Koreas expected to announce end of 68 year war

Topic by 743 roadmaster

743 roadmaster

Home Forums Political Corner Koreas expected to announce end of 68 year war

This topic contains 16 replies, has 12 voices, and was last updated by Y_  Y_ 1 year, 9 months ago.

Viewing 17 posts - 1 through 17 (of 17 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #785555
    +6
    743 roadmaster
    743 roadmaster
    Participant

    https://nypost.com/2018/04/17/koreas-expected-to-announce-end-of-68-year-war/

    trump

    North and South Korea are discussing plans to make a stunning announcement at their leaders summit next week: a permanent end to the 68-year state of war between the two, according to reports.

    ——Thanks to Donald Trump

    mgtow is its own worst enemy- https://www.campusreform.org/

    #785556
    +8
    PistolPete
    PistolPete
    Participant
    27143

    About f~~~ing time—here is a little known fact. MANY MANY South Koreans DO NOT want a reunification with the North. They saw what happened to the economy of west Germany when it reunited with east Germany and the Koreans do not want to suffer the same fate. Can you blame them?

    #785580
    +4
    Y_
    Y_
    Participant
    4591

    About f~~~ing time—here is a little known fact. MANY MANY South Koreans DO NOT want a reunification with the North. They saw what happened to the economy of west Germany when it reunited with east Germany and the Koreans do not want to suffer the same fate. Can you blame them?

    This is a move to a peace treaty and the push to lifting of UN economic sanctions. Nothing more. The UN sanctions can be lifted without US support if certain conditions are met by NK. Note the Xi – Kim talks last month. They have a plan for this all worked out.

    China and Russia will not allow any talk of reunification – neither will the NK regime. This will mean a US controlled peninsula next to the Chinese mainland. The US will start a false flag war for sure to take on China if this happens. So that option is out.

    It has been critically assessed in military blogs that NK does not need nukes. They are therefore giving up nothing. The US will not attack either way. So this way it looks good all round.

    So what is the objective?

    It’s all about getting SK and Japan into China’s OBOR. Remember the Russian dialogue with NK, SK and Japan? They already have something ready to boost trade if a NK-SK peace treaty is established.

    SK is now going under tariffs and there will be further economic blood spilt by Trump. Japan desperately needs this to get out of the economic hell of the last 30 years – again Trump is not helping.

    Trump got blindsided and he did not even know it.
    That is why he wants to re-join and ‘lead’ the TPP.
    Dream on Trump.

    #785618
    +3

    Anonymous
    14

    I don’t see re-unification happening. Their two systems are incompatible at present. I do not believe China will allow it to happen as well as the U.S.

    A formal cessation of the Korean War may be possible, but it absolutely does not mean a Korean War mark II will not happen and it won’t take much of a spark to start that fire.

    #785854
    +2
    GregB0
    GregB0
    Participant

    MANY MANY South Koreans DO NOT want a reunification with the North.

    North Koreans living in South Korea want their families to be allow to move south, but the nation as a whole will collapse if they were unified. Once that happened, China would have another province to manage.

    ​"​My father didn't tell me how to live; he lived, and let me watch him do it.​" - Clarence Buddinton Kelland

    #785865
    Carnage
    Carnage
    Participant
    22113

    Boring, I hope it all goes terribly wrong and the Asians start a blood bath, ohhh boy those guys are good at that.

    WAR WAR WAR NUKES NUKES NUKES.

    To those following me, be careful, I just farted. Men those beans are killers.

    #785871
    +6
    PistolPete
    PistolPete
    Participant
    27143

    China and Russia will not allow any talk of reunification – neither will the NK regime. This will mean a US controlled peninsula next to the Chinese mainland. The US will start a false flag war for sure to take on China if this happens. So that option is out.

    This why the US should pull out of SK. We have no business being there and nothing but trouble will result from our presence. The SK’s can manage their own affairs.

    #785887
    It'sallbs
    It’sallbs
    Participant

    Boring, I hope it all goes terribly wrong and the Asians start a blood bath, ohhh boy those guys are good at that.

    WAR WAR WAR NUKES NUKES NUKES.

    http://www.leavemeansleave.eu

    #785976
    +2
    SpaceManFin
    SpaceManFin
    Participant
    48

    I’ll believe it when it actually happens. NK has a long history of giving big promises and going back on all of them. Kim would be a f~~~ing idiot to surrender his nukes. They are the only item in his possession that GUARANTEES survival of the state and its sovereignty.

    #786031

    Anonymous
    12

    By all intents and purposes the war has been over for 68 years. This is just a signature.

    They won’t reunite and I think it would be a mess anyway, all those peasants from the North entering the Americanized South?

    #786039
    +1
    Uchibenkei
    uchibenkei
    Participant
    7965

    it’s only symbolic. they’re not at war now really, at least in a conventional sense. so what would really change? dprk can’t allow people to leave because they won’t come back. maybe increase economic ties. i agree with poster above who said it’s a strategy to remove sanctions.

    I bathe in the tears of single moms.

    #786156
    +1
    Y_
    Y_
    Participant
    4591

    I’ll believe it when it actually happens. NK has a long history of giving big promises and going back on all of them. Kim would be a f~~~ing idiot to surrender his nukes. They are the only item in his possession that GUARANTEES survival of the state and its sovereignty.

    On the contrary – Korea never did anything to the US. The US started the Korean War to get a foothold on the peninsula and start a proxy war with China, which (at that time) they claimed implicit ownership.

    it is the US that has never kept any of their promises to end the war. The NK came to the peace table with Carter, Clinton Bush Sr, Bush Jr – all to no avail. Washington does not want peace in Asia. Peace is bad for its war economy and it needs to take down China – it has long known China is the greatest threat to its hegemony. China will take down the US dollar. It would have happened eventually anyway but China is the face of the bogeyman Washington cannot do anything about.

    #786225
    IGMOW (I Go My Own Way)
    IGMOW (I Go My Own Way)
    Participant
    2572

    No way does South Korea ever end up under the reign of Un or his family. North Korea’s leadership won’t allow anyone else to control things. They will likely remain separate, but put an end the ceasefire situation going on now. North Korea does get sanctions lifted. It is all a game played. North and South Korea don’t know what to expect out of Trump, so Trump being a wildcard likely works here.

    If relationship normalizes more, North Korea is going to have a harder time trying to maintain paranoia to keep people in line.

    "I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.

    #786279
    +3
    SpaceManFin
    SpaceManFin
    Participant
    48

    I’ll believe it when it actually happens. NK has a long history of giving big promises and going back on all of them. Kim would be a f~~~ing idiot to surrender his nukes. They are the only item in his possession that GUARANTEES survival of the state and its sovereignty.

    On the contrary – Korea never did anything to the US. The US started the Korean War to get a foothold on the peninsula and start a proxy war with China, which (at that time) they claimed implicit ownership.

    it is the US that has never kept any of their promises to end the war. The NK came to the peace table with Carter, Clinton Bush Sr, Bush Jr – all to no avail. Washington does not want peace in Asia. Peace is bad for its war economy and it needs to take down China – it has long known China is the greatest threat to its hegemony. China will take down the US dollar. It would have happened eventually anyway but China is the face of the bogeyman Washington cannot do anything about.

    The Korean War started when NK decided to invade the south, with explicit help from the Soviets and promises from China.

    We’ll see soon enough how well this holds up.

    #786307
    Atton
    Atton
    Participant

    I think a sneaking suspicion that none of this will stick but I sure as f~~~ hope it does.

    A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

    #786560
    Y_
    Y_
    Participant
    4591

    The Korean War started when NK decided to invade the south, with explicit help from the Soviets and promises from China.

    This is the official US narrative. I would request you to do a little research on the internet – there are many non-MSM sites that carry the truth of what happened and why the US is still at war with countries in Asia and the rest of the world.

    AS a starting point I will give you a link to an article on how the Korean War of 1950 actually started. Need I say that it was an American False Flag event?

    http://www.unz.com/jpetras/provocations-as-pretexts-for-imperial-war-from-pearl-harbor-to-911/?highlight=korea

    I will also point to my post on this site almost a year ago on the events since that war.

    /forums/topic/the-case-for-north-korea-a-rebuttal-against-the-us-deep-state/

    #786847
    SpaceManFin
    SpaceManFin
    Participant
    48

    The Korean War started when NK decided to invade the south, with explicit help from the Soviets and promises from China.

    This is the official US narrative. I would request you to do a little research on the internet – there are many non-MSM sites that carry the truth of what happened and why the US is still at war with countries in Asia and the rest of the world.

    AS a starting point I will give you a link to an article on how the Korean War of 1950 actually started. Need I say that it was an American False Flag event?

    http://www.unz.com/jpetras/provocations-as-pretexts-for-imperial-war-from-pearl-harbor-to-911/?highlight=korea

    I will also point to my post on this site almost a year ago on the events since that war.

    /forums/topic/the-case-for-north-korea-a-rebuttal-against-the-us-deep-state/

    Before we start rolling up our sleeves for a good and enjoyable fight, we need to establish common terms. In the history as it’s written, the war began with an invasion by the North. The lead-up to this invasion (civil war, unrest & so forth) is a secondary topic. Who started the war? As in which side was the first to utilize military force in an aggressive manner for the purpose of large-scale conquest? The answer to that lies in recorded history. If you want to dispute that, provide hard evidence.

    We can talk about false flag attacks (which happen and have been utilized through the ages. I’m Finnish and the Soviets did a good job with that during the Winter War.), but false-flag attacks of the time (nor ever) were capable of mobilizing Corps and Divisions. Crossing the 38th parallel with large-scale formations from the North is not a false flag attack, its good ole’ invasion.

    One source (that does not directly contradict the basic facts established through multiple other sources) is not sufficient proof to counter all other evidence. Wars are the prime breeding ground for atrocities. All sides commit them and the North Koreans got seriously f~~~ed by indiscriminate killing of civilians during the war, which is appalling. Crimes committed during the war have little bearing on who actually threw the first punch though.

    I also recommend you do your research and read up Occam’s Razor in particular.

Viewing 17 posts - 1 through 17 (of 17 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.