Its time to hyde your ass – because feminists are dangerous

[ChangedParticipant 588]

I found the following news and found that:

More than two thirds of Britons support gender equality – but just seven per cent would call themselves feminists.

So 7% are brave feminist but the others 23% or more are hiding and hunt us like the Nazi. How is this world different than the jungle were the snake hunts other animals ?
This is Animal Farm brothers.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/life/only-7-per-cent-of-britons-consider-themselves-feminists/

Matriarchy taxes us. Patriarchy taxes us. No Fucks Given! If they give us pains, lets give them pains. Daily.

[Anonymous 25]

When split out by gender, women were more likely to identify as feminist, with nine per cent using the label

So at least roughly 1 in 10 women are man haters with a mental illness. Then add on top of that the hidden ones

Younger women were more likely to call themselves feminist, with 19 per cent aged 18-24 using the word,

And at least roughly 1 in 5 younger women are dangerous man haters. Then you can add on top of that figure the hidden ones.

I suspect the infection is also geographically concentrated in certain areas too, which are liekly to correspond to the areas he Women’s Nazi Equality Party are attempting to gain seats.

This is why men need a bodycam and dash cam when they are out anywhere nowadays. Not only may it protect you, you could get lucky and get hard evidence of feminist corruption if they try and of their false allegation crap.

Crazy f~~~ers are trying to bring in street harassment here now, so if crazy says you wolf whistled at her an innocent man goes to jail even if she’s lying and there’s no evidence.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Changed wrote:

More than two thirds of Britons support gender equality – but just seven per cent would call themselves feminists.

That doesn’t mean they are “dangerous”, it means they are not thinking clearly.

Who the f~~~ can pretend there is a such a thing as “gender equality”, which – according to a feminist spokesperson at the UN – means “political & socio-economic equality of the sexes” . . . when women aren’t even equal TO EACH OTHER.

Moreover, the feminist spokesperson who pretended that stupid s~~~ would never willingly forfeit her “political & socio-economic” status in the name of being “equal” with all other women who enjoy no such thing.

So it’s no wonder only 7% would admit to being a “feminist”. WHO EVER WOULD? The other 2/3RDS of “gender equality” Brits probably include the 50% of the population where women, wives and girlfriends are perpetrating mass paternity fraud across the pond. And that’s only in cases where women agree to the test.

YESS!!! “GENDER EQUALITY”!!! IGNORE THE MASSIVE FRAUD!!! JUST “GENDER EQUALITY”!!!

You can practically hear the obese british feminists scarfing down their bangers-n-mash between sentences. They are not dangerous. They are useful idiots who have doomed themselves and selected themselves for extinction.

If British feminists actually believed in the imaginary concept of “gender equality”, they would first need to achieve equality between WOMEN. And women will never will agree to that , because hideously fugly feminists will disrupt a beauty pageant and try to stop more attractive women from falling over themselves to compete for a crown.

The war of feminists is not about “gender”.
They are at war with other women who have no interest in being “equal” with them.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Anonymous 25]

Keymaster wrote:

You can practically hear the obese british feminists scarfing down their bangers-n-mash between sentences

yeah you can spot the feminists here, they look like a bulldog licking p~~~ off a nettle. It brings a whole new meaning to the ‘British Bulldog’. That reminded me of this story I nearly posted yesterday (fat feminists aren’t happy that a Russian journalist told the truth about women’s rolls of fat on display in public):

Fury after writer for Russia’s biggest newspaper claims Manchester is full of ‘fat people’, gays and women who ‘don’t mind when their stomachs hang down and won’t fit into their jeans’

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4473872/Manchester-fat-people-says-Russian-newspaper.html

They can whinge all they like but the Russian reporter has a point:

[AttonParticipant]

The simple truth is if you want a more equal society for women and men then you are in fact a feminist.

There is also another truth women supported feminism while it gave them privilege. They abandon it whenever it threatens their privilege, men are waking up-to feminists bulls~~~. They reject feminism to avoid those same men from going further down the rabbit hole. None of this changes the fact that most British women are some of the most misandrist bitches on Earth.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[AwakenedParticipant 35216]

It doesn’t really matter Who they are, or how many there are if you’re GHOSTING….

In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash

[Anonymous 0]

This strike me as misleading.
It is possible for someone to support gender equality without being a feminist, there be two different questions here-

1. Do you support gender equality?
2. Are you a feminist?

Point A
Feminists are not after equality, they are after preferential treatment and an all passes licence to be a c~~~ and get what they want at the expense of men without reason or accountability.

Point B
In a fair straight talking world my honest answer to 1. would have to be yes. Hear me out before you revoke my mancard.
In a truly gender equal society there would be no need for special treatment in the workplace because everybody would be judged based on merit alone (which results in women losing, so see point A).
In an equal legal system decisions would need to be made based on logic and facts so the good guys can win (point A).
Gender equal body choice, my sperm my choice, my future baby my choice. Lady no likey (point A)

I could even get on board with some level of enforced equality in hiring (again hear me out).
Last year there was a Lord somesuch t~~~ on the news saying there should be a quota for female board members in big business. I got in a few rows with colleagues when I mounted my soapbox on this one.
All or nothing I said. They can have their 50% on the board but in return I want 50% male midwifes, 50% male nurses, 50% male receptionists, 50% school teachers, 50% male HR dept staff, and for the ladies 50% women bin/garbageMEN (lifters not drivers) 50% women miners, 50% firmen, 50% women police (in the street and no you cant pick which one) etc etc etc… and the key vote swinger 50% female ‘frontline’ serving troops. (good ol point A)
When you ask a bitch to state out loud that her equality extends to agreeing to those terms she will switch to abusive dismissive screech mode.

answer 1. demonstrate to me that such a thing can REALLY exist then ask again.

answer 2. hell to the motherf~~~ing no.

[Anonymous 1]

I am more dangerous than them.

[ChangedParticipant 588]

Awakened wrote:

It doesn’t really matter Who they are, or how many there are if you’re GHOSTING….

Its useful when GHOSTING becomes a second nature to men but I dont know how many men or how many of us do that every day.

Many other good points to remember in this topic:
– body camera permanently
– women aren’t even equal TO EACH OTHER.
(For so many years I didn’t even think about this argument, and you meant to say – women doing the same job and same location and working hours. Because if I don’t say that the motherf~~~ers with a “Be nice policy” will attack and will compare apples with pears.
Be nice to a snake, really ?

Matriarchy taxes us. Patriarchy taxes us. No Fucks Given! If they give us pains, lets give them pains. Daily.

[StargazerParticipant 12505]

They’re all feminists… they just don’t want the unsavory attachment to the title. So long as they believe in men paying for dates, no-fault divorces, alimony and “chivalry” or “being treated like a lady”, they’re feminists.

Show me a woman who says “I offer to pay for half on dates, I don’t want to be married because I don’t want a man to think I’m after his cash and prizes and I prefer to be treated fairly over being treated special… oh, and if I get up in someone’s face and threaten them with violence, I fully expect them to kick the s~~~ out of me.” and I will show you a woman who MAY not be a feminist… though I suspect she’d change her tune without notice.

[Author]

Posts