Mark Passio: The True Origins of Feminism

[SnakeSpectator 2080]

Not only did I watch all of Mark Passio’s Natural Law seminar, Veniversum, I listened to all 7 hours of this one as well. He rants, he touches on this and that, but the basic message is one I am sure most of us with half a brain already saw about feminism: that it is a eugenics program on steroids by international bankers to dumb down the population. Controlling the next line of useful idiots starts with the female because they are easily manipulated, and they are 80% of the consumers/spenders, i.e. necessary to keep their crony economy running.

If you don’t want to sign in to youtube, then replace the “watch?v=” in the youtube address with “v/”. It’s an easy way to get around the youtube age filter.

[TheDigestedRedPillParticipant 165]

Holy s~~~ this is a long ass video.

Society live's as if we have reached the pinnacle of human potential. Technological Advancement and Innovation, intellectualism, critical thinking is substituted for useless innovations, nasty narcissistic games, tyrannical laws that destroy the very foundation of family, and the world as we know it.

[Crazy CanuckMember 4215]

You are wrong about that. The birth of feminism was in 1848 at Seneca Falls, New York by two women. This is aka first wave feminism. It is second wave feminism that was started by the elite (The bankers) Even without the bankers feminism may have continued so women can’t really blame the bankers for the cause.
It is not that the bankers technically fooled women it’s because people are naturally greedy and will try to get what they can get. Men too have been greedy. Unions when it was mostly with men caused high inflanation and kill jobs. This is why middle class is shrinking.

http://laborunionreport.com/2011/09/10/how-unions-kill-jobs-the-union-tax/

I believe men especially middle class men caused the bankers to fund feminism. it’s people’s greed.

"If pussy was a stock it would be plummeting right now because you've flooded the market with it. You're giving it away too easy." - Dave Chapelle

[RoyDalParticipant]

Thanks for the summary brother.
True words.
Beer stein to you.

Agreed.

Regarding the origins of feminism, feminism has occurred before in many times and places. It always arose when there was a “shortage” of available men (meaning men who were top-rank providers), and the women had to fend for themselves, both financially and finding a baby-daddy.

On the other hand, when there was a surplus of available men, we witness territorial expansion, economic growth, and a flourishing of the arts and sciences. These are all things a man has to do to attract a mate when females are scarce.

India and China are in this situation today: both nations possess too many men, and too few high-status women to go around. Thus, Indian and Chinese men are working double shifts to succeed. With success, will come a mate.

The Greek hero of legend was a perfect analogue of the man-surplus. The Hollywood hero of today is an excellent example of he who feminism creates and supports.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[bigboy83Participant 11312]

Destroy the family, you shall destroy society.

C~~~s can’t think for themselves, that’s why they hover around trends, and improve their worthless social status.

Shit Tested, Cunt Approved.

[Author]

Posts