i stay away from sluts. whether they ride the c~~~ carousel and or use social media to feed their egos, i have no interest in that. i don’t think a girl who’s been saving herself or has been very selective with her partners is on the same level as a one who stages gang bangs on the weekends. maybe i’m just conservative in that respect, but i’m curious as to what you guys think about this.
knows what she wants
“knows what she wants”. How the f~~~ is “knowing what you want” an asset? These women who say “I know what I want” like it’s some kind of laudible quality, and you’re expected to give it to her. WTF?? Yeah I know what I want too. But I don’t go around announcing it like it’s something you give a s~~~ about. You hear women say things like “40 is the new 20. We older women know what we want”. How is knowing what you want any great measure of character? Any f~~~ing idiot can “know what they want”. Big deal.
What do women want? Who f~~~ing cares.
That’s my rant on that and exactly what you tell any blue pill guy who says that s~~~ too.
personally, i stay away from sluts. whether they ride the c~~~ carousel and or use social media to feed their egos, i have no interest in that. i don’t think a girl who’s been saving herself or has been very selective with her partners is on the same level as a one who stages gang bangs on the weekends. maybe i’m just conservative in that respect, but i’m curious as to what you guys think about this.
It’s actually not an opinion, but the more c~~~s a woman has been ravaged by …. the less she will be mesmerized by any one of them.
“Oxytocin depletion” is A STATISTICAL CERTAINTY which points to the same thing over and over again.
It prevents her from being able to “bond” to only one male.• 2+ lovers in her life (yes, LIFE) and the odds of divorce double
• 3+ lovers in her LIFE, and the odds increase to 50%+
• 5+ lovers in her life and the odds of cheating is HUGE and her initiation of divorce becomes a near 80% certainty.10+ and you can forget about marriage or any real pair bonding. Yes the marriage may still “not fail”, but only because you’re providing her with other s~~~ and she can’t do better. It’s not because she has pair bonded with you. If she has had 5+ dicks, data says don’t marry her. Bang away, but forget a life contract… because she will be straying — certainly in spirit.
The “thousand c~~~ stare” is not actually the result of 1000 c~~~s.
It happens much sooner than that.There IS however a certain respect to be had for “sluts”. At least they don’t go around pretending they are NOT sluts. Sluts are not the problem. It’s women who pretend they are NOT sluts that’s a problem. They will wear white at the wedding and blow the best man when the groom’s not looking. My days as a bartender (in my 20s) have revealed s~~~ to me that would turn your hair WHITE.
If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.In the last 550 years, right up until the sexual power grab, I mean revolution of the sixties. The first advent of radical third wave gender feminism that stopped being coy about their goals and hating men and all things male, even including male children, is the chief one.
For the earliest 500 years, women who were slutz were seen as mentally week and placed in wards were they were kept busy doing laundry, a fate called brutal and dangerous at the time, so they didn’t screw the next sailor that came off the boat. That would be 1550 until 40 years ago.
Before this female promiscuity was seen for what it is, the sign of a weak character just like drinking to excess is seen as a weakness in the male character.
We don’t really know how far back this goes but the earliest written records of the Jews circa 1200 bce that the bible describes eve as being the more sexually out of control than Adam.
In the Middle Ages it was seen that women and marriage had a corrupting influence on men. I have seen the paintings of seductress wife welcoming men to bed.
This cant be right? We know slut walks are a good thing, like feminism. We know that in Pompey it was a giant swingers club.
We know nothing. Our feminist overlords have re-written history so brainwashing of the masses would be complete, a page right out of 1984, required reading at the time, now off the school reading lists in favor of Mary Daily.
Now we are finding out that teachers think it’s ok to screw their class children as long as they want it. Some feel she was raped. Most think he is so “lucky”. Recently Nuns are now being demonized as child sexual abusers though we all know corporal punishment is a feature in the feminist nuns schools.
This will go down as a crazy bacchanalian orgy that came when the west ruled the world post wwII.
We are already seeing the decrease in women’s happiness foisted on them by feminist doctrinaire.
You must dress like a seedy hooker to get drunk enough to do it, get laid for free and somehow feel used the next day. Who would have thunk it. As long as you study coding your ok.
Then when inevitably these single “future world leaders all”, get preggers they again are headed feminist style to government killing clinics for swift and guilt free killing of your unborn baby. And I don’t judge abortion but these are the facts like the sky is up and gravity pulls down.
So their feminist sisters are their to guide them, most of today’s eduacated independent and empowered leaders of tomorrow, through the most whorendous ( sp on purpose) period in their life. This from trying to live up to the feminist program of promiscuity demanded by their mothers and every layer of the female heirarchy just as sexual reputation used to make a woman valuable.
Is it any wonder our women’s world view is so tied up with feminism and why they react so fiercely when their new religion is questioned.
Now we have intelligent men asking if marrying a whore is a bad idea. It always was and now they are all like that. Just ask them they’re proud of it. Just remember to multiply her answer by three to get the true mileage on that cum receptacle.
#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.
Anonymous42It prevents her from being able to “bond” to only one male. • 2+ lovers in her life (yes, LIFE) and the odds of divorce double • 3+ lovers in her LIFE, and the odds increase to 50%+ • 5+ lovers in her life and the odds of cheating is HUGE and her initiation of divorce becomes a near 80% certainty.
KeyMaster is so correct on this statement, married women that were once c~~~hoppers will always be c~~~hoppers, it’s a weakness they have, they want the thrill of romance, the fire of passion, they’re not happy inside, they’re wanderers, I have the same problem they do, but different, I had to many broken bonds, I tried to honestly bond, I was devastated EVERY time I fell in love (VOMIT).
My one night stands, and general misbehaving with women thought me to NEVER trust in a woman! The c~~~ blockers, White Nights, and all other manner of DRAMA was there in the wings, I got the f~~~ in, and I got the f~~~ out before all the s~~~ hit the fan.
“”””The “thousand c~~~ stare””””” boy don’t we all know that one, they’re just seeing one more c~~~ that they didn’t get to try. I still get those looks, I will NEVER respond again. I’ve gone 17 years in abstinence for a damn good reason, one of my “FLINGS” came back to me with a BOOMERANG of bad news, she was diagnosed with Hep.2 or 3 I forget. But any way, that bad news was told to me about 2 mos. after our fling, I had myself tested and it came back -, sheewwwwie, My f~~~ing heart dropped, then I thought NEVER AGAIN, NOT EVER, I’m DONE! and that’s how that went….
You want to play asshopper with the c~~~hoppers, be my guest! Good luck, you’re gonna need it! AWALT!
“I know what I want” is a lie. Not a great start to any good relationship.
BVC
Swallow this RED PILL ===> Men will lay down their lives for their brothers, their women and their children. This makes Men useful as slaves. Women will lay down their lives for ONLY their children. To expect more from women is just a FANTASY created by society and reinforced by the unconditional love that we experienced from our Mothers. The key to freedom is the understanding that the woman you meet is not going to fantastically love you like your Mother did. If you buy into the fantasy, then she is your new master. If you do not buy into the fantasy, then she is nothing, and you retain your freedom.
Sluts are useless for me personally. Why even bother with rolling the STD dice for 10-15 minutes of my time? Sure in my younger days they were fun but getting burned/stalked by them is scary. Rather work on my muscle car and drink beer with my male buddies instead.
There will always be a surplus of blue pill men that will put sluts on a pedestal for their wet spot down there but after sex what’s their use? If a women slept with 20-30 men before you, why would she consider you any more special? Think about it everything she learned sexually was from her past c~~~ carousels.
Sluts don’t love, they suck & f~~~ and see what they can get out of you. If she gave you the pussy for free why spend anything on it? Literally a money pit if you ask me.
Imagine paying for a brand new car but the dealership gave you one with 100k already on it and you didn’t know. Sure it may smell new but the new car smell air freshener runs out down the street. Soon the weardown and squeaks come out and you’ve been had! A “mexpensive” problem for sure!
Anonymous11“40 is the new 20. We older women know what we want”
Yeah, those snake oil cellulite, stretch mark, and spider vein removal creams are exactly what they want at that age.
I don’t even think I’ve ever met a woman that has not taken on less than 5 c~~~s which probably explains everything. Sluts are pump and dump material only. To marry one is only going to come back and bite him in the ass hard. STD free or not a slut is a slut.
I’d like to actually meet a woman who was or is not currently a slut. I’m thinking unicorn here I know.
it’s a weakness they have, they want the thrill of romance, the fire of passion, they’re not happy inside, they’re wanderers
Oh yes, in fact one *wanderer* I remember blamed me for not giving her what she wanted or “not being there enough”…. but she was so *like that* , in the years I haven’t seen he shes’ been someone else’s wife….. I know in her heart she is miserable.
Make mo mistake…. adding to what’s above, if she cheated WITH you, she cheated ON you. It may surprise you how few women are already involved with a guy when they start going to the next one. If you think women are just walking around “single” until they meet the right guy, guess again. They are doing or working SOME one. Even if she’s not screwing him, or you, or the guy who’s taking her out every weekend for a months”because she wants to take things slow…. she’s screwing SOMEONE.
If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.They’re not riding the carousel. They’re conducting research to find out who their “ideal” man. (Yeah, right.) The chances of any woman who does that actually coming to her senses eventually and settling down with one man only are pretty slim. I grew up in a one-horse town in a remote part of Canada and I saw a lot of that sort of thing going on.
But, here’s something to consider. Many years ago, when people were becoming aware of AIDS and its social consequences, I heard an episode of the CBC science program Quirks and Quarks on the radio. One of the items on that show was about that disease and why taking precautions was necessary. One of the experts who was interviewed made the comment that because the viruses for some STDs can be long-lasting, when one has sex with someone else, one is, in effect, doing so as well with whoever that other person had been with.
I never forgot that and it influenced how I decided on which women I wanted to date, let alone sleep with.
Yes to all of this, and a double yes to avoiding STDs. Gone are the days when sex was safe and hang-gliding was dangerous.
I was bound to be misunderstood, and I laugh at those who misunderstand me. Kind mockery at the well intentioned, but unfettered cruelty towards those would be prison guards of my creative possibilities. This so as to learn as much from misunderstanding as from understanding. Taking pleasure in worthy opponents and making language fluid and flowing like a river yet pointed and precise as a dagger. Contradicts the socialistic purpose of language and makes for a wonderful linguistic dance, A verbal martial art with constant parries that hone the weapon that is the two edged sword of my mouth.
I’ve broken in my share of virgins, and they are all still women. Don’t expect loyalty from any of them; as soon as they think they can get a better deal elsewhere, they’re gone. Experienced women simply have a better idea of what else is out there (but usually not enough to know when the grass isn’t actually greener).
More importantly, slut or saint, the law is the law, and the law is not in your favor and is not your friend. The instant a man signs on the dotted line he places himself under that awful damoclesian sword. The particular woman is irrelevant. The way the divorce courts utterly destroy men isn’t worth any amount of risk. No woman is worth that, especially when all the real so-called “benefits of marriage” have nothing to do with actually being married. You can get them all without getting married and without the associated risk.
Sidecar:
In recent decades, it appears that marriage has returned to its original purpose: the confirmation of social and economic status as well as the legalization of procreation for the purposes of succession. (Do you want your kid on the throne? Marry into the monarch’s family. Do you want to prevent the neighbouring tribe from attacking you? Marry the chief’s daughter and he’ll leave you alone–waging war on one’s in-laws isn’t particularly good for business.)
This notion of marriage being about two people being enamored with each other is recent in human history. It was popularized by poets and wandering troubadors but has been exploited by manufacturers and merchants to produce and sell candy, jewelry, cosmetics, and cheaply-made women’s underwear.
When seeing a topic like “marrying sluts”, an unenlightened male might respond: “Sluts? F~~~ them.” Or possibly: “Sluts? Hell yeah f~~~ them!” But an intelligent enlightened Man Going His Own Way will respond: “Marriage? F~~~ THAT!”
Sidecar: In recent decades, it appears that marriage has returned to its original purpose: the confirmation of social and economic status as well as the legalization of procreation for the purposes of succession. (Do you want your kid on the throne? Marry into the monarch’s family. Do you want to prevent the neighbouring tribe from attacking you? Marry the chief’s daughter and he’ll leave you alone–waging war on one’s in-laws isn’t particularly good for business.)
Marriage has only ever been about property. Your property. Whether it’s the disposition of a kingdom or just a couple of peasant strip fields, that’s all marriage has ever been. It’s just that in recent decades the actual terms of the marriage contracts men obliviously sign have been determined post facto by the divorce courts, irrespective of the terms of the contract, any pre-nuptual agreements, prior social norms or whatever. And divorce courts have allowed women to completely abandon all their responsibilities in marriage while keeping the traditional burdens firmly on the heads of men (and adding in a few more).
This notion of marriage being about two people being enamored with each other is recent in human history. It was popularized by poets and wandering troubadors but has been exploited by manufacturers and merchants to produce and sell candy, jewelry, cosmetics, and cheaply-made women’s underwear.
The notion of marriage being about vague intangibles like “love” and “romance” was created to sell marriage itself. It started being popularly associated with marriage about the time dowries started going out of fashion as a way to entice men into what has been an increasingly one sided and unfair property contract. That’s right, at one time fathers of women had to actually pay men to take on the support of their daughters. However, women learned over time that clever marketing called “romance” is much cheaper, especially if they desired a man their fathers didn’t approve of. But only in the short term, because dowries served two functions: they were an enticement to men for marriage up front, and they were to be returned to the woman in the event of a marriage dissolution for her support. Without dowries to support them after marriage dissolution, women needed to a new way of continuing to feed themselves, this time off their ex-husbands instead of their own fathers’ provided dowry. That’s where “no fault” divorce and alimony come in, along with all the other ever increasing burdens without benefit marriage is for men.
So men, the next time you hear some woman suggesting marriage, demand to see how large her dowry is. But don’t marry her regardless. The courts will still ruin you.
@sidecar. Haven’t said it yet , but welcome to the MGTOW forums.
If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.i appreciate the replies guys. i wouldn’t be here if i weren’t against marriage all together, but my friend is set on it. so i was thinking that if he’s going to marry a girl, at least pick someone who’s less likely to screw you over, but i guess it’s a crap shoot one way or another. feels s~~~ty to just watch someone you care about gamble away their life like that.
@sidecar. Haven’t said it yet , but welcome to the MGTOW forums.
Thanks. Been lurking forever. Finally decided to make an account.
my friend is set on it. so i was thinking that if he’s going to marry a girl,
Some people simply have to learn things the hard way. There’s not much you can do about that.
at least pick someone who’s less likely to screw you over,
I used to think that, but these days I think it’s better with a woman that screws him over as quickly as possible. The longer the marriage lasts the worse the divorce will be.
Sounds to me like your friend needs to do a s~~~ test of his own (on the girl) first, you can at least plant the seed for him to do that, what s~~~ test you ask?
A couple of gentle probes such as:
How does she feel about a pre-nup?
Does she earn more than he does?
Is she willing to wait for marriage without a known timeline?
i appreciate the replies guys. i wouldn’t be here if i weren’t against marriage all together, but my friend is set on it. so i was thinking that if he’s going to marry a girl, at least pick someone who’s less likely to screw you over, but i guess it’s a crap shoot one way or another. feels s~~~ty to just watch someone you care about gamble away their life like that.
The harder the fight the sweeter the victory
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678
