Keymaster please respond

[Spank The MisandristsParticipant 2308]

Alright bro, seems like you just deleted one of my threads where I posted a funny picture “teaching” men how to disable a woman. Now that s~~~ is funny, because it’s so far from the reality we all know and live in.

I agree we are above that, and I doubt anybody in this community is going to do it irl just because they saw that image nor was I trying to tell people to be violent. So what’s the reason behind such strong reaction and action taken by you?

I am not looking for a fight, just want some explanations.

[The Skank SpankerParticipant 1372]

MGTOW has this feature where you can send private messages.

[Spank The MisandristsParticipant 2308]

Just realized that, I will do just that.

The Skank Spanker wrote:

MGTOW has this feature where you can send private messages.

[Spank The MisandristsParticipant 2308]

Seems like that message button has been disabled on keymaster’s profile page.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Perhaps you didn’t read my response to it. I didn’t arbitrarily delete it without explaining and I notified. I don’t want to delete anything – ever – but the thread was called “how to disable a woman” and the image was a sex-reversal that’s nearly identical to this.

http://tinyurl.com/o6pfkww

Women find that endorsement of violence “hilarious”. But MGTOW are above that, and we are illustrating how that’s a PROBLEM in society today. The entire mentality is f~~~ed. So even though you might be fully justified and inspired to retort with something similar, we are not Jezebel. We are men of class, honor and above that.

“How to disable a woman” is not on the menu. It’s not appropriate here. Our VERY short list of forums guidelines is explicit about that, and we actually use that link as an example of what not to do here.

Not saying you were wrong. I’m saying THEY are wrong.
It’s up to us to know the difference between right and wrong, because they never will.

You will NEVER see a commercial of a man punting a c~~~ to sell a product.
But guess what:

THAT’s how you disable a woman. It’s much easier than you think. Just hold a mirror up to her.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Spank The MisandristsParticipant 2308]

Alright bro, it was definitely not my intention to advocate violence. I respect your decision, and my bad for not have read the guidelines. Thanks for your response.

Now can I have my c~~~water please?

[KeymasterKeymaster]

It’s perfectly OK. We all understand. Below this is a reminder (on every page) that we are all representatives of MGTOW with a link reminder…… to just think before we post. “Kicking her back” doesn’t mesh with what we’re doing here.

We received an email the other day (also in the testimonials) “This website is amazing. It’s dripping with class” from a “Jack” who stumbled here, took a look around and couldn’t shut his computer off. The message clear and ringing true.

We all understand that men are FED UP with all this man-hating s~~~ in the media, social attitudes etc, and if we’re not careful and don’t set/elevate new standards, it LOWERS everyone to the female standard.

Not in my lifetime.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Anonymous 42]

Spank The Misandrists wrote:

Now can I have my c~~~water please?

Now that’s CLASS! He said please…

[BlacqueJacqueShellacqueParticipant 6890]

It has been a pleasure to watch the two of you discuss, and amicably solve, this important issue. It is a small example of how “real men” solve problems. Discussion, common sense, facts and understanding. Thumbs up to you both for being “the bigger man”. F~~~in’ A (eh) boyz, f~~~in’ A!

[Ned TrentParticipant 4894]

Yep, this would be like “civilization 2.0” in the making.

Oh and look: without the presence of any woman but all by ourselves.

Who if not us can do it..?

Bless!

I'd rather die a natual death with a clear MGTOW conscience somewhere off the grid than one within "modern" civilisation with a big stress mark on my forehead and a couple of dozen tubes plugged into my body. Back to the plantation..? Me..? Hey, literally: I won't ever fucking kid myself...YZERLMNTSIC

[RennieParticipant]

That’s how a dispute should be solved.

[SpacemonkeyParticipant 1481]

I’m conflicted here. On the one hand it is wrong to condone violence but on the other hand it is the right of human beings to be able to defend themselves.

In the gynocentric world in which we live a man can lose his livelihood, his status and his freedom based upon a sound bite taken completely out of context and we should be careful not to give them any excuse to do so.

BUT in a world where female violence against men is regarded as humour we as human beings have a right to defend ourselves.

What is more important to MGTOW?

A: To avoid antagonizing a section of society which already feels itself to be victimised by us?

B: To stand up for a man’s right to defend himself from female aggression?

I’ll go for B.

“Long is the way and hard, that out of Hell leads up to light.”

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Spacemonkey wrote:

I’m conflicted here. On the one hand it is wrong to condone violence but on the other hand it is the right of human beings to be able to defend themselves.

I think you’ll agree that’s a different thing. A woman once threw a remote control at my head with intent to hit me. She missed but I didn’t throw it back. I took her purse and threw it FAAAAAAAAR into the street. When she ran out screaming after it (and they always do) I bolted the door behind her and didn’t even mail her her shoes.

No violence required.

Spacemonkey wrote:

What is more important to MGTOW? A… or B……

C.

Never putting yourself in a situation where you will have to choose either. There is virtually 0% requirement to “defend yourself from female aggression” if you never give her the opportunity to start that s~~~. Refuse to even make a decision.

A MGHOW can remove it as a variable entirely. One fragment of an iota of feminist bulls~~~ and she is history. Either remove her from the situation, or remove yourself from the situation. If I even detect a hostile TONE anymore, the interaction is over.

Problem solved.

She has two choices. She can be pleasant and enjoyable to spend time with, or she is OUT.
It’s not up to ME how it goes. It’s up to her.

Flatly refuse to ever “defend yourself” against female aggression. As far as I am concerned, this is inconceivable. It’s just not tolerated on any level.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[experiencedParticipant]

I gotta’ admit, I hadn’t considered the original poster’s tactic ever before.
It’s unfortunate that it wasn’t presented in an equal sexes time within the post manner. M-M,M-F, F-M, F-F,TRANS-M,TRANS-F,TRANS-TRANS,..
Let’s say it’s a close in situation like an elevator and the assailant is trying to use a knife against you and you of course have no knife. You’ve got the wrist that’s wielding the knife stabilized, but are somehow losing.
Kick them in the crotch/shin them in the crotch.M-M,F-F,F-M….M-F
“whugh”, there goes a slight slice off your face then it’s my vote to know the option of a painful milking as well. OR one opponent has a weapon and the other is blocking your escape from it.

As for KM, I’d have handled it exactly the way he just did.

And thank you Spank The Mysandrists for the original cartoon.

Knowledge is like a gun, it doesn’t “go off.”
By protecting this site from HORDES of detractors, KM is providing us with a means of attaining much more power.

A lot o’people are up at arms against violence.
Self defense in unimagined situations is another matter.

When it comes to STOPPING an assailant by grabbing and squeezing a titty, I’ve got two things to say:
the left tit is larger and hangs lower.

"It seems like there's times a body gets struck down so low, there ain't a power on earth that can ever bring him up again. Seems like something inside dies so he don't even want to get up again. But he does."

[Anonymous 24]

Keymaster wrote:

A woman once threw a remote control at my head with intent to hit me. She missed but I didn’t throw it back. I took her purse and threw it FAAAAAAAAR into the street. When she ran out screaming after it (and they always do) I bolted the door behind her and didn’t even mail her her shoes.

You sir, are a Pimp.

[SpacemonkeyParticipant 1481]

Keymaster wrote:

C.

Never putting yourself in a situation where you will have to choose either.

With respect KM, you are wrong. It is not always possible to avoid violent wiminz. I think this has been posted before but its worth reminding ourselves of.

http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/stiletto-stabbed-eye-piccadilly-attack-10758082

The only way to avoid violent wiminz is to avoid wiminz completely which pretty much means retreating from society completely. I’m not willing to do that, I would rather stand and fight than run away.

Wiminz need to learn that if they are violent towards a man then there will be consequences and as men cannot rely on the authorities to adequately sanction female offenders that means men must stand up for themselves and fight back.

“Long is the way and hard, that out of Hell leads up to light.”

[Author]

Posts