Jesus was a savage MGTOW

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

I just came back from church and the sermon topic today was about Jesus encounter with a samaritan woman by a well. The problem is that the pastor misunderstood what actually took place there. Me being a MGTOW allowed me to understand this little tidbit even better than the pastor did. Here’s the passage:

“John 4
New International Version (NIV)
Jesus Talks With a Samaritan Woman

4 Now he had to go through Samaria. 5 So he came to a town in Samaria called Sychar, near the plot of ground Jacob had given to his son Joseph. 6 Jacob’s well was there, and Jesus, tired as he was from the journey, sat down by the well. It was about noon.
7 When a Samaritan woman came to draw water, Jesus said to her, “Will you give me a drink?” 8 (His disciples had gone into the town to buy food.)
9 The Samaritan woman said to him, “You are a Jew and I am a Samaritan woman. How can you ask me for a drink?” (For Jews do not associate with Samaritans.[a])
10 Jesus answered her, “If you knew the gift of God and who it is that asks you for a drink, you would have asked him and he would have given you living water.”
11 “Sir,” the woman said, “you have nothing to draw with and the well is deep. Where can you get this living water? 12 Are you greater than our father Jacob, who gave us the well and drank from it himself, as did also his sons and his livestock?”
13 Jesus answered, “Everyone who drinks this water will be thirsty again, 14 but whoever drinks the water I give them will never thirst. Indeed, the water I give them will become in them a spring of water welling up to eternal life.”
15 The woman said to him, “Sir, give me this water so that I won’t get thirsty and have to keep coming here to draw water.”
16 He told her, “Go, call your husband and come back.”
17 “I have no husband,” she replied.
Jesus said to her, “You are right when you say you have no husband. 18 The fact is, you have had five husbands, and the man you now have is not your husband. What you have just said is quite true.”

Here’s my interpretation. Jesus – the savage MGTOW

Jesus was pretending to be hitting on this woman by the well by asking for a drink (this was socially accepted way to hit on women that time). She tried to play being hard to get by telling him she’s not talking to him because he’s a Jew. He told her if she only knew what she’s missing – she’d come begging to him for his “living water”. She joked that the well is deep and he doesn’t even have proper equipment (implying that Jesus has a small dick). He said you don’t know who you’re talking to, because if you drank my magic cum – you’d never be thirsty again.(Implying he could save her from being a thirsty shallow basic bitch). So then she dropped the pretense and gave consent – give me that living water then. But Jesus was p~~~ed for her initial rejection and said no – I won’t give you this living water – why would I even talk to a woman? – come back with your husband (if you have one, you useless piece of s~~~) and I’ll talk to him. Then she said she wasn’t married. Jesus said – damn right, nobody wants to marry a piece of s~~~ like you, no wonder you were married five times already, and your current boyfriend wouldn’t even marry you, but technically you haven’t lied to me when you said you have no husband you cheating whore. Now go away

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[Anonymous 42]

Not the way I see it, the end part Jesus said to the tattooed metal face whore, “go and be a feminist no-more”…

[UnicronParticipant 752]

Fictional characters can be anything you want them to be.

Marriage is the process of finding out what kind of man your wife would have preferred.

[Greg HondaParticipant 6406]

Russky wrote:

Here’s my interpretation. Jesus – the savage MGTOW

Interesting interpretation. There are so many ways to interpret the bible. It dosen’t help that the version we got was heavily edited.

Makes me want to read it again with a RedPill mindset.

Unicron wrote:

Fictional characters can be anything you want them to be.

That’s a witty and clever comment. But lets face it, who really knows what went down over 2000 years ago? If it was just a fairy story, then why did the religion grow underground, against violent oppression so quickly?

It became an unstopable force in a short time.

People were no dumber then than they are now. Only the technology of the time dates us.
Maybe they knew something that we’ve forgotten?

It's Time to get Wise

[goodkid43Spectator 550]

Unicron wrote:

Fictional characters can be anything you want them to be.

There are 2.2 billion Christians in the world and 1.8 billion Muslims in the world. The vast majority accept Jesus as an historical figure as fact. And considering that billions have accepted this fact as true for two thousand years previously, those who do not accept Jesus as an historical figure can be considered similar to those who believe in flat earth….

God bless, Michael

[Anonymous 22]

I’d like to think Jesus did all those things. But it’s all really speculation. We can choose to believe in it all or then not.

Personally, I believe that Jesus was here and did all those things, but I have no way of proving that to anybody. It’s all guessing and believing that all the religious books were real.

Religious subjects are interesting in their own way however. It’s very personal.

Interesting!

[MuglintarParticipant 1333]

Russky wrote:

15 The woman said to him, “Sir, give me this water so that I won’t get thirsty and have to keep coming here to draw water.”
16 He told her, “Go, call your husband and come back.”
17 “I have no husband,” she replied.
Jesus said to her, “You are right when you say you have no husband. 18 The fact is, you have had five husbands, and the man you now have is not your husband. What you have just said is quite true.”

in 15, “so I won’t get thirsty” – could be interpreted “so I won’t feel the urge to get f~~~ed” – in such case she would have admitted she had been riding the c~~~ caroussel and now wants Jesus to become her Chad Thunderc~~~ husband. Jesus gave her, by comanding her to give him water, the impression of being extremely self-confident, identifying him as alhpa-male.
in 16, he verifies this commanding type of speech by ordering her to get her husband, when in 17 she has shamefully to admit, she doesn’t have a husband (like him that is). She is related to a beta-provider and now looking for a chad-
in 18 Jesus calls her out for having ridden the c~~~ caroussel for far to often and to be a cheating whore on her current spouse, looking to improve her social status on first opportunity.

Jesus = Chad Thunderc~~~, the samatrarian bitch a, egocentric whore – conlusion: AWALT, for more than 2000 years – my interpretation

"Him, who delights in solitude, is either a wild beast or a GOD!" - Aristotle (Aristot. Pol. 1.1253a) 1 Hom. Il. 9.63; the passage goes on: ἐστὶν ἐκεῖνος ι ὃς πολέμου ἔραται.

[UnicronParticipant 752]

goodkid43 wrote:

…..

How many people buy into the whole patriarchy is keeping women down narrative?

Just because people believe in something, doesn’t make it true, or right.

Marriage is the process of finding out what kind of man your wife would have preferred.

[narwhalParticipant]

I think I’m going to go with your pastors interpretation…whatever it is.

Seriously, why would that conversation be a veiled conversation about sex? Water is not a metaphor for cum, and Jesus’s typical behavior isn’t about ‘get away from me bitch’.

Ok. Then do it.

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

narwhal wrote:

Seriously, why would that conversation be a veiled conversation about sex?

Because in the sermon he explained that throughout the Bible it was mentioned many times that men of that time would pick out wives by going to a well of some village, wait for women to show up getting water, and then ask for a drink. And the ones that would give you a drink – were available

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[Anonymous 2]

Don’t forget, whoever wrote the gospel of John, wasn’t John himself.
And boy did he do a good job in covering up the real event of things.

[Author]

Posts