Low Birthrate = more responsibility for men, less for women

[Nags4CashParticipant 1163]

I often hear comments about the general stupidity of people that crank out endless babies, but based on the recent birth rate numbers we need them.

https://www.vox.com/science-and-health/2018/5/22/17376536/fertility-rate-united-states-births-women

Our birth rate is now 1.76 births per womans lifetime. That means that the current citizens of the country, if this trend continues, have a negative growth rate. This also means that the ratio of citizens to immigrants would become less favorable, as the immigration rate exceeds our birth rate.

In that article, i found this fantastic gem:
…the economist Lyman Stone, have suggested America’s “historic collapse in childbearing” is being driven by the fact that society isn’t organized to support women having all the babies they’d like to.

Nowhere in the article are men mentioned in the equation. It’s all about, women working, womens financial needs, women needing support after pregnancy, the desires of men are totally and completely ignored. If this kind of birth rate sink continues, it could, without any outside input, inspire law changes to further help womens needs to encourage birth.

I was hoping that there was a chance we could see male financial abortion of babies soon. That is completely out the window, because women’s needs for babies outweigh equal rights in the eyes of everyone but mgtow men.

Were you dreaming that one day alimony would be removed? Keep dreaming. Now, more than ever, women need a reason to get married and have babies.

Were you hoping child support might possibly become fair in the coming years? Not if the birthrate doesn’t correct itself. It might even get worse, because all of the fixes to birthrate will exclusively target making women want to have babies more.

Men are, as usual, nothing more than a worthless side show whose sole purpose is to shut up and do his duty. If the birth rate keeps dropping, that will become even more evident. Even the mgtow who choose not to participate will start having more and more tax money dedicated to paying for the ladies babies to recover the birth rate.

Murph ~ There is nothing brave or manly about entering into a contract with somebody which allows them to take your money, assets, children, and decades of your future income on a mere whim.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Nags4Cash wrote:

I often hear comments about the general stupidity of people that crank out endless babies, but based on the recent birth rate numbers we need them.

Do we really need them?

What for?

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

Women are working more than ever and have better jobs than men. There is far more room for advancement for women.

It is already happening that more men are getting alimony and more custody. With more custody comes lower child support orders.

I recommend looking out for yourselves boys and if you have to marry, you just haavvvee to…marry rich or don’t marry at all.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[Nags4CashParticipant 1163]

sidecar wrote:

Nags4Cash wrote:

I often hear comments about the general stupidity of people that crank out endless babies, but based on the recent birth rate numbers we need them.

Do we really need them?

What for?

Well, WE don’t need them, because i doubt most of us care if the whole species goes extinct. Governments go into panick mode if the population starts shrinking though, and they’ll start offering things to fix it.

Murph ~ There is nothing brave or manly about entering into a contract with somebody which allows them to take your money, assets, children, and decades of your future income on a mere whim.

[SH3LLZParticipant 5569]

NO F*CKS GIVEN! 2018! YEAR OF THE VASECTOMY!!!!

F*CK THESE WHORES! MY LIFE IS MINE!

#ICETHEMOUT
#MANOUT
#HIDEYOURWEALTH!!!

#ICETHEMOUT!!! #MANOUT!!! #HIDEYOURWEALTH #VAGINAISWORTHLESS

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

Everything is more responsibility for men.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[AttonParticipant]

Nowhere in the article are men mentioned in the equation. It’s all about, women working, womens financial needs, women needing support after pregnancy

That is how you know they missed the mark.

If you want a birth rate you improve the quality of the voters. For example we don’t allow sex offenders, near schools so why allow tax avoiding, indebted, draft dodgers near a ballot box. In the words of Obama, when you select a doctor you would want the most qualified person to offer treatment.
Why not allow those who happen to assume accountability in regards to taxes, service and more to steer the direction of said country? That group of people who happen to do everything and hold up the sky, who might they be?

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Nags4Cash wrote:

Governments go into panick mode if the population starts shrinking though,

Only governments that rely on economic expansion through population expansion to generate a surplus to cover the various ponzi schemes they’ve used to buy votes.

But then population expansion only works for so long at expanding an economy before diminishing returns turn it into a liability and not an asset. From there the ponzi schemes, government, and likely society will fail within a generation.

But then governments like that should fail.

and they’ll start offering things to fix it.

Which only ever make the problems worse. because that’s all government ever do: make things worse and more bureaucratic.

[Branched offParticipant 10971]

It is so heartening to read the posts of other men who get it. Sometimes I feel completely alone when I say these things. Much truth has been written here.

When you are in a hole stop digging. Women’s “liberation” (to join the ranks of tax payers paying for the big socialist state) has resulted in their having less children. It is a fact even a libtard could not dispute. The socialist state is the problem but this article sees it as the solution. It thinks we need more regulation and more tax payers money spent to “free” women to have more children. They pyramid scheme of the socialist state is crumbling. We need to leave it tp crumble.

Women will have more children when they see it as in their interest to do so. That will be when family is the source of strength not the state when a life’s effort is better invested in children than in earning money to spend on clothes, holidays and cars, knowing that the great father state will care for all your ills.

A woman is like fire -fun to play with, can warm you through and cook your food, needs constant feeding, can burn you and consume all you own

[iMickey503Participant 12465]

Wait, so all those TEEN pregnancies are not keeping things going?

WUT???

You are all alone. If you have been falsely accused of RAPE, DV, PLEASE let all men know about the people who did this. http://register-her.net/web/guest/home

[CarnageParticipant 22113]

Well, I agree with them.

Why? Because their “women support” plan is wrong and I wold like things to get f~~~ed up.

F~~~ you US… actually F~~~ YOU PLANET EARTH.

To those following me, be careful, I just farted. Men those beans are killers.

[Anonymous 42]

Comes a time when a man must abandon all hope, that time was 50 years ago!

You reap what you sew! The law shall not be molested, perverted, and mocked!

Time for the western feminized cultures to perish in the flames of their own creation.

[Anonymous 12]

more responsibility for men
=
more power for men

don´t share your juice.
he who does not share it, controls it.
be in charge.

[Fast OrelParticipant 110]

The article contains the word “women” 16 times.

As you can guess, the word “men” is used exactly.. 0 times.

Of courses the author can’t explain why the birthrate is dropping, she willingly removed half of the equation !

She describes herself as an “evidence enthusiast”… Yeah right.

https://www.vox.com/authors/julia-belluz

[Anonymous 12]

Anonymous wrote:

more responsibility for men
=
more power for men

don´t share your juice.
he who does not share it, controls it.
be in charge.

I’ve always seen so called “Male Privilege” as being a slave with a masters responsibility. Women on the other hand “top from the bottom” they call all the shots but have the advantage of zero responsibility as well.

[MonkParticipant 17042]

Nags4Cash wrote:

I often hear comments about the general stupidity of people that crank out endless babies, but based on the recent birth rate numbers we need them.

The optimum world population is in the low millions.

From the article:

… the economist Lyman Stone, have suggested America’s “historic collapse in childbearing” is being driven by the fact that society isn’t organized to support women having all the babies they’d like to”.

Society encourages females – the trashier the better – to have children.

From the elites point of view, it’s not a crisis, it’s a riproaring, runaway success.

[Anonymous 1]

The low birthrate is caused by Feminism. Its simple really. Women have been taught to wear power suits and get a career. THEY DON’T WANT BABIES.

When they hit 40 years old they have regrets and go for the IVF treatment have themselves a nice “down syndrome” baby and bankrupt everybody around them caring for it.

Men have become nothing, but sperm donors and ATMs in the current system.

The only women having lots of babies are the ones exploiting the welfare system. WELFARE QUEENS. These babies grow up in a toxic environment and usually become criminals.

In short, this is how civilization breaks down. Feminism killed it.

[bigboy83Participant 11312]

Women create a problem, then blame men.

Rense and repeat.

Shit Tested, Cunt Approved.

[Joey AlfioParticipant]

Nags4Cash wrote:

I often hear comments about the general stupidity of people that crank out endless babies, but based on the recent birth rate numbers we need them.

Bulls~~~. Bulls~~~. Bulls~~~!!!

We need them for what? Have you not been raised in the system? Do you know how hopelessly futile it is for any change unless there’s a total collapse? When you say we need them all you’re saying is we’re running out of meat for the grinder. The system is going to s~~~ as it is and will continue to spiral downwards until the imminent collapse.

We don’t need s~~~. Only tradcucks say make babies or keep voting right in dreams of a political solution when throughout these years nothing has happened for the better and nothing will unless men are in charge again and which parties do you see pushing for that agenda? Where do you even hear them mentioning limiting women’s rights? Yea I thought so.

As far as immigrants go — I could care less. We’re not to blame nor should we feel bad about it. At least migrants put their women in their place….can we say the same about ourselves? A culture that keeps their c~~~s in check is and will be the most dominant one. That is written.

Δεν υπάρχει τίποτε αδύνατο γι’ αυτόν που θα προσπαθήσει. - Μέγας Αλέξανδρος

[Can’t Stump TrumpParticipant]

Joey Alfio wrote:

We need them for what? Have you not been raised in the system? Do you know how hopelessly futile it is for any change unless there’s a total collapse?

Damn right. Babies are needed to keep a civilization alive, but sometimes civilization is beyond saving. If you have babies nowadays, you may be dooming them to experience the zombie apocalypse.

Women are better at multitasking? Fucking up several things at once is not multitasking.

[Author]

Posts