Home › Forums › MGTOW Central › Jesus Christ, Someone Get Her DNA and QUICK
This topic contains 13 replies, has 11 voices, and was last updated by Zuberi Tau 4 years, 5 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
I can’t believe what I’ve just read. She still has some “crap” in there, but I’m wondering if someone has made her write this at gunpoint.
Could a female……….actually be acknowledging……….no. It can’t be.
Again the talk revolves around being insulted by some abstract bulls~~~. She doesn’t say one word about taking equal responsibility.
I didn’t believe a word she wrote.
Don't let them Blame, Shame or Tame you!
Give 'em NOTHING, not even an answer!
#GenderSegragationNow!Not one word about what’s being done to men ….. not one fking word.
She stands by and watches what happens and only cares about herself.
Sorry … no dna sample for me.
Just another bitch out for herself. No quater given.
Again the talk revolves around being insulted by some abstract bulls~~~. She doesn’t say one word about taking equal responsibility.
Excellent point. Perhaps I was just so impressed that it could form abstract thought at all.
I didn’t believe a word she wrote.
Hard to believe anything they say.
Not one word about what’s being done to men ….. not one fking word. She stands by and watches what happens and only cares about herself. Sorry … no dna sample for me. Just another bitch out for herself. No quater given.
I’d still like the DNA. If anything, just to check to see if it’s human.
I do find it remarkable that the story was on the front page of the digital version of the Calgary Sun for all of three hours, before it was replaced with three “rape articles”.
She tried to sound as a NAWALT unicorn, but she failed because didn’t say a thing about men problems or giving responsibilities to women.
I need more articles from her to decide if her DNA is worthy to keep.
We are at the dawn of a New Era. We are the Vanguard.-Greg Honda.
She tried to sound as a NAWALT unicorn, but she failed because didn’t say a thing about men problems or giving responsibilities to women. I need more articles from her to decide if her DNA is worthy to keep.
A great point about the NAWALT thing.
I might have overreacted, and got sucked into the NAWALT thing rather quickly. A moment of weakness if you will. I think I was probably shocked that the article actually made it’s way onto mainstream news. However, your NAWALT observation is incredibly important and most likely hits the nail on the head. Probably meant to be a small, meaningless concession if anything.
Excellent, excellent observations brothers.
She tried to sound as a NAWALT unicorn, but she failed because didn’t say a thing about men problems or giving responsibilities to women.
I need more articles from her to decide if her DNA is worthy to keep.
Actually, she did mention that they say climate change and finances are “men’s problems” even though they’re things everyone deals with in actuality. She also said that women need to “stand up for themselves” instead of just giving in to the victim complex BS and whining all day. This stuff is wedged in at the bottom of the article in the last handful of paragraphs.
I still second needing to see more from her over a prolonged time period to tell if she’s genuine or just fed up with feminist bulls~~~ right now.
Beauty fades, dumb is forever.
I still second needing to see more from her over a prolonged time period to tell if she’s genuine or just fed up with feminist bulls~~~ right now.
Yes, for sure. Since I tend to gravitate so far away from most mainstream media, and was sucked in to reading the article at the Sun by way of an ad, it would be hard to say what sort of pattern she’s laid in terms of her belief systems etc. without further reading.
I suppose I could go over previous articles which she’s written, but I’d run the risk of reading more than one article in a row penned by a woman, and I’m already retarded enough.
These NAWALT wannabes need to stop. They write this to get guys to like them and also to feel like strong women who are better than the other feminists. Women love telling other women what do. Like a queen bee. I good points but at the end of the day it’s the same sh*t but from a different dog.
I have discovered a truly remarkable list of reasons why women are not necessary for a happy life, but alas this margin is too small to contain it.
The NAWALTs have to outnumber the AWALTs for there to be a culture shift.
I vote for supporting their direction of thought away from the feminist.
But, like men, don’t give credit for good thoughts. Only reward good deeds.
Anonymous1Okay, just to set the record straight, THERE ARE NO NAWALTS. One point that Turd Flinging Monkey (a mgtow youtuber) made in one of his videos, is that EVERY WOMAN is a FEMINIST and here how you know that: if you ever hear a woman stating “she is not a feminist”, ask her than if she would give up the rights feminists gave them that are unfair to man? The answer will likely be “no”.
So those woman that are now “claiming not be oppressed”, or “not being a feminist”, or bein a “NAWALT” are ALL the same. They say what they think MEN want to hear to not LOSE the many proviledges they have as females. I say: f~~~ them (or better yet, DON’T f~~~ them, since they might like the opposite). Give them nothing.
A few days ago I met a woman making videos on youtube saying she supports the “moderate Mgtows” and that the “extreme Mgtows” were as bad as the feminists. Who were the extrmist mgtows, on her view? Anyone that don’t believe on NAWALTs. As I pushed forward her arguments on the comment section, she revealed her true self: she was a tradcon. She believes that on a men-woman relationship one have to take the responsabilities, but she doesn’t say anything about the RIGHTS (Oh no, those have to be equal, and the responsabilities are for the MEN only).
Here is one of her pearls:
Just realize oftentimes in order for the male-female union to work someone has to be the primary ruler and in order to be the ruler someone has to be able to stand up to the responsibility that comes with that position otherwise everything decompensates. Men like you are the extreme feminists best companion and top reason for expanding the feminist agenda. You are a great argument for feminism and theories on the cognitive deficit of males in general. You can’t have it both ways despite how you think you can. At the rate you are going the human race won’t exist long enough for males to exist with the sci-fi advances some pseudo or extreme mgtows state is on the horizon. So go put on your low class trailer trash dress on and rant like a girl who doesn’t know better (a subpar one) instead of like the man your plumbing may have once suggested.
Notice the fear mongering of “think of the humanity” and the “man up” shaming tactics in the end.
Later, in an attempt to “support” the so called “moderate mgtow” she gave her reasons, which were:
A quick note for all the MGTOW individuals who think women want to capture them: I believe you should be alone if you want to be. Truly it is better for women for you to avoid relationships with them. Far better in fact than it would be for you to get involved with them if you aren’t fully capable of what it takes to have a fully functional relationship with a woman. Please note this statement is not intended to indicate you are a predator or anything of that nature. Nonetheless, those who have no relationship valuable currency to offer need not apply. Currency in this statement does NOT mean money or being a doormat btw.
Now, one might ask, what is a man must have to have a fully functional relationship with a woman? Well, Serena responds with THIS GOLDEN GEM:
Here we go children. Thank you to Randy Andretti. I haven’t watched the whole thing, but thus far this seems far more rational: https://youtu.be/3qHnIp-WzCI
And if you are asking yourself what is the link she gave… Well… the info wars video about NEO MASCULINITY!
So here we have, a woman claiming to be talking about NARCISSISTIC and PREDATORIAL MEN, promoting a philosophy from no other than ROOSH f~~~ing V.
So these are the now “moderate mgtows”! I guess the Roosh V didn’t catch as much as he wished for.
And it gets better, this is her comment as I realize what she considers “mgtow” and make fun of the video she posted:
Yes I already know you don’t have what it takes for the new-mascu.. stuff or anything like it, such as the simpler reality from the past. You don’t have it.So yeah, aparently I am not a good provider for the laydizzz…This is where I lost it and had to hold my laughter at work.
So the moral of the story is this: don’t fool yourself. If woman are the way they are because of nature or nuture is uncertain to me. HOWEVER, note that women were raised to ALWAYS see men as a TOOL. Forget that at your own peril.
Cheers.
The NAWALTs have to outnumber the AWALTs for there to be a culture shift.
I vote for supporting their direction of thought away from the feminist.
But, like men, don’t give credit for good thoughts. Only reward good deeds.My thinking exactly: Words are written on the winds, only deeds matter. Trouble is, NAWALTs are like winning lottery tickets. They must exist, but I’ve never seen one. The losing lottery tickets, there is a superabundance of them.
Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?
Another Nawalt chameleon trying to cover her ass.
Nothing to see here, move along!
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678