Julio Iglesias deemed to be father b/c he refused DNA test

[TaxGuyParticipant]

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/spanish-court-rules-julio-iglesias-094153762.html

Women don’t need a man to take a DNA test, they just write his name on the birth certificate and then he is the father (guilty until proven innocent). But refusing to take a DNA test if you are man, well that proves you are the father (guilty until proven innocent). DNA, no DNA, you are the father. The one constant here, if she wants you to be the father, then you are the father. Guilty until proven innocent.

“Iglesias, 75, has sold more than 300 million records in 14 languages, making him the best-selling Latin artist ever. He turned to singing after a car accident in 1963 that ended his burgeoning career as a soccer player.” I’m sure that part is just a coincidence…..

Order the good wine

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22539]

I’d take the test and then countersue the sh1t out of the money-grubbing khunt.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[743 roadmasterParticipant]

The man is 43, damn dude are you so insecure that you need to hear Iglesias is your bio father.

mgtow is its own worst enemy- https://www.campusreform.org/

[Buller100Participant 2189]

Just after money , the kid looks like him… well man looks like him.

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22539]

His lawyer is right though. He’s deemed a father not because of any objective evidence, but solely on the fact he didn’t take a dna test.

I think that is an incredible lack of judicial thought to rule this way.

I mean consider that the very same courts deny men paternity tests to prove they are not fathers, and also the very same courts that ignore genetic proof of dna tests that prove men are not fathers to kids but still demand they pay for kids that are not theirs.

I seriously hope all these corrupt judges and shyster lawyers burn in hell forever for their predetermined mindsets to deliberately destroy men.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[MonkParticipant 17012]

TaxGuy wrote:

DNA, no DNA, you are the father. The one constant here, if she wants you to be the father, then you are the father. Guilty until proven innocent.

Vasectomy for the win.

[WarfishParticipant 408]

Secret Agent MGTOW wrote:

His lawyer is right though. He’s deemed a father not because of any objective evidence, but solely on the fact he didn’t take a dna test.

Since he is going to be legally named the father anyway, no repercussions for taking the DNA test….

[Mr. SpockParticipant 10911]

Monk wrote:

Vasectomy for the win.

The way things are going in this world, I’m not sure that a vasectomy is the silver bullet it once was.

Feminism isn't about equality with men, it's about leverage over men.

[TaxGuyParticipant]

Secret Agent MGTOW wrote:

His lawyer is right though. He’s deemed a father not because of any objective evidence, but solely on the fact he didn’t take a dna test.

Right. I was always taught that taxes were the one place where you were guilty until proven innocent. When the IRS makes an adjustment, the burden of proof is on the taxpayer to prove the IRS wrong.

But apparently that’s not true. It’s the IRS and family court. IF you’re a man.

Order the good wine

[narwhalParticipant]

Reading the comments, I’m amazed at the volume of people who believe the judge made the right call on this. This theory that only the guilty refuse to provide evidence to exonerate themselves is just trash.

BTW, why does this even matter. The assumption would be money, but at age 43, there’s no child support. Back child support? As far as inheritance goes, I’m sure Iglesia can make sure he’s not in the will. What’s to gain by all this?

Ok. Then do it.

[Mr. SpockParticipant 10911]

narwhal wrote:

Reading the comments, I’m amazed at the volume of people who believe the judge made the right call on this. This theory that only the guilty refuse to provide evidence to exonerate themselves is just trash.
BTW, why does this even matter. The assumption would be money, but at age 43, there’s no child support. Back child support? As far as inheritance goes, I’m sure Iglesia can make sure he’s not in the will. What’s to gain by all this?

Setting precedence. The ruling will be used to justify future rulings of similar nature. At some point they will require the man to pay for the test to be administered or else, you pay support for a child that may not be yours. At that point a woman could target ANY man and he must comply and pay for the DNA test or they will automatically rule that it’s his. The effects of this would be devastating for men in the military or prison system.

Feminism isn't about equality with men, it's about leverage over men.

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22539]

Mr. Spock wrote:

narwhal wrote:

Reading the comments, I’m amazed at the volume of people who believe the judge made the right call on this. This theory that only the guilty refuse to provide evidence to exonerate themselves is just trash.BTW, why does this even matter. The assumption would be money, but at age 43, there’s no child support. Back child support? As far as inheritance goes, I’m sure Iglesia can make sure he’s not in the will. What’s to gain by all this?

Setting precedence. The ruling will be used to justify future rulings of similar nature. At some point they will require the man to pay for the test to be administered or else, you pay support for a child that may not be yours. At that point a woman could target ANY man and he must comply and pay for the DNA test or they will automatically rule that it’s his. The effects of this would be devastating for men in the military or prison system.

This is basically forming another type of prison system. Yet another way to extort money from any man a woman wants to target.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[Author]

Posts