Mandalay Bay 2012 Security Guidelines: Private Security Guards Cannot Be Armed

Topic by

Home › Forums › Political Corner › Mandalay Bay 2012 Security Guidelines: Private Security Guards Cannot Be Armed

This topic contains 6 replies, has 4 voices, and was last updated by  Anonymous 2 years, 4 months ago.

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • 2017-10-02 at 4:28 PM#617701
    +2

    Anonymous
    7

    Unf~~~ing believable.
    That much money flowing and all the crazies in the word MB won’t allow their security to be armed.
    Stupid c~~~s.
    They were probably afraid of being sued but f~~~ing hell.
    I bet the get sued for not having armed security or failing to provide adequate security.

    Mandalay Bay Convention and Events Center guidelines approved in 2012 for private security personnel make clear that such guards must adhere to a ban on “weapons of any type.”
    The guidelines summarize such weapons as “guns, knives, nightsticks, mace, pepper spray, stun guns etc.,” all of which are designated as “strictly prohibited on Mandalay Bay property.”

    More Here

    2017-10-02 at 5:04 PM#617747
    +3
    Faust For Science
    Faust For Science
    Participant
    22567

    Well, the casino officials are lying. A group that handles tens of millions of dollars a day IN CASH has a private army, whom is heavily armed, guarding that cash.

    The employees on the gaming floors might not be armed. But, you can be sure that behind those “employees only” doors, that many security officials are armed to the teeth.

    2017-10-02 at 5:11 PM#617753
    +4
    GregB0
    GregB0
    Participant
    Faust For Science wrote:

    Well, the casino officials are lying. A group does handle tens of millions of dollars a day IN CASH and not have a private army, whom is heavily armed, guarding that cash.

    The employees on the gaming floors might not be armed. But, you can be sure that behind those “employees only” doors, that many security officials are armed to the teeth.

    You are correct, floor guards are basically polite bouncers and the gaurds in back have “Extreme” lethal force capabilities.

    completely different rules of engagement where the “clients” can see, as to opposed where its staff only.

    ​"​My father didn't tell me how to live; he lived, and let me watch him do it.​" - Clarence Buddinton Kelland

    2017-10-02 at 5:13 PM#617757
    +1

    Anonymous
    7

    Thx fella’s
    I just went off the article and it said security.
    Which is why I thought it was f~~~ing dumb. There is too much money around.

    2017-10-02 at 5:20 PM#617765
    +1

    Anonymous
    6

    Yea i’m not letting anybody handle that much money and they not be armed. Talk about the ultimate soft target. @Grue, you wanna plan a robbery lol.

    2017-10-02 at 5:21 PM#617767

    Anonymous
    7
    Anonymous wrote:

    Talk about the ultimate soft target. @grue, you wanna plan a robbery lol.

    LOL! Nah, I’ll let you younger fellers do that.

    2017-10-02 at 5:48 PM#617793
    +1

    Anonymous
    6
    Anonymous wrote:
    Venom wrote:

    Talk about the ultimate soft target. @grue, you wanna plan a robbery lol.

    LOL! Nah, I’ll let you younger fellers do that.

    We could totally pull it off. Ever see Ocean’s Eleven?? We could pull this job man.

    2017-10-02 at 6:04 PM#617805
    Faust For Science
    Faust For Science
    Participant
    22567
    Anonymous wrote:
    Grue wrote:
    Venom wrote:

    Talk about the ultimate soft target. @grue, you wanna plan a robbery lol.

    LOL! Nah, I’ll let you younger fellers do that.

    We could totally pull it off. Ever see Ocean’s Eleven?? We could pull this job man.

    To be honest, the job in Ocean’s Thirteen was handled far better without any obvious theft being seen as it happened until it was too late to stop the theft.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

©2020 by www.mgtow.com | All Rights Reserved.