Man sues wife over $1M shoe collection

Topic by Prefer Peace to Piece

Prefer Peace to Piece

Home Forums MGTOW Central Man sues wife over $1M shoe collection

This topic contains 10 replies, has 9 voices, and was last updated by Binary Logic  Binary Logic 3 years, 11 months ago.

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #201415
    +3
    Prefer Peace to Piece
    Prefer Peace to Piece
    Participant
    10809

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2164287/Wall-Street-mogul-Daniel-Shak-sues-ex-wife-Beth-1m-shoe-collection.html

    This is funny. Daniel Shak, a Wall Street mogul, is suing his wife for 35% of her $1M shoe collection which includes more than 1200 pairs of designer shoes. Her shoes are in special closets that require a PIN number to enter.

    How would you like to be married to something like this?

    #201431
    +2
    BigD
    BigD
    Participant
    3024

    Did he marry Marco’s wife or something?

    Don't stick your dick into anyone you aren't willing to put up with for eighteen years and nine months.

    #201456
    +2
    Uchibenkei
    uchibenkei
    Participant
    7965

    technically he has a right to half

    I bathe in the tears of single moms.

    #201481
    +1
    Varun
    Varun
    Participant
    2981

    technically he has a right to half

    Does he? “Her shoes?”

    A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.

    #201490
    +1
    BigD
    BigD
    Participant
    3024

    technically he has a right to half

    Does he? “Her shoes?”

    The value of the shoes.

    Don't stick your dick into anyone you aren't willing to put up with for eighteen years and nine months.

    #201494
    Varun
    Varun
    Participant
    2981

    technically he has a right to half

    Does he? “Her shoes?”

    The value of the shoes.

    It was his money until I bought the shoes. My shoes. I don’t have his money. I ony have my shoes.

    But dear, the money with which you bought these shoes belonged to this man. So technically those are his shoes too. At least half of it is.

    Ever heard a man of wearing shoes? Haha. Shut up. MY SHOES! He didn’t wear any one of those; therefore he has no right to them.

    Your shoes but his money, right?

    No, his money has long been spent. How can I return his money? Its all been spent on my shoes. So no more of his money. Only my shoes.

    A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.

    #201495
    +3

    Anonymous
    5

    If it was a lesbian relationship then they’d want possession of half the shoes,,,the right or left shoes.
    With the Gay and lesbian marriage law changes, I can’t wait till bitches start putting bitches over the financial torture rack using the same laws they’ve been inflicting on men.
    It’ll happen,,,and it’ll be hilarious.

    #201569
    +1
    Hellraider
    hellraider
    Participant
    2837

    1 million in shoes?

    How much sex does 1 million buy with a prostitute?

    Basically a life time supply.

    This is why men should shun women and go full mgtow.

    #201573
    +1

    Anonymous
    11

    F~~~ that. I buy brand new shoes with minor defects off of eBay for 25 cents on the dollar. My last new pair had a minor scruff on the sole of one shoe.

    Ten minutes later both soles were well scruffed camouflaging the original scruff quite well.

    #201578
    +2

    Anonymous
    42

    How many f~~~ing cowhides is that?
    For one woman’s feet?
    Sorry ladies, nothing but broken glass for footwear in MG-Tower’s shoe store.

    Ladies, you’re welcome to come in and browse bleed.

    #201594
    +1
    Binary Logic
    Binary Logic
    Participant
    2351

    Honestly, I’d just ask for 1 half of each pair. Then take it and destroy it. What the hell do I need one good female shoe for? It be hard to remarket anyway… f~~~ it.

    Funny, isn't it? How women thrive on a mans time, attention and resources, while simultaneously telling him he isn't enough...

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.