Man ordered to pay more in alimony than he makes

[Prefer Peace to PieceParticipant 10809]

Man ordered to pay more in alimony than he makes.

(This article was mentioned by RealityBites- thanks RealityBites)

95-Year-Old Nebraska Man Ordered To Pay $3,300 In Alimony, Which Is More Than He Makes Each Month

A 95-Year-Old Nebraska man was ordered to pay 3,300 per month alimony, which is more than he makes every month.

Glenn’s monthly income is lower than his ex-wife’s. He pulls in $2,890 per month. Yet he has to pay his ex $3,300 per month in alimony.

Laura has a monthly income of $2,927, which is more than her husband makes. Yet she was awarded $3,300 alimony per month.

In addition to the monthly alimony payment, Glenn was forced to pay Laura for their mobile home.

It’s hard to believe how much legal power women have in society.
As sidecar said, women are nothing- it’s the law that matters. And as long as our society promotes this type of “justice”, men can literally not afford to get entangled with women. Thanks.

[J.D SilvernailParticipant 383]

I hope you’re kidding me.

I'm married to the game,but she broke her vows.

[Anonymous 18]

They wouldn’t hesitate to throw a 95-year old in prison.

Where he’d die of pneumococcal pneumonia.

And all through this she would be a victim.

At least I assume she is old enough to ruin any more lives.

The system is to blame, of course. But I don’t think a woman would turn down extra penny at any cost to the man.

[RoyDalParticipant]

RealityBites is aptly named. It is unbelievable, however true, that a nonagenarian could be defrauded in such a way, and all of it done ‘legally’ and ‘aboveboard.’

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[TheBardParticipant 974]

Why the f~~~ does she even need alimony? That is enough to live on. Ungrateful bitch.

[Anonymous 7]

If I was in this situation I would go full f~~~ing MGTOW, one hundred percent off the grid, I’d live in the woods.

[Honorable_Juice_BoxParticipant 591]

I read the article and apparently they agreed to keep their premarital assets separate…however when it comes down to determining alimony payments they take ALL assets, including the separate ones, into account.

He has $500k worth of farmland so that is the court’s justification for raping a 95 year old man in the wallet.

Even though his ex-wife makes more money then him (so alimony should be immediately off the table), he is still forced to pay her.

Apparently she blew through her savings in a retirement home and now, rather than taking responsibility for her financial mistakes, the court will force this man into poverty so she can stay comfy.

[RoyDalParticipant]

Honorable_Juice_Box wrote:

Apparently she blew through her savings in a retirement home and now, rather than taking responsibility for her financial mistakes, the court will force this man into poverty so she can stay comfy.

This makes divorce nothing but a confidence game perpetrated by the woman and enforced by the police.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[Zuberi TauParticipant 10606]

That is highway robbery!!!

[HitmanParticipant]

thank you zuberi tau….sometimes words cant express the depth of how one truly feels ..

[Sky-OParticipant 18934]

A judge being able to order a man to pay more in alimony every month than he even makes, should be illegal.

The fact that it is apparently possible and not illegal is a sign that there is currently no more logic or objectively defined law.

All that remains is disorder and chaos.

[Wolf redpillmanSpectator 1658]

Nawalt lol yeah.right but that.laws.are.like.that

[mgtow_85Participant 752]

TheBard wrote:

Why the f~~~ does she even need alimony? That is enough to live on. Ungrateful bitch.

Obviously because her monthly income may be enough to live on, but not enough for her to satisfy her shopping habit. Women would live in those stores if they had no closing hours, flaunting their money to do some “Retail therapy”. Women are known to go in debt because they spend more than they make(or their husbands can make).

[Anonymous 42]

Hypothetical: A man makes one million dollars a year, he gets married,,, one year latter she files for divorce, she’s awarded .5 million dollars a year,,, a year goes by,,, he looses his income and now only makes 50,000 a year,,, he paid all his alimony on time as ordered,,, as soon as he fails to make a payment he’s in default in the eyes of the court, and can be prosecuted for failure to pay as ordered,,, no recourse, no reduction, no nothing, he’s branded a criminal and a warrant is issued for his arrest… He’s f~~~ed!!!
Go ahead and get married, divorced, and then f~~~ed!
That’s the paradigm of modern marriage….

[Anonymous 3]

It’s men that create this and enforce it. Women can screech but if men weren’t their willing lapdogs eager to destroy other men, it would come to naught.

And again, this is something I just do not understand, but society panders to old, post-wall women. They say the reason women are valued more than men is reproductive ability, but even a 40 year old woman has less reproductive ability than a 95 year old man.

Maybe they should cut off all alimony and support to women over 40, and force them to start paying men.

[MGTOWmonkey aka No More Fucks To GiveParticipant 6635]

Im still baffled as how a man can look another man in his face and rape him like this (knowing its wrong)all for some women he’s not f~~~ing anyways.Maybe some men dont have the honor we chant about on this site,because where’s the honor in these thousands of family court houses decided by ..you guessed it MEN! How do you as a MAN look a 95 y/o in the face and feel this is justified with your inherited logic? These politicians and judges are the enemy to man,a women wouldn’t have a leg to stand on without them like our US president stating women are smarter than men to a clapping audience looking fresh from the Steve Harvey Show. This post p~~~es me off,im going back to glance back at Z Tau post ^^^,he understands how I feel.

Never lose sight of what brought you here.

[hellraiderParticipant 2837]

This is the kind of crap that makes me sick to my core.

This is an orwelian nightmare of a society we live on.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Prefer Peace to Piece wrote:

And as long as our society promotes this type of “justice”

Notice they don’t call it a “justice” system anymore.
It’s just called the “legal system” now.

Big f~~~ing difference.

Make no mistake. She has no f~~~ing “power”. Women have the “power” to permanently end this s~~~ — OVERNIGHT. But they simply refuse to do it. The legal system exploits female greed and selfishness for profit.

Think about it.

Let’s pretend Robin Williams were alive again. When the judge orders him to pay that greedy selfish c~~~ $35 million in vaginamony, a woman now has all the POWER to say “F~~~ YOU. I DON’T NEED OR WANT $35 MILLION. WHATEVER YOU ORDER HIM TO PAY I WILL GIVE MOST OF IT BACK. FIVE MILLION WILL BE MORE THAN ENOUGH AND I WILL BE GRATEFUL FOR IT. I WILL GIVE HIM $30 MILLION BACK. YOU HAVE NO SAY IN THE MATTER.”.

That woman would change the world and the legal system forever. Single-handedly.

The “legal system” would be so f~~~ed over and it would set a precedent.

But no woman will ever do it, because they don’t have “power”. They are WEAK and selfish and greedy. The legal system knows this. And they would rather see a legendary man suicide himself. It’s f~~~ing disgusting. I would say they should be ashamed of themselves, if I thought they had the capacity for it.

The legal system is not a justice system.

“Justice” would be paying that bitch $35 million, and then suing her for everything because she broke her marriage vows. For richer or for poorer. In sickness and in health. For better or for worse. All bulls~~~. Now someone else decides you are expected to pay that c~~~ for being a s~~~ty wife? SUE. THAT. C~~~. FOR. FRAUDULENTLY MISREPRESENTING HERSELF as marriageable.

$250 million to Tiger Wood’s ex-wife for beating him with a golf club?
No man ever collected $5 for that.

That’s not “power”. Women don’t’ know the first thing about it.
She will even take more than he earns and feel good about it. Even if it kills him.

They don’t give a S~~~.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[narwhalParticipant]

I pulled up the article, and this is actually a little different then it looks on the surface. The ex-wife is in a nursing home, not a retirement home. Meaning that she isn’t living the good life on her ex’s dime. The ex husband is still a relative winner in this case, though probably not as much as he had hoped by proceeding with a divorce.

If the couple had stayed married, the nursing home would have ate through all of the man’s assets rather quickly. He was paying $6230 a month for expenses (mostly going to the nursing home). Now he is only paying $3300, only half that much. He is not splitting his land assets with her, as they were owned pre-marriage. He is forced to reimburse her for the mobile home which was heard pre-marriage, he lives in now, while she does not.

So why didn’t she go for the interest on his land assets? Personally, I don’t think she is trying to screw her ex over. I’m not even sure the couple don’t want to be a couple anymore.

The fact is the nursing home/medical industry was going to suck him dry. The money is really nothing to her, as it’s all going to go straight to the nursing home anyway. But legally, she can’t be kicked out of the home. So the smart thing to do was to cut off the nursing home’s access to his assets, or try to anyway. The legal system isn’t looking out for her in this case, they are looking out for the nursing home. In some ways, this is a compromise. The nursing home doesn’t get full access to his funds, but still gets a steady stream of revenue from the patient (indirectly).

I don’t know how I feel about this. From the medical industries point of view, it sucks for them be forced to provide service, yet cannot get fully paid. They overcharge and have lots of other issues, they are no angel. I fully understand the man’s POV. I would not want all my assets getting pulled away from me like this. I have no doubt he was hoping to leave those assets to his children, and it doesn’t look like that’s going to happen.

From my personal experience, my father divorced my mother about a year and a half before he died. It wasn’t done for financial reasons, but it had a huge financial impact. My mother was not responsible for any of his bills, and that would have set her back tremendously. She had a well off aunt that died a bit after that, and she was able to keep all the inheritance, instead of having to payoff my Dad’s bills. I don’t want to think about what situation she would be in now if she had to pay those bills.

As for that rich aunt, she was a whole lot richer before she started a massing huge bills.

I see this as just another f~~~ed up aspect of marriage that needs to be corrected. Even if you do find a unicorn, unless she’s financially well off or has a quick death, you’re going to get screwed. There needs to be a way for 2 people to live together and such without tying them together financially. Women need to be educated from early on about taking care of themselves financially, the same way men are. Men need to look at a woman’s financial outlook more so then any other character trait.

Ok. Then do it.

[ALPHA MALE!Participant 29]

…this bulls~~~ isn’t law …call it for what it is…EXTORTION!!!

...I'm an Alpha Male, not a bitch!!!

[Author]

Posts