Male Contraceptive 'Pills' to hit stores by 2018

[Zuberi TauParticipant 10606]

http://www.ibtimes.com/male-contraceptive-pills-could-hit-store-shelves-2018-provide-10-years-protection-1981834

A contraceptive “pill” that could provide protection to men could hit the market shelves by 2018. The pill reportedly will provide protection for a continuous period of 10 years and will be the first clinically approved contraception method for men since condoms.

Looks like the coup de grace is about to be delivered to the trollops and child support hustlers.

[DurdenParticipant 1051]

There will be the discussion and debate if government should cover the expenses.

Those in favor of it It will be argued that females already have it paid for. In secret and some may do so out loud (with dire consequences to their reputations) that doing such would reduce the amount of single mothers and thus less hand outs and less jail birds.

Those against will do so for selfish reasons for fear they will lose power. Which they will.  They should be planning a tactical retreat or bargaining table. But they are too emotional and short sighted for that logic. They will argue that a there is also hormonal implications and the pill is not only about birth control. They will lose the question is a matter of how long it will take.

It's only after we've lost everything that we're free to do anything

[RoyDalParticipant]

The current climate is so hysterically anti-male, I don’t see any real protection from the pill. There is already a body of case law that forced men who were not biological fathers must pay child support. Abstinence is the only real protection from false prosecutions, be they for rape or paternity.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[Soldier-MedicParticipant 2566]

The issue would be cost.  Injecting directly into the Vas Deferense doesn’t sound that straight forward.  Then there’s guys that want to reverse it later after hooking up with the supposed unicorns.

Insurance companies may only pay for the injections for birth control then reversal at a finite amount.  Say one each every two to three years.  Whereas women can go on and off the pills whenever they see fit, or if they think they can shoplift a well monied man’s DNA.

I think we may see women’s rights advocates pairing or at least not arguing with religious and traditionalist groups to block releasing it to the public and insuring this.  Traditionalists will probably fear male contraception.  They desire a return to the ‘old ways’ and that a woman can be a brood mare is part and parcel of their vision of nirvana.

"I asked you a question. I didn't ask you to repeat what the voices in you head are telling you" ~ Me. ........Yes I'm still angry.

The issue would be cost.  Injecting directly into the Vas Deferense doesn’t sound that straight forward.  Then there’s guys that want to reverse it later after hooking up with the supposed unicorns.

Insurance companies may only pay for the injections for birth control then reversal at a finite amount.  Say one each every two to three years.  Whereas women can go on and off the pills whenever they see fit, or if they think they can shoplift a well monied man’s DNA.

I think we may see women’s rights advocates pairing or at least not arguing with religious and traditionalist groups to block releasing it to the public and insuring this.  Traditionalists will probably fear male contraception.  They desire a return to the ‘old ways’ and that a woman can be a brood mare is part and parcel of their vision of nirvana.

[DurdenParticipant 1051]

RoyDal wrote:

The current climate is so hysterically anti-male, I don’t see any real protection from the pill. There is already a body of case law that forced men who were not biological fathers must pay child support. Abstinence is the only real protection from false prosecutions, be they for rape or paternity.

Those who pay child support who are not biological fathers and pay put themselves in that position. Whether they were tricked or decided to become a father to a single mothers children. This will reduce the amount of pregnancies. Now I guess you could argue that stupid people will not use it because they are stupid. But it will still reduce a lot of these false claims and shed more light on to this subject.

It's only after we've lost everything that we're free to do anything

[Anonymous 3]

They’ve been saying it’s 2 years away now for 2 decades. Possibly even longer. I’ll believe it when I see it.

 

[ILiveAgainParticipant]

The feminists stopped the last male pill going to market.

They will try again because as stated …. it’s about ‘control’

Remember ‘equality’ is not the issue. It’s not about ‘balance’ ….. CONTROL CONTROL CONTROL.

The male pill will stop the gravy train for women. Paternity fraud will dissappear ….. on a physical level ….. but not a legal one.

But the biggest issue for the feminists is it’s a huge step towards real equality. The very thing they absolutely don’t want.

Should the male pill go to market …. they will have to do some serious Jedi Mind Tricks with family law in order to keep the pay days coming.

That alone will start people asking ….. WTF …. that’s insane … how can a man that is ‘sterile’ pay child support for another mans child.

As has been said …. the only 99.99% certain way is ….. don’t go near women …. and don’t f~~~ them 😆

[IGMOW (I Go My Own Way)Participant 2572]

ILiveAgain wrote:

The feminists stopped the last male pill going to market. They will try again because as stated …. it’s about ‘control’

Anyone have any articles on this? I would like to do research into this.

"I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.

[Anonymous 3]

Men were supposed to be the sex to have restraint. But Western men just chase pussy like desperate dogs and even take pride in it. It’s sad how low the male has fallen in a mere 40 some odd years.

MGTOW are the last masculine Western men. I wonder if there is some sort of subliminal messaging in TV and media. I do not watch TV or consume media, and I’m not thirsty like most men. Men of previous generations also did not watch TV because it did not exist. The thirst really started with TV, got bigger with education and other media.

[ILiveAgainParticipant]

IGMOW (I Go My Own Way) wrote:

ILiveAgain wrote:

The feminists stopped the last male pill going to market. They will try again because as stated …. it’s about ‘control’

Anyone have any articles on this? I would like to do research into this.

https://yoube.com/JymN5yu-K_o

Sorry its in Brazilian but subtitles

[Biggvs_DickvsParticipant 3725]

Anonymous wrote:

They’ve been saying it’s 2 years away now for 2 decades. Possibly even longer. I’ll believe it when I see it.

Vasalgel is (I assume) what everyone is talking about:  http://www.parsemusfoundation.org/vasalgel-home/ and it is definitely a reality. It has been tested on baboons with a 100% reduction in conception, and similar results in humans in India.

Please consider supporting them – it’s a crowdfunded operation and may face a lot of political opposition although I suspect some pretty heavy hitters will come to bat in it’s defense. After all, if women have the right to control their own reproduction, why shouldn’t we?

 

"Data, I would be delighted to offer any advice I can on understanding women. When I have some, I'll let you know." --Captain Picard,

[Biggvs_DickvsParticipant 3725]

I also want to add that this will put the anti-male crowd in a bit of a bind. One of their main oh-woe-is-me talking points is that the burden of birth control is almost entirely on the women.  If they backpedal once it becomes available for men they will have some ‘splaining to do.

So basically we will either get male birth control or the world will get undeniable proof of true repression of men in American society.

I see it as a win-win.

 

"Data, I would be delighted to offer any advice I can on understanding women. When I have some, I'll let you know." --Captain Picard,

[sidecarParticipant 35842]

Biggvs_Dickvs wrote:

After all, if women have the right to control their own reproduction, why shouldn’t we?

Why indeed?

But greedy, selfish, evil feminists don’t see it that way. Right now it’s a woman’s sole right to choose and a man’s sole responsibility to pay, and THAT’S EXACTLY THE WAY THEY WANT TO KEEP IT. They want to have their cake and eat it to and force men to pay the bill.

Just look at what they did to Dr. Elsimar Coutinho.

[experiencedParticipant]

It’s all about c_nt-roll

"It seems like there's times a body gets struck down so low, there ain't a power on earth that can ever bring him up again. Seems like something inside dies so he don't even want to get up again. But he does."

[Won'tGetFooledAgainParticipant 3293]

“<span style=”color: #000000; font-family: Georgia, ‘Times New Roman’, Times, serif; line-height: 26px;”>The new male contraceptive is not actually a pill. It is actually a gel which can be injected into the vas deferens of a male under local anesthesia”</span>

I think a lot of men have a fear of a doctor sticking a needle anywhere near there so I think the take up rate will be pretty low.  I personally think if you are going to go for this, you may as well just get a vasectomy to be sure.

An actual birth control pill would not be allowed to be produced as it would take the power away from women instantly and put men back in control. The marriage rate is constantly dropping as more and more men refuse to get married, so the only card women hold now is that they can still decide to trap a guy by getting pregnant.  We know once a woman gets baby rabies she will lie about being on the pill or just plain steal a mans sperm to get pregnant. She will convince herself that this behavior is OK as the man deep down wanted to be a father.  When men can f~~~ any woman they like with no intention of marrying her or worry of getting her pregnant it will basically prove that the only use a woman has to a man is for sex.

For women, everything eventually boils down to Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks.

[WolfParticipant 890]

Durden wrote:

Those who pay child support who are not biological fathers and pay put themselves in that position. Whether they were tricked or decided to become a father to a single mothers children. This will reduce the amount of pregnancies. Now I guess you could argue that stupid people will not use it because they are stupid. But it will still reduce a lot of these false claims and shed more light on to this subject.

I agree. If you don’t act in place of a father, then you won’t be forced to take the financial responsibility of one.

I think it will be great when male contraceptive hits the market. Of course, there will be males who don’t use it, but there will also be males who do. Logically speaking, this will reduce the number of unplanned pregnancies in our society.

 

[Author]

Posts