Kuddos to all you straight MGTOWs

Topic by MGTOWhomo

MGTOWhomo

Home Forums Introductions Kuddos to all you straight MGTOWs

This topic contains 59 replies, has 14 voices, and was last updated by  Anonymous 4 years, 10 months ago.

Viewing 20 posts - 41 through 60 (of 60 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #26343
    Ned Trent
    Ned Trent
    Participant
    4894

    Heey, was more like a little side note, aah well…

    I'd rather die a natual death with a clear MGTOW conscience somewhere off the grid than one within "modern" civilisation with a big stress mark on my forehead and a couple of dozen tubes plugged into my body. Back to the plantation..? Me..? Hey, literally: I won't ever fucking kid myself...YZERLMNTSIC

    #26344
    +1
    Keymaster
    Keymaster
    Keymaster

    Ok then. Always enjoy the suggestions. By the way, IU have noticed the forums don’t take as long to post and there has been a speed increase. this has been our focus for the last couple of days. So Im glad that’s improved.

    If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.
    #26345
    +1

    Anonymous
    11

    Don’t forget Vagenda courtesy of MGTOWhomo bringing it to our attention. They’ll like it if they get that far.

    #26353
    Keymaster
    Keymaster
    Keymaster

    Interesting. I never thought there would be a need or desire for homosexual to go his own way in a smilier sense.

    & yes the forums are much snappier than last week. How you would fix that sort of thing is beyond me.

    If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.
    #26603
    MGTOWhomo
    MGTOWhomo
    Participant
    111

    @ Mycocaine: yup, absolutely there is. I don’t even identify myself as “gay” because the “gay” community is so infected with “effeminatism” – for want of a better word – or its counterpart, the overly masculine macho-type, that it becomes impossible to find a normal guy just to hang with and TALK, much less do anything ELSE, without the intrusion of wimmin or, depending on circumstances, the effeminatized “gay” man, or oftentimes, both. For example, the “gay” community is suffused with labels relating to sexual roles. These did not appear so much before the “feminist” revolution (and HIV of course). Now this is nothing compared to what I’ve read here on this site, about dads having their kids and lives ruined by these harridans and the insjustice system in Canada and the USA. We have it alot easier than you guys, but still, it’s there.

    #26652
    J.D Silvernail
    J.D Silvernail
    Participant
    383

    Wow I didn’t know women treated gay guys like s~~~ . No offence

    I'm married to the game,but she broke her vows.

    #26661
    MGTOWhomo
    MGTOWhomo
    Participant
    111

    None taken. That said, the treatment we get is really kind of minor compared to what they dish out to you straight guys. With us, it’s more of a passive aggression thing I think.

    #26663
    Warratah
    Warratah
    Participant
    895

    Hello Homo – welcome. A question for you – where do you stand on homosexual marriage? The reason I ask is this – I’m in Ireland and we are coming up to a referendum on the legalization of same-sex marriages. Our media is hugely in favour of a Yes vote. Past experience has taught me that when the Media is in favour of a specific social change its normally because they are being encouraged by people who see an opportunity to make money. And of course I’m not talking about the money being made by wedding planners – the majority of us on this site realise that in the case of marriage, the real money is to be made in the divorce courts by the judicial system.

    I have spoken to local gay/lesbian couples and the issues they raise wrt legalization all seems to involve death – ie the Estate, succession, funeral plans, burial wishes etc and how at present an estranged next-of-kin can completely override a long-term same-sex partner. I understand their argument. However, when I try to raise the question of divorce – nobody seems to have given it much thought. And when I explain to them what the likely financial outcome for a divorced man looks like, they seem to believe that it wouldn’t impact them in the same way.

    Call me cynical, but I firmly believe that lawyers, solicitors and the whole legal system are just itching to get their hands on another cash-stream …

    Your thoughts?

    ...And in our own despair, against our will, Comes wisdom to us by the awful grace of God. - Agamemnon; by Aeschylus

    #26665

    Anonymous
    42

    Hey Homo, You sound like you’re just a regular normal guy, not the play acting s~~~ I’ve seen in some queers, I mean they play for a show of attention, ” look at me “, where as you seem to be more down to earth, One of my cousins was a queer (meaning different, or actor) he died of AIDS, everyone couldn’t stand him, LOUD, Opinionated, just an asshole always ACTING queer. I couldn’t relate to him on any level, ever! In Springfield, I knew quite a number of gays that weren’t actors. You would never know if met them. Correct me if I’m wrong…..

    You’re a MGHOW first, gay second, you don’t give a f~~~ what people think, you’ve seen all the same s~~~ I have, “plastic people” totally synthetic and void of humanity, and humility? F~~~ing rats eating each other!

    #26668
    +1
    MGTOWhomo
    MGTOWhomo
    Participant
    111

    @WarHar: Actually, I’m sort of against it. If provision could be made via other legal routes, contracts and so on, I would be even more strongly against it. My other misgiving is that it’s a trap, just like it is for straights. I have a friend who got “married” in one of those states that recognize it, and now he’s stuck with a guy he cannot stand (trust me here, the “drama queen” is every bit as bad as a woman), and doesn’t have the money to get out of it. So, yea, I’m against it. Frankly, homosexuals got along fine without it all these years, so why now? Like you, I’m suspicious of anything the press and politicians are promoting. If they’re promoting it, they have a hidden agenda as far as I’m concerned, and it isn’t good.

    Another reason I’m against it is more philosophical I guess. Gays are a minority, and yet, they want to impose a sweeping social change on society in the name of being accepted. As far as I can tell, being “accepted” means shoving their idiotic flamboyance into people’s faces  – much like wimmin and feminists do – and demanding it be accepted. Nope. Not for me. And that imposition and social engineering would be, I suspect, the first step toward much more egregious things. In other words, it’s a camel’s nose in the tent. But there’s a bigger vagenda behind the nose, and they’re not letting us see it yet. I suspect one of them is the drastic lowering of the legal age for consensual sex, and I’m totally opposed to that. There’s enough sickos out there already robbing kids of their innoence at a way too young age. There’s actually a sick and twisted organization out there called NAMBLA or some such thing, actually advocating for pedophilia and legalizing a dramatic lowering of the consentual sex age, so that these sickos can go diddle little boys and rob them of their childhood and innocence.  That’s why I totally detatch myself from the “gay ‘community’,” because it is wholly effeminatized now, and into some pretty sick and disgusting stuff.  I’m an old school homosexual. I like MEN. Period. Not boys, not women, not sexed changed weirdos, not drag queens – and you’ll note, all of those groups have one thing in common: they’re effeminatized.

    #26669
    MGTOWhomo
    MGTOWhomo
    Participant
    111

    @ MG-Tower. I suppose I am. I’m not all in people’s faces about being “gay.” In fact, I don’t like the word and dissociate myself from that whole community, because by and large, they’re as collectivized and as much of a hive as wimmin are. And about as in touch with their humanity, and about as deep as wimmin are. Which is to say, they’re as deep as puddles.

    #26680

    Anonymous
    42

    they’re as deep as puddles.

    This is my attitude in life: Judge NOT, Wisdom will judge for me. Hate not, hatred will surly find me, like a mirror, I reflect attitude with attitude, backing down is the allowance of tyranny. You’re right about government ulterior motives, move everyone into an inescapable cesspool of ultra liberalism, A furious hell fire established on earth, It’s the destruction of independent critical thinking, mostly ushered in by liberal feminists, and child molesters should be bagged and incinerated like the trash they are.

    I have indulged in under aged sex, but I was only 5 to 8 years older at that time, and was attacked by sex starved maniacs, just minding my own business. I’m a pussyholic I couldn’t help my self. I was lonely and weak at that time. I was never a diddler; these girls were by all accounts grown women. I was stupid! Just a dick pole on the merry-go-round!

    #26706
    John Doe
    John Doe
    Participant
    743

    And that imposition and social engineering would be, I suspect, the first step toward much more egregious things. In other words, it’s a camel’s nose in the tent. But there’s a bigger vagenda behind the nose, and they’re not letting us see it yet. I suspect one of them is the drastic lowering of the legal age for consensual sex, and I’m totally opposed to that. There’s enough sickos out there already robbing kids of their innoence at a way too young age.

    If memory serves me correctly the APA is changing pedophilia, in all its forms, to an orientation.   I remember reading something about this back in 2012.  I would have to agree with your point here.  However, I think there is still something deeper at play, politically speaking.

    #26849
    MGTOWhomo
    MGTOWhomo
    Participant
    111

    @ John Doe: Yes I agree… the APA is serving very deep political interests.

    #28555
    MGTOWhomo
    MGTOWhomo
    Participant
    111

    @ John Doe: I agree, there is something deeper politically. As to what it is, I don’t know. I spent a few minutes this evening reading through some other forums, and some articles, and it’s clear – at least to me – that mysandry is being deliberately driven by the corporations and the government. The question is: why? One obvious answer: make people at large even more sheep than they are already. It’s the promotion of that “hive mind,” the collectivization and the shaming tactics that seems to go hand in hand with feminism, which comes, always, complete with its own “analytical overlay” (if I can borrow the term) to everything. There’s even a book out now – though I haven’t read it, it looks to be very good – called Sanctifying Mysandry.

    #28603
    RoyDal
    RoyDal
    Participant

    One obvious answer: make people at large even more sheep than they are already…

    Yep. The sheep-people buy and vote in ways that are easily predicted and controlled. People who think for themselves, not so much.

    Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

    #28659
    MGTOWhomo
    MGTOWhomo
    Participant
    111

    @roydal: Yup. Which is why they’re trying to feminize everything. Men think as individuals, more critically, analytically, if they’re left alone to do so.

    #28663
    Tim Patten
    Tim Patten
    Participant
    659

    Hello MGTOWhomo, I’m flattered that you might read my book. I hope you enjoy some of the couples I describe. And thank you for being forthright with your orientation.

    #28666
    MGTOWhomo
    MGTOWhomo
    Participant
    111

    @ Tim Patten: Thanks Tim… I look forward to it… will be a few weeks as I’m in the middle of a lot of stuff, but will do it. I love reading so it’s on my list!

     

    #28668

    Anonymous
    42

    Hey Tim, I met you on you-tube, I like your avatar, wondered what you were thinking? Now I get to find out. What were you thinking when that photo was snapped?

    And WELCOME! I liked you when I first saw your photo, You’re in frisco if I remember correctly, yes?

Viewing 20 posts - 41 through 60 (of 60 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.