Jordan Peterson Analyzes his own Cathy Newman Interview on Channel 4

[DorkShitParticipant 4353]

Puffin Stuff wrote:

Christopher wrote:

why you think that

Because he uses leftist ideas like “universal fairness” and “inherent goodness of people” to sell books to tell men to submit.

A trad con cuck would have just said, in essense, “Because god said so” to sell his books to tell men to submit.

I agree with your analysis Puff.

I also understand that he has not been properly violated, yet.

Brothers like us speak from the ashes of our life. Or, from the rebuilt ashes.

We see it through a filter other’s do not have, yet.

His battle with society has just begun. He is prepared.

If they chop his head off and Kathy Griffin holds it up for all to see, it will be sad. But, mgtow’s will go their way.

He stepped into the minefield. He appears to have good equipment.

I sit in the grandstands watching from a distance.

Peace brothers

[Branched offParticipant 10980]

He stood up for himself and his ideas. He did not bow the knee to the pussy. He may have said some dumb things about us but he is a good guy, doing well. The world needs more men who stand up for themselves and do not bow the knee to gynocentric bulls~~~ to favour their careers.

A woman is like fire -fun to play with, can warm you through and cook your food, needs constant feeding, can burn you and consume all you own

[ChristopherParticipant 2478]

Puffin Stuff wrote:

Because he uses leftist ideas like “universal fairness” and “inherent goodness of people” to sell books to tell men to submit.

If he is telling men to submit (submit to what?) then he is not in alignment with me or MGTOW.

Feminism was funded by bankers/politicians to create more taxpayers. MGTOW IS FREEDOM https://archive.org/details/mgtowisfreedomblurayready

[MonkeyMindParticipant 5340]

Jordan Peterson rocked in this debate. Cathy Newman sucked.

[MemberParticipant 323]

I think that many people unfamiliar with Jordan fail to realize that he is a legitimate genius. He speaks eloquently and very precisely even while under intense pressure. Cathy would have rolled over most men if discussing a “hot” topic such as this one. She tried her best to twist his words, conflate facts, and generally derail his train of thought whenever she could. He was very measured with his responses through it all. She failed to get the angry reaction she was looking for. 90%+ of her targets….er I mean “guests” probably fail this test.

Jordan is the intellectual equivalent of a scalpel…..precise and unrelenting……and he cut through her bulls~~~ quite nicely.

[BrainPilotParticipant 7640]

He seems to have done very well in his interview with this woman. But by very well, I mean he essentially broke even. He didn’t get embarrassed or insulted. He didn’t appear to have been uncomfortable at all during that attack. But, he could have achieved all that while sitting at home on his sofa. In fact, as I sat on my sofa watching that debate, he and I achieved essentially the exact same thing. Only I did it with far less effort and risk than he did. Like him, I didn’t get embarrassed or insulted and was not the least bit uncomfortable watching that exchange.

In a way, it’s sort of a metaphor for marriage. I know guys who have gotten married and not been financially raped in divorce court, not dragged from their home, not relieved of their rights… But I achieved all those same things. By not getting married, I not only achieved all those things, I can just about take them for granted.

He may have gained some benefit in the way of getting himself some publicity for selling his books, lectures etc. Whether he could have achieved that same goal without taking that risk is debatable, but is ultimately his decision to make. For my part, I have found a way to make a living that does not require me to take those risks in order to secure a paycheck. And I have found other ways to achieve what little remaining benefit there is left for men who get married. What little remaining benefit there might be in marriage for men… is available elsewhere at far less cost and risk. I will not criticize him for having assessed the risks and benefits of doing that interview and deciding that it was in his best interest to engage in it.

But he is not sitting at my table and is not playing that hand that I have been dealt. He should not be criticizing me about my decision to go mgtow. Because in my world, I have proven many times over that I am the best qualified person to make the decisions about what is in my best interest. He can theorize all he wants about what might be best for society. But the society he speaks of considers me to be expendable at best, and a deserving blame target for all its self created ills at worst. I do not owe society the fruits of my best efforts anymore than Jonas Salk owed anyone a cure for polio. The fruits of my efforts, like his, are gifts…not debt payments.

If society offered me a social contract that was fair and reasonable, I would probably take it. Until then, I will not be placing my rights and resources on a gaming table that I well know to be corrupted against me.

Look, it's not my fault that tornado dropped a house on your sister. Now get back on your broom and get your ass out of here... and take your monkeys with you

[ChristopherParticipant 2478]

BrainPilot wrote:

He seems to have done very well in his interview with this woman. But by very well, I mean he essentially broke even. He didn’t get embarrassed or insulted. He didn’t appear to have been uncomfortable at all during that attack. But, he could have achieved all that while sitting at home on his sofa. In fact, as I sat on my sofa watching that debate, he and I achieved essentially the exact same thing. Only I did it with far less effort and risk than he did. Like him, I didn’t get embarrassed or insulted and was not the least bit uncomfortable watching that exchange.
In a way, it’s sort of a metaphor for marriage. I know guys who have gotten married and not been financially raped in divorce court, not dragged from their home, not relieved of their rights… But I achieved all those same things. By not getting married, I not only achieved all those things, I can just about take them for granted.
He may have gained some benefit in the way of getting himself some publicity for selling his books, lectures etc. Whether he could have achieved that same goal without taking that risk is debatable, but is ultimately his decision to make. For my part, I have found a way to make a living that does not require me to take those risks in order to secure a paycheck. And I have found other ways to achieve what little remaining benefit there is left for men who get married. What little remaining benefit there might be in marriage for men… is available elsewhere at far less cost and risk. I will not criticize him for having assessed the risks and benefits of doing that interview and deciding that it was in his best interest to engage in it.
But he is not sitting at my table and is not playing that hand that I have been dealt. He should not be criticizing me about my decision to go mgtow. Because in my world, I have proven many times over that I am the best qualified person to make the decisions about what is in my best interest. He can theorize all he wants about what might be best for society. But the society he speaks of considers me to be expendable at best, and a deserving blame target for all its self created ills at worst. I do not owe society the fruits of my best efforts anymore than Jonas Salk owed anyone a cure for polio. The fruits of my efforts, like his, are gifts…not debt payments.
If society offered me a social contract that was fair and reasonable, I would probably take it. Until then, I will not be placing my rights and resources on a gaming table that I well know to be corrupted against me.

I like this analaysis.^

Feminism was funded by bankers/politicians to create more taxpayers. MGTOW IS FREEDOM https://archive.org/details/mgtowisfreedomblurayready

[ChristopherParticipant 2478]

🙂 “So what youre saying is” (compilation from the Cathy Newman vs Jordan Peterson debate)

Feminism was funded by bankers/politicians to create more taxpayers. MGTOW IS FREEDOM https://archive.org/details/mgtowisfreedomblurayready

[bagsofsandParticipant 1391]

Christopher wrote:

Kind of interesting to hear his interpretation of what happened..

Well, sadly not possible to hear since channel 4 blocked the content..

[had_enoughParticipant 29]

Interesting follow-up of the reaction of the public when the Independent “news” outlet did a hit piece related to the interview.

The public are becoming aware…..

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/cathy-newman-abuse-channel-4-jordan-peterson-metoo-backlash-latest-a8170031.html

A new definition that I have not seen before: Social Justice Fascists (SJF’s)

[Author]

Posts