Kind, Loving and Loyal.

[MATRIXParticipant 2342]

Women are non of these.

In fact MOST are the complete opposite.

Mean, Hateful and most certainly DISLOYAL.

They don’t possess the qualities you want and need for a relationship.

It’s a LIE that they ever did.

As if that wasn’t bad enough,

They’re legally entitled and encouraged to destroy you, in every way, from stealing all your resources to putting you in JAIL.

They will do this with a smirk and egged on by the HIVE while they latch on to yet another victim.

Rinse and repeat.

End their game, permanently.

#MANOUT.

There is NO wisdom in signing a contract with someone who benefits from breaking it.

[Anonymous 3]

Kind, Loving and Loyal.

… dog? That is what comes to mind.

A woman is kind when she is interested. She is loving when she is trapping, and she is loyal… for some time.

Loyalty is measured in face of options and lack of repercussions. And what happens today says women are not loyal.
Sure, lots of men are not loyal in marriage to, but with the lack of sex, love, kindness or respect, what do you expect?

[MonkParticipant 16988]

Loyalty means something different to men and wimmin.

For wimmin, it’s Briffaults Law. ‘Loyalty’ simply means to stick around as long as it’s sufficiently profitable.

[MATRIXParticipant 2342]

They’re ‘loyal’ only to their need of you.

BUT

Even when they still need you or want to be with you, they’re STILL DISLOYAL.

Think about that.

Even when they’re loyal, they’re disloyal, because as Monk says, loyal to them means they’re just sticking around.

They’re still cheating or trash talking you to the hive.

THERE IS NO LOYALTY.

Kick their disloyal bi.tch asses to the curb.

There is NO wisdom in signing a contract with someone who benefits from breaking it.

[EGParticipant 1852]

MATRIX wrote:

They’re ‘loyal’ only to their need of you.

BUT

Even when they still need you or want to be with you, they’re STILL DISLOYAL.

I’ve been thinking about this word “need” lately. Specifically I’ve been looking at how often it’s used in place of the word “want”, as in, “I need you to bla bla bla”. Whenever you hear this sentence, it’s super-important to step back and consider whether what she’s demanding is a need or a want.

[MATRIXParticipant 2342]

EG,

ABSOLUTELY.

They too often say ‘I need you’

Like it’s some deep romantic thing or love.

They’re not saying ‘I want you’ or I love you’

When they say ‘I Need you’ take it at face value, they need your wallet and your status or utility.

KICK their needy b.itch asses to the curb.

There is NO wisdom in signing a contract with someone who benefits from breaking it.

[AwakenedParticipant 35201]

MATRIX wrote:

EG,
ABSOLUTELY.
They too often say ‘I need you’
Like it’s some deep romantic thing or love.
They’re not saying ‘I want you’ or I love you’
When they say ‘I Need you’ take it at face value, they need your wallet and your status or utility.
KICK their needy b.itch asses to the curb.

Never TRUST what Liars “say”…..AWALT

In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

When I read the title I was thinking that surely your talking about dogs.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[MoreSkyParticipant 4865]

Antonyms from Thesaurus:

Kind antonyms: cruel, disagreeable, discourteous, inattentive, inconsiderate, inhumane, mean, rude, thoughtless, uncaring, uncompassionate, unfeeling, unmindful, unsympathetic, violent, bitter, ungenerous

Loving antonyms: same as kind with the addition of apathetic, greedy, heedless, inconstant, indifferent, neglectful, selfish, unfaithful

Loyal antonyms: disloyal, faithless, undependable, unreliable, untrustworthy

They certainly are the opposite of Kind, Loving and Loyal.

The feminist ideology would have everyone believe that women are emotionally “intelligent”, caring, selfless, and oppressed but, of course in reality they are emotionally stunted, selfish, greedy slags who demand power over everything in the name of equality, with no concept of the reality of life which gives us a great laugh when they hit The Wall and break out the cat-lady starter kit.

They are incapable of bringing anything to a relationship because their narcissism demands their “needs” are fulfilled without consequence or complaint and the legal system provides them with the financial backing to do this and they lie to themselves and everyone to get their “needs” met.

"...reinvent your life because you must; it is your life and its history and the present belong only to you.” It is Your Life, Charles Bukowski.

[WallyParticipant]

Puffin Stuff wrote:

When I read the title I was thinking that surely your talking about dogs.

I was too

Ever hear of a woman saving her husband? I never have, not saying it hasn’t happened but always hear about a man saving his wife or child or a dog saving it’s owner.

"what a waste of a life, to marry, give up your freedom, just for the hope of not dying alone. Don't get married Son."

[EGParticipant 1852]

Wally wrote:

Puffin Stuff wrote:

When I read the title I was thinking that surely your talking about dogs.

I was too

Ever hear of a woman saving her husband? I never have, not saying it hasn’t happened but always hear about a man saving his wife or child or a dog saving it’s owner.

That’s because it doesn’t fit the men-are-disposable narrative.

[CPT ObviousParticipant 2729]

Wally wrote:

Ever hear of a woman saving her husband?

Conversely, ever hear a guy talking about his wife after being married for a while?

Sure you have and it’s always about how she nags and complains all the time.

"You don't know a woman till you have met her in divorce court."

[CPT ObviousParticipant 2729]

Puffin Stuff wrote:

When I read the title I was thinking that surely your talking about dogs.

Reminds me of the joke:

Lock your wife and dog in the trunk of your car. A few hours later guess which one is happy and excited to see you when you open it up?

"You don't know a woman till you have met her in divorce court."

[Sky-OParticipant 18936]

Was with a pumpkin at one point that left HER, 9lb, toy breed dog at my house when she bailed out to get back on the C•carousel when he was a year old.

Him and I forged a sacred bond over the years together and I showed him what kind, loving and loyal was.

[Prefer Peace to PieceParticipant 10809]

Women can certainly fake kind, loving, and loyal.

Women are dangerous creatures. Women can often manipulate blue-pilled guys all day long. There is a reason women
own most of the wealth in the country. Women can be absolutely charming. They can feign kindness and loyalty.
They can make you believe that they are your best friend.

Don’t be fooled.

On average, the typical U.S. marriage that ends in divorce lasts just seven years. Women often start planning
their divorce two years before they pull the trigger.
And while married, women sometimes use the financial stability of the marriage to bone chad.

I know I have been blindsided a few times. Most of my friends have also been blindsided.
Women know how to play most men. Thank God for MGTOW.

[WallyParticipant]

CPT Obvious wrote:

Wally wrote:

Ever hear of a woman saving her husband?

Conversely, ever hear a guy talking about his wife after being married for a while?
Sure you have and it’s always about how she nags and complains all the time.

My cousin would tell me how his fellow engineers would complain all the time about their wives, sadly he is getting married next month. Every man that has gotten married thinks his snowflake is different. He sent me a text one day jokingly saying ” I’m only making this mistake once.” But it gave me pause- how many men go into this knowing they are more than likely going to get f~~~ed over but do it anyway because of vagina?

"what a waste of a life, to marry, give up your freedom, just for the hope of not dying alone. Don't get married Son."

[CPT ObviousParticipant 2729]

Wally wrote:

how many men go into this knowing they are more than likely going to get f.ucked over but do it anyway because of vagina?

Most do exactly that.

“Blinded by steam from their own gonads, they stumble ignorantly into relationships with women and later awakened to find themselves trapped in an ever deepening pit of emotional, legal, and financial quicksand.“

"You don't know a woman till you have met her in divorce court."

[Sky-OParticipant 18936]

Prefer Peace to Piece wrote:

And while married, women sometimes use the financial stability of the marriage to bone chad.

And sometimes they don’t stay with the financial stability.

I was never a Chad, but one pumpkin over idealized me early on, in a purely narcissistic sense. Because she needed to believe she had a Chad. Actually convinced herself in a delusional way that I was a Chad, based strictly on the fact that I was just the least-Beta type guy she had ever been with.

Bottom line was: In reality, she would have never been able to handle a real Chad.

She imagined me as being one though. On some level she got off on it. And like I said – I didn’t fit the mold for a Chad. I was just really far away on the spectrum from being a beta and just barely on the perimeter of being a Chad. But in her delusional world: she considered me a Chad.

Anyway – Back to staying with the financial stability of a beta while getting Chad c•ck on the side.

She bailed out on Beta and professed her undying (but not real in any way) love for me.

In all honesty, the beta wallet was a good deal for her but she didn’t necessarily need his money. She was a trust fund princess and was financially stable in that sense. But while married to Beta, she did not have to spend any of her money, reciprocate or contribute to things in any way. Which essentially is a phenomenal deal in the realm of hybrid hypergamy. Which I definitely as a woman with money that locks onto a beta wallet that pays for everything and she never has to access her money. (BTW: In rare situations like that – It is the ultimate sh•t test for a guy that has money. He winds up financing the entire charade, knowing all along that she could also reciprocate but she doesn’t)

I’ll spare the details of the 14 months we were together and she kept her narcissistic mask on the entire time.

Until that one night when we were arguing and she screamed:

‘You don’t know what I left behind to be able to do this!! You wouldn’t understand!!’

She was indirectly referencing bailing out on a secured and well trained beta wallet so that we could be together.

I understand that and so much more now.

[Author]

Posts