Marriage Redefined

[FunInTheSunParticipant 8283]

The current legal obligations of marriage makes me want to avoid it. But what if there was an alternative to it? I propose that there should be a way for a man and a woman to be companions without any future forced financial obligation to each other. What I’m proposing is: passing a law that allows private domestic partnerships that cannot be arbitrated by any judge if the relationship falls apart. It’s a situation where two financially independent adults decide to have a romantic relationship that is outside the legal boundaries of marriage. They both agree to leave with their own material possessions if the relationship goes sour, and they will have no further obligations to each other (financial or otherwise) after that. A legal document would state exactly what property remains in possession of each party during and after the relationship.

Would anyone be interested in passing such a law or does it seem like a wasted effort to you? The reason I’ve brought this topic up is: I still wish I could have a companion, but I also want some legal asset protection as well. I don’t want to be married to the government!

"I saw that there comes a point, in the defeat of any man of virtue, when his own consent is needed for evil to win-and that no manner of injury done to him by others can succeed if he chooses to withhold his consent. I saw that I could put an end to your outrages by pronouncing a single word in my mind. I pronounced it. The word was ‘No.’" (Atlas Shrugged)

[UntamedParticipant]

You don’t want to be married to the government but you want a law ( yay! Another law! Keep ’em comin’ ) passed through government to protect your wish for female companionship with no strings attached, is that right?
Wrong box, buddy, those were the Blue Pills!

Don't let them Blame, Shame or Tame you!
Give 'em NOTHING, not even an answer!
#GenderSegragationNow!

[StandUpGuyParticipant 334]

You can already make a contract to that effect; no new laws needed.

One more thing; Many states have common law marriages if you live with someone long enough. The state is not your friend; the state looks at you like a master looks at a slave.

[RoyDalParticipant]

StandUpGuy wrote:

The state is not your friend; the state looks at you like a master looks at a slave.

Says it for me.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[MGTOWmonkey aka No More Fucks To GiveParticipant 6635]

I have a good idea for a law,
how about women(A) gets her own place and man(B) gets his own place{section mgtow#987}
If man or woman wants sex they can VISIT residents AorB for intercourse and then proceed to get the f~~~ out!{mgtow section 989}
All exchanges are considered favors and not entitlements{mgtow section 999}
If at anytime party A(asshole) or B(boy) starts to go sour over outrageous demands by party A,then party B is allowed to freely Go His Own Way……..

Never lose sight of what brought you here.

[FrankOneParticipant 1417]

I would argue it would be better for men, if common-law marriage laws were abolished, in those States that have them (in the context of the USA). The other change, would be that men are not by default, financially responsible for children unless they sign an agreement stipulating that responsibility and its extent. And, of course, repeal of alimony.

I’d also like to see fewer single women get benefits from the State, if they can’t make enough to raise their children they are probably going to be bad examples to them, and it would be better if the kids were just put up for adoption to be raised in healthy MGTOW homes. After all, we’re going to pay for them (through taxes) to be raised in dysfunctional homes now, right?

Of course, it isn’t going to happen. Except Alimony, it may eventually be ended (my opinion) as more women pay it.

If you want to minimize your exposure you can get a vasectomy and live in a State without common law marriage, but it won’t afford 100% protection…

[FermatParticipant 3478]

Those are the blue pills talking. You know by now that long term female companionship goes to sh*t after just a few years because she’ll naturally want more out of the relationship than what she’s getting. It’s not the government that’s preventing relationships from lasting. It’s female nature that retards progress. The Wall the hormones the baby rabies the menopause post pardom depression mid life crisis feminist mentality child level maturity these are all factors that make virtually all man – woman relationships a living hell. The government is really just the physical manifestation of the protection and provision women want from men.

You could come up with the best law tomorrow with little to no loopholes and women will still find a way to use their vagina to wiggle around it. Manipulation and the need to be in control are female initiatives that will never go away. You can blame evolution if you want.

Stick to the pump and dump. After a few years with one woman they will slowly peel away their NAWALT mask and you’ll realize that your law really wasn’t necessary as the red flags will make you want leave in the short term anyway.

The last thing you want to do is create more contracts for men to sign with an uncaring government.

I have discovered a truly remarkable list of reasons why women are not necessary for a happy life, but alas this margin is too small to contain it.

[Jon the Ex-SquidParticipant 298]

A) Women wouldn’t allow that law to be passed.
B) No.

[ghostParticipant]

We don’t need any more laws unless absolutely necessary. This is the last thing you want mate. You’re not thinking long-term. I agree with all of the other brothers here. You just need to toughen up. You don’t need female companionship. Period.

[Big Viking Chef BVCParticipant 1286]

Untamed wrote:

You don’t want to be married to the government but you want a law ( yay! Another law! Keep ’em comin’ ) passed through government to protect your wish for female companionship with no strings attached, is that right?

I have to agree with Untamed here. We can’t solve the problems of today using the same thinking that caused them yesterday.

I think that all laws regarding personal choices in peoples personal lives should be abolished. Let the chips fall where they may. You might be surprised how fairly people treat each other in reaction to being treated fairly themselves. The state always gets it wrong, and has no place in making personal choices under the ‘guise of protector of some “victim”.

BVC

Swallow this RED PILL ===> Men will lay down their lives for their brothers, their women and their children. This makes Men useful as slaves. Women will lay down their lives for ONLY their children. To expect more from women is just a FANTASY created by society and reinforced by the unconditional love that we experienced from our Mothers. The key to freedom is the understanding that the woman you meet is not going to fantastically love you like your Mother did. If you buy into the fantasy, then she is your new master. If you do not buy into the fantasy, then she is nothing, and you retain your freedom.

[PhantomParticipant 3328]

All of this is still folly, even if a thousand laws were passed, and/or they were all nullified regarding marriage/divorce. A woman can still false claim rape, DV, child abuse,, and a whole slew of other baseless accusations (when they are false) and the man will still be up s~~~’s creek w/o a paddle or a pot to p~~~ in.

Equality? Is not the name of their game or on their agenda. It is about Supremacy, and getting us back on the plantation to be their bitches/slaves. They want us to be weaker and weaker (little princesses). So they can extract more resources. Check out the latest crap spewing from Taylor Swift.

Females proclaim where are all the “good men”. Translation : “Where are the suckers I can extract from”? The pussified “yes” betas that will be princesses and marry me?

FunInTheSun wrote:

The reason I’ve brought this topic up is: I still wish I could have a companion, but I also want some legal asset protection as well. I don’t want to be married to the government!

Ghost & stealth your assets. At least keep them unknown from them as much as possible. Best way to be sure they are protected is to not risk losing them to a female, provided you are never falsely accused of anything that will cost you your freedom anyway. (Because that will most likely cost you all).

Only speaking for myself here, but companionship with the modern day feminist female is an unobtainable goal. Even if you find one that claims she isn’t, the laws, society, her friends, etc., still allow her to become one on a whim at any given moment, if you do not cater to what she demands. The gun is at her disposal at any given time she wishes to whip it out and fire.

I respect you wanting companionship….that’s what are brothers in arms here at MGTOW are for.
At least, that is one of the main reasons why I am here.

Make no mistake, it is no longer Love is a battlefield (Pat Benatar song) it’s an all out war, and as much as it pains and grieves me to say it. Us men got screwed and still are, and it’s the worst sexless screw ever.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

FunInTheSun wrote:

What I’m proposing is: passing a law that allows private domestic partnerships that cannot be arbitrated by any judge if the relationship falls apart.

No.

The correct solution is to get government out of the marriage business entirely.

[BeerParticipant 11832]

sidecar wrote:

No.

The correct solution is to get government out of the marriage business entirely.

I was talking to a female friend about this recently. I told her I’m never getting married because if the wife wants to cheat she’ll do it married or not, and if she wants to leave me a divorce just means I have to pay her to leave, where as if all my assets are in my name and I don’t sign a marriage contract with her, if she wants to cheat, leave me, or just turn into a worthless bitch I can tell her to f~~~ off and it won’t cost me a dime.

She agreed with me.

[stopmockingmanParticipant 441]

Marriage Redefined
Reality Pyramid Scheme
in descending order of importance to her.
Her.
Her friends.
Her children.
Her dear parents.
The Community people.
The family pets even the fish.
Every other member of society especially anyone that does not matter like the sidewalk skank .
This is ground level_____________________________________________________________________________________________this is ground level.
This is you in a marriage, this is your status– the unseen slab of financial cement that holds her monumental status upright.
DON’T BOTHER MARRYING- it fails guaranteed.Truth.

[Author]

Posts