Late life divorced women upset they lost the house.

[Won'tGetFooledAgainParticipant 3293]

Just goes to prove we are just walking wallets to these bitches. So these women are stay at home mums with grown up children who never went to work. They get bored of their husbands and want some excitement so divorce them. They then get all upset they they didn’t get to keep the dream house that they didn’t put a penny towards.

“Divorce rate among over-50s has risen by three-quarters over last 20 years
Rise is fuelled by infidelity and women fed up with a lack of excitement
But few wives anticipate their divorce will cost them their home comforts”

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3581787/Why-painful-late-life-divorce-isn-t-losing-husband-s-losing-home.html

For women, everything eventually boils down to Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks.

[Dr. SableParticipant 1064]

Big f~~~ing deal. Majority of them get away with a s~~~ load more than they deserve.

About the article: So poorly written its hard to follow the context. Only a woman/child writes like that.

Zero Tolerance

[Deadly RaverParticipant]

A picture may be worth a thousand words, but I only need two. Neslon, take it away.

Learn from the past, Control the present, and you will know the Future.

[Anonymous 42]

Women running around with their hair on fire from age 5 to 95! Yep, sounds like feminism to me!

[WallyParticipant]

Ok so the women divorce their husbands because they are ” old before their time.” Yeah because they worked their asses off! I have no sympathy and I admit I could read no more after that statement, but interesting no mention of impact on the men. What a load of crap!

"what a waste of a life, to marry, give up your freedom, just for the hope of not dying alone. Don't get married Son."

[Prefer Peace to PieceParticipant 10809]

“Silver Divorces”.

So the lazy, pampered housewife who lives like a queen divorces her husband of 20 years because she is bored and needs a younger more virile male to fulfill her every sexual desire.

And she expects to maintain an opulent lifestyle because her husband owes it to her and God knows she deserves it.

I have a hard time understanding how women can be so bat s~~~ crazy. I suspect the entitled snowflake will try to squeeze every last nickel out of her husband.

She is probably p~~~ed that not every 20 year old male is knocking on her door begging for the honor of her 75 year old charms. These chicks are deluded.

[AttonParticipant]

I not sure what the point of this article was, am I meant to feel sorry for these parasites?

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[OldBillParticipant]

Atton wrote:

I not sure what the point of this article was…

The point of the article is to drive ad revenues.

It’s click bait and the Daily Mail is a past master of the genre.

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[ShinyParticipant 2307]

I gave this as much attention as I could, but gave up before the end. One woman was a second wife who latched onto the guy just as he retired: they were only married 4 years and she expects everything. Another says, “they divorced in 2003, but it was another decade before the financial aftershock of the split hit her” which presumably means she lived quite well on the settlement for 10 years til it ran out, she’d done nothing to prepare for that moment and now is complaining.

Cry me a waterboarding.

[RhinoParticipant 3477]

Karma bitch slapping them through the wall as they cry on the other side at the realization there is nothing but rubble around them.

[Oz-BlokeParticipant 3233]

Heather’s tale in the story is comical. She thought ‘luck-be-a-lady’ on the first marriage and kept the house, but wasn’t so lucky the second-time-round –

“The irony is she had managed to cling on to the house following her split from her first husband in 1987. ‘I’d lived there for five years with my first husband and kept it when we divorced,’ says Heather.”

This article is gold and really made my day! The constant theme in all the case studies is the women all thought they would get to live in their “dream home”, with or without their husbands. Despite the safety-net of the UK system which gives them affordable council houses to rent, they still whinge, moan and bitch. Once a whinging wife, always a whinging ex-wife, never stopping to think about the truly homeless and unfortunate –

Be thankful you live in a country that has a social welfare safety-net before you bitch and moan that you had to ‘share’ the marital assets

#ManOut

[HitmanParticipant]

f~~~ing selfish c~~~s want it ALL.
it don’t work that way.
and the tears start to flow.
cry your eyes out T~~~S..
shallow bitches deserve NOTHING !

[Jim01Participant 6678]

Shiny wrote:

I gave this as much attention as I could, but gave up before the end. One woman was a second wife who latched onto the guy just as he retired: they were only married 4 years and she expects everything. Another says, “they divorced in 2003, but it was another decade before the financial aftershock of the split hit her” which presumably means she lived quite well on the settlement for 10 years til it ran out, she’d done nothing to prepare for that moment and now is complaining.

Cry me a waterboarding.

I spotted that too. Disgusting and thick at the same time

[TaxGuyParticipant]

I don’t know how many times I told my ex that signing divorce papers doesn’t make more money magically appear. I have to have enough money to put a roof over my head. We used to have one house payment, now we have two. Signing the papers does magically make more expenses appear, so if there’s no extra money, but there is extra expenses, expect your standard of living to drop.

For some reason that logic doesn’t compute to most women. Then again, most logic doesn’t compute to most women. Or a judge. How the justice system has the concept of her standard of living staying the same is the most irrational concept I’ve ever heard.

It’s like the movie War Games. The only way to win is if you don’t play.

Order the good wine

[BeerParticipant 11832]

A guy I work with got wrecked by child support payments and alimony. Part of the reason he agreed to the ridiculously s~~~ty deal he got in divorce was because he loves his kids and wanted them to stay in the house they grew up in so they could stay in the same town and finish up at the same schools they had always gone too. He’ll be done with his obligations in 2 years as the youngest will be 18 and done with school. His ex is already in panic mode because she knows there is no way in hell she can afford the house once he doesn’t have to pay her anymore. Its hilarious listening to his stories…she thinks he’ll just keep paying her alimony because he doesn’t want her to lose the house so the kids can have a place to stay if any decide to commute to college or just for a place on vacations or summers if they need it, and he’s just like f~~~ that c~~~, I think I’m going to buy my old house back soon because I’ll be able to afford it.

[Won'tGetFooledAgainParticipant 3293]

TaxGuy wrote:

I don’t know how many times I told my ex that signing divorce papers doesn’t make more money magically appear. I have to have enough money to put a roof over my head. We used to have one house payment, now we have two. Signing the papers does magically make more expenses appear, so if there’s no extra money, but there is extra expenses, expect your standard of living to drop.

For some reason that logic doesn’t compute to most women. Then again, most logic doesn’t compute to most women. Or a judge. How the justice system has the concept of her standard of living staying the same is the most irrational concept I’ve ever heard.

It’s like the movie War Games. The only way to win is if you don’t play.

Most women don’t have to worry about paying for the roof over their head, so they have no idea about real life. My ex wife was the same, she just used her card to pay for things and there was always money in the account so why would anything change once divorced?

Most women think divorce means they will have exactly the same lifestyle they currently have, just they can get rid of their husband and replace him with the new, temporarily exciting guy.

They don’t seem to understand that the ex husband has to be housed too, so the money that went to pay for one household is now being split between two households. It is almost like they expect to keep the house and all the money without giving a second thought as to where the ex husband is supposed to live. They honestly think he is magically going to live for free while still giving them all his money.

For women, everything eventually boils down to Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks.

[RoyDalParticipant]

Let us all close our eyes and rush out and get married today!

What could go wrong?

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[Author]

Posts