Lilith is a succubus?! A Demon girl?! And Eve isn't?!

[Colin Combover in a ComaParticipant 5068]

It seems to me to be quite a coincidence that the Gospels were written appox during the time of the Jewish revolt.
Also most of the Pauline doctrine goes against the teachings of Jesus.

[UnKnownSurvivingParticipant 173]

I’m bit familiar with Book of Enoch, because it’s very ancient. Enoch is from the time of Adam. Not much is known about him, except he was vanish in the hand of God. I suspect he will return to earth. Enoch and The prophet Elijah will return, because they have not experience death. The timing is unknown.

Gospel of Mark is still connected with the Bible. Everyone else is new.

I wouldn’t quite trust the book of Mormon, because it’s from the time of American 1830. The origin of that text is unknown. Not ancient. Because the origin isn’t America. Israel is. It’s not correct. In the dispera of Israel, after Jerusalem was sacked by the Romans, and previous first temple was destroyed, by Israel’s previous enemy Babylonians, the four corner of the Earth was filled with Jews. Jews of many nations. The timeline is interrupted.

Gospel of Thomas and the Gospel of Mary is unfamiliar to me, and may be incorrect. The history of it, that is. The Gospel of Mary isn’t classed as one of the Gospel in Jesus’s time, since it was written in Greek in 2nd Century. Mary is central name of in Jesus’s time, so it is strange, that such relationship will have her become as one of the apostle, when it is disagreeable in Ancient times. Women are known to bring down nations, because of their beauty, but their heart is fickle and deceptive. And Apostle Peter disagree with a woman as one of the apostles of Jesus. She cannot be greater than the male apostles.

The Gospel of Mary is often interpreted as a Gnostic text. So, the Gospel of Mary is unknown and false. As with the Gospel of Thomas. Similar situation of unknown authors. It’s not recognized, since it’s far from the time of Jesus. A Gnostic text is a modern name for a variety of ancient religious ideas and systems, originating in Jewish-Christian milieus in the first and second century AD.

I mean, it’s not completely valid. It’s only happened after Jesus, not during. All the works of Bible that is part of the New Testament happened during the time of Jesus. Not after.

"I come in Peace. I didn't bring Artillery. But I'm pleading with you with tears in my eyes, if you fuck with me, I'll kill you all." - Gen. Marine Mattis Mad DOG

[UnKnownSurvivingParticipant 173]

Well, Ranger one. I will actually study witchery to understand it, as well as vampirism, or Lycanthrope, and to use as knowledge, but I’m not a practicer of it, because I’m not a Satanist. Very few Satanists, get out of that group.

Satanic Groups like any other gangs, have rules of their own, and it’s similar. Just slightly different. Once you join satanic group, you can’t get out. They have their own codes. If you attempt to leave, they will kill you.

I’m not a practicer of witchery. I just know things, when I was studying. I just don’t go that far. However, there are a few ex-Satanists, rare, just not on here. Again, I’m not a Satanist.

I will have nothing to do as actually doing it.

"I come in Peace. I didn't bring Artillery. But I'm pleading with you with tears in my eyes, if you fuck with me, I'll kill you all." - Gen. Marine Mattis Mad DOG

[Colin Combover in a ComaParticipant 5068]

UnKnownSurviving wrote:

I’m bit familiar with Book of Enoch, because it’s very ancient. Enoch is from the time of Adam. Not much is known about him, except he was vanish in the hand of God. I suspect he will return to earth. Enoch and The prophet Elijah will return, because they have not experience death. The timing is unknown.

Gospel of Mark is still connected with the Bible. Everyone else is new.

I wouldn’t quite trust the book of Mormon, because it’s from the time of American 1830. The origin of that text is unknown. Not ancient. Because the origin isn’t America. Israel is. It’s not correct. In the dispera of Israel, after Jerusalem was sacked by the Romans, and previous first temple was destroyed, by Israel’s previous enemy Babylonians, the four corner of the Earth was filled with Jews. Jews of many nations. The timeline is interrupted.

Gospel of Thomas and the Gospel of Mary is unfamiliar to me, and may be incorrect. The history of it, that is. The Gospel of Mary isn’t classed as one of the Gospel in Jesus’s time, since it was written in Greek in 2nd Century. Mary is central name of in Jesus’s time, so it is strange, that such relationship will have her become as one of the apostle, when it is disagreeable in Ancient times. Women are known to bring down nations, because of their beauty, but their heart is fickle and deceptive. And Apostle Peter disagree with a woman as one of the apostles of Jesus. She cannot be greater than the male apostles.

The Gospel of Mary is often interpreted as a Gnostic text. So, the Gospel of Mary is unknown and false. As with the Gospel of Thomas. Similar situation of unknown authors. It’s not recognized, since it’s far from the time of Jesus. A Gnostic text is a modern name for a variety of ancient religious ideas and systems, originating in Jewish-Christian milieus in the first and second century AD.

I mean, it’s not completely valid. It’s only happened after Jesus, not during. All the works of Bible that is part of the New Testament happened during the time of Jesus. Not after.

No-one really knows who wrote the Gospels, why were they written approx. 30years after the death of Christ? What happened to those people before the gospel were written, who never heard of Christianity(the true source, not the Roman version), who lived in lands the apostles never visited?
I advocate reading the Pseudepigrapha, Apocrypha and Sacred Writings. These contain many works such as: The book of Jubilees, Life of Adam and Eve, and the Secret Gospel of Mark

[UnKnownSurvivingParticipant 173]

Well, those people were murdered or killed for following Jesus. Or even believing in him, and some of those were Romans. Gentiles. It comes from the Romans who called them “Christ-ians”, as more of an insult than intended name. It wasn’t meant to be a religion, you see. During the time, of Roman empire, Gentiles were learning ancient Judaism, and they were former Romans. Unfortunately, Roman soldiers didn’t like their own people disappearing into the new culture, of which is Israel. So, they brutally separated them. And eventually, during the time of Jesus, and after, Apostle Peter ( and Later, another fellow, Apostle Paul, formerly Saul, of jewish ancestry, also worked with Romans/Gentiles) worked with Gentiles, have had discussions with them, which later resulted in gaining more members of in Christ, and becoming Christians, as the Romans returned to their homeland.

Of course, sadly, the rest of them who returned to their homeland were not welcome back into their own country. We have the Colosseum, which became theater of death for Christians, often killed by Gladiators or mauled by lions of malnutritions. This is the first death. The first death is nothing. The second death is worse. The second death is hell. There’s no returning to God, and that’s end of the line, and there’s no getting out.

There’s lot of it still missing, in historical aspect, though, the bible is very much completed. Just too much information to be written, or the bible could be so overwhelming, that the book could so thick to read everything. so, it make sense to break it up.

"I come in Peace. I didn't bring Artillery. But I'm pleading with you with tears in my eyes, if you fuck with me, I'll kill you all." - Gen. Marine Mattis Mad DOG

[UnKnownSurvivingParticipant 173]

Colin Combover in a Coma wrote:

No-one really knows who wrote the Gospels, why were they written approx. 30years after the death of Christ? What happened to those people before the gospel were written, who never heard of Christianity(the true source, not the Roman version), who lived in lands the apostles never visited?

Yes. I agree. What happened? Did someone stripped of it, or was it too much? Though, I agree with the books:

Colin Combover in a Coma wrote:

I advocate reading the Pseudepigrapha, Apocrypha and Sacred Writings. These contain many works such as: The book of Jubilees, Life of Adam and Eve, and the Secret Gospel of Mark

"I come in Peace. I didn't bring Artillery. But I'm pleading with you with tears in my eyes, if you fuck with me, I'll kill you all." - Gen. Marine Mattis Mad DOG

[Colin Combover in a ComaParticipant 5068]

UnKnownSurviving wrote:

Well, those people were murdered or killed for following Jesus. Or even believing in him, and some of those were Romans. Gentiles. It comes from the Romans who called them “Christ-ians”, as more of an insult than intended name. It wasn’t meant to be a religion, you see. During the time, of Roman empire, Gentiles were learning ancient Judaism, and they were former Romans. Unfortunately, Roman soldiers didn’t like their own people disappearing into the new culture, of which is Israel. So, they brutally separated them. And eventually, during the time of Jesus, and after, Apostle Peter ( and Later, another fellow, Apostle Paul, formerly Saul, of jewish ancestry, also worked with Romans/Gentiles) worked with Gentiles, have had discussions with them, which later resulted in gaining more members of in Christ, and becoming Christians, as the Romans returned to their homeland.

Of course, sadly, the rest of them who returned to their homeland were not welcome back into their own country. We have the Colosseum, which became theater of death for Christians, often killed by Gladiators or mauled by lions of malnutritions. This is the first death. The first death is nothing. The second death is worse. The second death is hell. There’s no returning to God, and that’s end of the line, and there’s no getting out.

There’s lot of it still missing, in historical aspect, though, the bible is very much completed. Just too much information to be written, or the bible could be so overwhelming, that the book could so thick to read everything. so, it make sense to break it up.

Most professed Christians don’t believe in the Old Testament(or only parts they agree with), saying, as Gentiles, we are not bound by the old laws. Whilst Jesus said that he came not to the change the law but to fulfil it, whereas Saul states we are no longer under the law.
Regarding the ten commandments. Can’t remember the name, but there were men in the Torah that were married to 30wives and had concubines. Now unless the translation from Hebrew/Aramaic was skewed, concubine means mistress/or one you are not to in marriage to. In other words, adultery. It didn’t say God punished him in the fires of hell. Hell is really only mentioned in the New Testament, very convenient for the Roman propaganda.
Also reading the 7books that “us” protestants omitted from the kings James Version(1611), in one chapter, it mentions a man who died on his own sword(suicide) rather than be captured by the enemy. Can’t recall the exact words, but words to this effect: “He died a noble death” Again, nowhere did it state he is in hell for murder(of the self), which according to Catholics(the only supposedly true church) suicide is a mortal sin. The list of contradictions between the old and new is tremendous. No wonder there is 30,000 denominations of Christians….

[Author]

Posts