Lesbian women

[Clark GableParticipant 20]

Hello Mgtows,

I want to send an encouraging word to all my brothers on here that are still interested in having sex, yet have no desire to have a “relationship” with a woman. If you are a MGTOW who has evolved past sex seeking, then this post is not for you. I would first like to start with a story. Several years back I went into Hooters feeling unusually confident/c~~~y that day. The waitresses were having a pow-wow in the back of the restaurant and as I walked inside, the meeting ended and all of them began journeying toward their posts. Anyway, I walked up to the hottest one in the restaurant and I said, “I’d like for you to be my server.” This chick was gorgeous, brunette, fake t~~~, 5’4″, 115–all the ingredients for one hell of a lot of fun. I left with her that night when she got off and boy what a blow job I received.

Anyways, we had a brief sexual relationship filled with mind games. The relationship ultimately ended, I’m sure, because I was facing some pretty damn stiff competition among my fellow men. However, in the interim, while we were dating she told me that she had an EIGHT YEAR long relationship with one ugly, fat, nasty, dyke of a bitch! She was not well off financially either. I repeat, she WAS NOT well of financially. She did, however, say the dyke kept her self-esteem in check, was unequivocally in charge, and just straight mean (not in those exact words). This got me thinking. At that point in my life I was in the peak of my bodybuilding pursuit. I’m also a pretty good looking guy in general. How could this extremely beautiful woman have had such a long term relationship with an ugly, fat, nasty, dyke of a bitch? Eureka, I think I have found it. There are certain intangibles that can even trump looks in the MIND (not eyes) of women. However, you rarely see an ugly, fat, nasty, worm dating a gorgeous woman. Yet, I have seen SEVERAL pretty ladies who were dating ugly, fat, nasty, dykes of a bitch. And remember fellas, they don’t even have a penis! For all the MGTOWs out there who are still interested in sex “arrangements” with women, I believe we could learn something from these nasty dykes. What? I don’t know? But I think placing looks in proper perspective in a woman’s eyes is a starter. What do you men think?

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

Welcome.

What was the point of this?

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[Clark GableParticipant 20]

The point was that I do not believe that looks really matter to hot women. I believe it is the intangibles that they seek. I don’t know what the intangibles are? Furthermore, I am currently into powerlifting. In powerlifting, the bigger, the better. I am 5’10” 275 right now. It is an encouraging word to MGTOWs that might not be picturesque. I don’t think that disqualifies them from sex with hot women. Furthermore, I want your thoughts on how ugly dykes get hot women vs. how look impaired men ALMOST never do? I think there is some kind of barrier that we men can transcend, but I don’t know what it is?

[Anonymous 7]

A women will only date someone if they benefit from it in society or if he/she is extremely attractive.

I could care less of what lesbians know to attract hot women or anything else in their minds for that matter and I have never noticed this in life. Not saying your observation is invalid perhaps you are just more observant.

Clark Gable wrote:

But I think placing looks in proper perspective in a woman’s eyes is a starter.

As long as you aren’t a c~~~. Welcome!

[Anonymous 7]

Clark Gable wrote:

I think there is some kind of barrier that we men can transcend, but I don’t know what it is?

This is PUA type of stuff my man.

[BudtaoParticipant 293]

Anonymous wrote:

This is PUA type of stuff my man.

I have to agree on this one. I for one couldn’t care less about attracting women. I would rather not, but unfortunately since I have started my self improvement, I have a hard time not being noticed. Its just too bad that I can’t afford to let myself go anymore. 😛
I am just not sure this is the most productive place to be bringing these kinds of strategies up.

Nirvanna is never having to worry about a woman ever again.

[ILiveAgainParticipant]

It is also well know that:

Gay men have most sex. Then straight couples … then straight married … then lesbians … and finally … lesbian married/couples have the least.

They also have the highest DV rate.

In other words …. they’re fkd in the head.

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

I never tried that PUA stuff because I don’t care. You are welcome to it.

Women are not worth the ROI, pain, or suffering but you’ll welcome to try.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[Clark GableParticipant 20]

It is exactly PUA stuff. Currently, I am a MGTOW/PUA hybrid. I UNDERSTAND a lot of MGTOW are not interested in pursuing sex anymore. I applaud them for this (the they have evolved past any female constraints). I ultimately do not want to pursue sex either. However, I am not in that stage of the evolution process yet. I’m just a very observant guy trying to get the most out of women–just like they are TRYING (good luck) to get the most out of me. I’ve taken the red pill and I see their nature for what it is.

[Clark GableParticipant 20]

Hey Budtao! With all due respect, I stated in my initial post that this post was not intended for those not interested in pursuing sex with women. I am a Man going my own way. I determine where that path leads. If men can’t propose questions amongst their fellow men, then who can they pose them to (certainly not women)? I’m not saying you meant the last sentence to come across like that, but it seemed like a shaming tactic to me.

[Zuberi TauParticipant 10606]

Jan Sobieski wrote:

I never tried that PUA stuff because I don’t care. You are welcome to it.

PUAs are not much different from the thirsty “”bitch made” simps who clog up youtube with lame ass dating advice.

Barbarosa said it best in regards to PUAs who chase trollops.

“They didn’t f~~~ you. They f~~~ed the facade that you fed them.”

[Anonymous 2]

I would have to say from experience, it’s the perversion of what they are doing that gets them off. So the nastier that snatch is and the more she forces her to eat it dominating her turns her on. You can’t make same rules apply for a man because it’s not supposed to be a perversion. If anything it’s the norm that can get boring for her.

I agree sounds a bit pick up artist-ish, but f~~~ it, your not gonna get on one knee are ya? You just wanna find an easy doorway in there by understanding their brain?

That’s where you’re going wrong! Just get a local whore and see if you can work a discount deal for a regular thing. Half price + reduced price for getting her each new regular customer. Also reduced further if your friend and you do a quicky in/on her. I bet you could get a £50 whore down to as little as £10. Before you know it free.

Don’t forget to beat her.

[hellraiderParticipant 2837]

Well, undertanding women just to get in the golden vagina just seems a pua strategy and a waste of time.

Dont forget that at any moment a woman can make a fake rape charge and ruin your life.

I think prostitution is safer and a lot cheaper.

And im waiting for the sex bots so i wont need prostitutes at all

[HitmanParticipant]

See them turn nailed it. .it’s the perversion factor..as a man you can do it. .skills. .but it ain’t worth it to the mgtow. .get the c~~~ lust. satisfied and once you have your full they become meaningless. .no desperation = more pussy. .When you don’t care about them they want you more! Women are submissive by nature. .them he bull dyke.knows it..

[Author]

Posts