Males vs. Females: Sexual Conflict

Topic by Blue Skies

Blue Skies

Home Forums Philosophy Males vs. Females: Sexual Conflict

This topic contains 11 replies, has 10 voices, and was last updated by NotMyProblem  NotMyProblem 3 years, 11 months ago.

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #193317
    +1
    Blue Skies
    Blue Skies
    Participant
    15665

    video explains the reproductive urges of animals including humans. The end of the video mentions the purpose of a wedding ring…hahaha
    what are your thoughts about how this scientific reasoning relates to mgtow.

    MGTOW is not a movement, it is a way of life.

    #193345
    +3
    Biggvs_Dickvs
    Biggvs_Dickvs
    Participant
    3725

    For married men, the ring is definitely a way to mark his territory. DeBeers seized upon this in the thirteis and exploited it in true Bernaysian (google Edward Bernays) fashion and turned it into phallic arms race where the bigger the diamond, the bigger your claim over your chosen female, and probably the bigger the penis in the freudian sense.

    Women make kind of a deal out of the ring, but really it’s her reminder to herself of property ownership. And to other women to a certain extent.

    Still doesn’t change the fact that hypergamy exists and is rampant. The real game changer is DNA analysis. No matter how sure you are that your children are yours, you should still ALWAYS check. If you’re worried about her freaking out about it, just get two kits from Ancestry.com and tell the little lady that you just want to let your kids explore their combined heritage through DNA.

    If she freaks about her kids finding out about their heritage, you know you have a problem.

    /glad I already did my kid’s DNA test. There wasn’t really any/much doubt, but still, it’s SUPER nice to be able to say it definitively.

    "Data, I would be delighted to offer any advice I can on understanding women. When I have some, I'll let you know." --Captain Picard,

    #193371
    +2
    Hmskl'd
    hmskl’d
    Participant
    6406

    guilded form of guarding our mate

    The materialism associated with the upcoming “spring wedding blitz” where the bride to be, her ring and the promised blissful future which is carefully marketed to appear as some sort of prize.

    It reminds me of the old toothless carnival barker I walked past as a child. He looked at me on the midway and uttered those famous words “prize every time” .. he actually tried to steer me and my dollar towards the floating duck pond. We’ve all seen the duck fishing pond where there are two-hundred or more floating plastic birds that you can fish for and, as a child, it only costs your last dollar.

    So we have two hundred ducks each painted with a number on the bottom, One-hundred-ninety-nine of these ducks win you a tiny piece of plastic or temporary paper tattoo worth probably a fraction of one cent and the one bird out of two hundred gives you a stuffed animal.

    Let’s say for the sake of argument that you happen to draw the one bird with the winning number for the larger prize. We’ve been conditioned to believe that big stuffed prize you carry around the midway is of value. That stuffed animal has been dragged from carnival to carnival and is probably covered with layers dust or has been hanging out in the sun so long it’s old, brittle and faded.

    Such is with the marketing of spring romance, weddings and associated contractual relationships sealed with a rock on her finger. Sure, it’s carefully managed to look spectacular and can literally cost tens of thousands of dollars. It’s big business and there is money to be made – and lost.

    Is it worth your last dollar to play the game that is clearly rigged against you and do you really want that prize? How long does it last and even if you nab an exotic one, how many layers of smelly old carousel dust has it acquired during it’s time spent hopping from midway to midway. You just can’t ever go wrong by avoiding both carnivals and wedding rings.

    #193380
    +4
    ILiveAgain
    ILiveAgain
    Participant

    Have you seen the s~~~ MEN have to dig through to get a diamond?

    It should be the men getting the fk8ng ring.

    MEN die doing that s~~~.

    Fk her and her fking ring.

    #193390
    +2
    Blue Skies
    Blue Skies
    Participant
    15665

    the video also talks about how the more effort men put into chasing women, the harder it is to reproduce with women.

    “the more promiscuous males are, the choosier the females”

    MGTOW is not a movement, it is a way of life.

    #193397
    +4
    Nerdtastic
    Nerdtastic
    Participant
    194

    Women are so bad that my step dad when he was first divorced he still wore his ring when he went to bars. The women would still come up to him and flirt and wanna go home with him. Ring just means more attention : /

    #193399
    +3
    The road
    the road
    Participant
    3125

    How does this relate to us? Ever since I took the red pill, my desire to be in a relationship and get married plummeted to zero.

    The “sexual arms race” evolved and spread into government and now women have the advantage with laws stacked in their favor. I wonder if the next male evolution is the creation of MGTOW… seems pretty obvious that it is.

    #MANOUT

    #193414
    +4
    Jan Sobieski
    Jan Sobieski
    Participant
    28791

    Women are so bad that my step dad when he was first divorced he still wore his ring when he went to bars. The women would still come up to him and flirt and wanna go home with him. Ring just means more attention : /

    Wearing a ring means the man is…

    1. Already broken in spirt. Used to obeying females.

    2. Already trained.

    3. Already been selected. That means some female picked him so he must have value over the other men.

    4. If she can seduce him / steal him it means her sex market value is greater than his wife. She is sexier than at least one other female.

    Basically it means someone thought the man was valuable enough to trap. So he must be valuable enough to try to steal.

    Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

    #193457
    +1

    the video also talks about how the more effort men put into chasing women, the harder it is to reproduce with women.

    “the more promiscuous males are, the choosier the females”

    It’s funny and true. The only reason women can be so picky is because men are throwing themselves at women. Look at herbivore men in Japan. They have these women called carnivore women that are more aggressive about dating men over there because men have totally checked out of society. Women hold only as much power as we let them. If you don’t chase after them, then they will be less picky.

    Feminism is a movement where opinions are presented as facts and emotions are presented as evidence.

    #193465
    Blue Skies
    Blue Skies
    Participant
    15665

    Women hold only as much power as we let them. If you don’t chase after them, then they will be less picky.

    to put it in better terms…….if you don’t chase after them, then they will be desperate.

    MGTOW is not a movement, it is a way of life.

    #193488
    +1
    WhackerGuy2030
    WhackerGuy2030
    Participant
    999

    You can never stifle the market. In this case, the market has been so corrupted and tilted in favor of women that more and more men are choosing to not participate. There can be no power when there are no players to take from, no matter how much advantage.

    #193507
    +1
    NotMyProblem
    NotMyProblem
    Participant
    965

    Thanks $aver that was interesting. Modern relationships are one big power battle. Much happier just avoiding them.

    Not my property... Not my problem

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.