Man, you gotta laugh..

[DeepInThoughtParticipant 2710]

Old Mick, he’s still got it…

http://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/celebrity/celebrity-news/mick-jagger-to-welcome-eighth-child-at-72-with-girlfriend-29-20160715-gq6ccy.html

[Anonymous 3]

One of the dumbest feminist narratives is insisting women were “forced” to marry old wealthy men in the past.

Ostensibly that meant that now that women are free, young women would only want young men, right?

Nope. Turns out young women like wealth, and older men always have more wealth than younger men. So, as most men with brains and experience had known, it was women talking s~~~ as usual, and it was women’s choice all along.

There is no point in women having money. It’s not like they use it on a man. And it’s not like a man would select an older woman with money over a younger woman without money either. All women in the West are doing by this method is wasting their young years and consigning most of themselves to loneliness.

But hey, works out the best for a guy like me, who never wanted marriage to begin with. It has been great for me. Thing is though, unlike women, I know I’m an outlier for not wanting a family, and am rare to have never wanted one. For the vast majority of men and women, the system that they have set up in the West is really bad for them. Especially women, oh boy did they f~~~ things up for themselves!

[Anonymous 42]

8 time looser!

[ConstantineParticipant 4420]

I am totally against men having children at that age. I think it’s one of the stupidest things you can do.

How much longer does Mick expect to be around? Even if he’s got another decade in him, that decade won’t have the pep to play soccer or climb trees with a child. And it’s certainly unlikely that he’ll be on the front lawn, waving joyously as the kid heads off to college, or even to the high school graduation. He is bound to cark it at some stage (touch wood) and then that kid will have to grow up without a dad.

It’s profoundly selfish on both of the parents’ parts. We already hear women constantly whinging about how hard it is to be a single mum. Well in that situation, she’s willingly going into that role – having a kid with someone whom she knows, or should know, is definitely going to make her a single mum in a few years’ time.

What’s the point? I couldn’t imagine losing my dad now. If I had lost him when I was six, because he insisted on having a baby with my mother despite being fifty years older than her, I would’ve had an even harder time coping.

What does it take for people to think of somebody other than themselves.

To see what is in front of one's nose requires a constant struggle. -Orwell

[xlrsnbrgParticipant 1786]

She is a single mom already, in the interview they said they don’t want to live together.

A man shouldn't make his life's objective to be on the side of the majority, but to avoid finding himself in the ranks of the insane. (Marcus Aurelius)

[ConstantineParticipant 4420]

Yeah but even so. After a certain point, he won’t even be in the kid’s life at all.

To see what is in front of one's nose requires a constant struggle. -Orwell

[Maraudrz1Participant 2250]

Constantine wrote:

How much longer does Mick expect to be around? Even if he’s got another decade in him, that decade won’t have the pep to play soccer or climb trees with a child. And it’s certainly unlikely that he’ll be on the front lawn, waving joyously as the kid heads off to college, or even to the high school graduation. He is bound to cark it at some stage (touch wood) and then that kid will have to grow up without a dad.

It’s profoundly selfish on both of the parents’ parts.

Agreed.

Women's brains and vagina have one thing in common. There is nothing in there until a man puts something in there.

[Author]

Posts