It is not about who you are, it is what you have and can do for the female

[Enjoy The DeclineParticipant 1719]

It is a well known fact that you can attract girls in two ways. Either you attract them with your combination of personality and looks or you can attract them based on what you have and what you can do for them.

If you go by based on personality and looks alone, you would probably use your charisma to entertain the female all the time to the point where you would probably get fed up, because you always have to look your best charismatic wise all the time, which would probably even drain you in the long run. I know a guy for instance who has great charisma and even got a lot of people liking him because of his ability to entertain. But I noticed that now he reached a point of his life that he just doesn’t give a cr*p what people think of him anymore, because being charismatic all the time involves a lot of work, so instead he lives by the quote that his absence makes people grow more fonder to him. I even found what he is doing as one of the rules in the 48 laws of power book.

If you go by attracting girls based on what you have and what you can do for them, in reality, as long as you can make the money, this way is actually more practical than always working on finding new innovative ways to entertain her. But here is the thing, it is custom in our society that many females always expects the guy to take care of them in the long run. So in the end, you can have all the charisma you want, but lots of girls prefer to have a guy for what he has and what can do for her, because in the end, she would want to have a family with that person, and all the charisma in the world cannot help her have a family for obvious reasons. I am not saying that all girls who want a family do it because they do not want to work anymore by the way, but I think that there is at least a large amount of them that do use family as a way to not work anymore all together.

So my point to all of this is that it is not who you are, it is what you have or what you can do for the female. As for the female herself, she just has to look pretty and she might just have a guy who would save her from sh*t like back problems where she cannot lift up heavy things, depression or anything else that a white knight would be more than happy to save her from. I know this because even I tried to be a white knight at one point, and I have also seen other white knights putting themselves in danger to save some of the most f*cked up girls just because those same girls so happen to be pretty.

I just wanted to give out some insights here.

"Question everything" - Albert Einstein

[GonzoZiiByrnnarParticipant 195]

I tried hard not to be in either of the the two categories. I think what you are saying about entertaining and charisma is a lot like the comedian burnout… people like Jim Carrey and Adam Sandler who spent their whole lives and whose sole purpose seemed to be making other people laugh…at some point they break down and want to be taken seriously. Id hate to be a comedian for that reason, and I definitely wouldn’t want to entertain a female just for the sake of sex or her “delightful” company.

Rule Of T.A.W.E.D. Trust a woman = Death

[VarunParticipant 2981]

Yes, that is true.

In this context, even the opposite is true. We hardy give a damn about a woman’s self-worth.

Ok, she might be the most successful women in the world. But if she’s not a pretty thing to look at, our interest subsides.

From a shallow perspective, a man is measured by his wealth and status, and, until recent times, by how much he can ‘control’ people, things, situations, etc.

Our good old @Mg-tower might talk about how he cleaned his chicken coop or how he made a fine barbecue, but people will only be interested in how much money he makes.

Mr. MgTower, how much do you make annually?

There’s even a proven experiment for it:

A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.

[sidecarParticipant 35862]

Enjoy The Decline wrote:

It is a well known fact that you can attract girls in two ways.

There’s a third way: ignoring them.

If you go by based on personality and looks alone, you would probably use your charisma to entertain the female all the time to the point where you would probably get fed up,

I find the opposite is true. The more you cater to them and try to entertain them, the less interested they become in you. When you ignore them outright then they desperately try to find ways to entertain you.

[Deadly RaverParticipant]

Look up Gold digger videos on YouTube. Add the word,”Owned” or”Prank” to that phrase and hit search. I won’t tell you what to think. You’ll see for yourself.

Learn from the past, Control the present, and you will know the Future.

[Enjoy The DeclineParticipant 1719]

sidecar wrote:

If you go by based on personality and looks alone, you would probably use your charisma to entertain the female all the time to the point where you would probably get fed up,

I find the opposite is true. The more you cater to them and try to entertain them, the less interested they become in you. When you ignore them outright then they desperately try to find ways to entertain you.

I usually enjoy reading your posts because you are usually very crisp with your opinions, but let’s be realistic here. I do not think that many girls that feel that they are entitled in life are going to go out of their way to work in a relationship at all. If these same females have no use for you, I doubt that they would even want to be with you or let alone even entertain you. I would like to point out that I am just talking about the females who think that they are entitled to have the guy do most or all of the work.

"Question everything" - Albert Einstein

[Silverstone the SecondParticipant]

Women expect men to bring all this s~~~ to the table, and all women bring is a pussy, it’s pathetic. If that’s all you bring, that’s all you have and that’s all you are, then expect to be treated like that.

Feminism is a movement where opinions are presented as facts and emotions are presented as evidence.

[bigboy83Participant 11312]

Pretty much. Yet they cry over men wanting their bodies, haha, they wish. We just need 15 min f~~~, we’re good.

Shit Tested, Cunt Approved.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22595]

Enjoy The Decline wrote:

If you go by attracting girls based on what you have and what you can do for them, in reality, as long as you can make the money, this way is actually more practical than always working on finding new innovative ways to entertain her.

Such tactics use to be fairly safe in getting laid.

Now, showing how much you have to a woman is just like waving money in from of thieves. Women are just plotting how to use the courts to take everything you have and give it to her.

[FreedomParticipant 295]

Personhood isn’t intrinsically attractive. That works both ways. Take your favorite unicorn and make her ugly, fat, and mean, and you will stop liking her too.

You don’t like “who she is,” you like the feelings she evokes in you. She doesn’t like “who you are,” she likes the feelings you evoke in her.

That is the nature of desire. The only problem here is when we expect that it should be otherwise.

It is wise to fear dangerous commitments.

[Buller100Participant 2189]

Women only want men for what they can help them with, of that there is no doubt.

Once they are past first love as a teenager, but when they are mothers their only aim is financial support for their children, that’s just nature and to be expected.

Sadly some men fail to realize that, time and time again.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Enjoy The Decline wrote:

It is not about who you are, it is what you have and can do for the female

Don’t forget – and this is not a correction – but it’s really NOT about what you have and can do for her. It’s only about what she thinks you have — and what she thinks you can do for her — or what she can steal from you. You don’t actually NEED to have looks, money, power or fame….. it only needs to take place in her f~~~ing head.

This distinction is important because women will f~~~ a man who has nothing – and can do nothing for her – just because she thinks he can. Women had sex with Lionel Ritchie just because he could sing.

A man could say “hello I’m a doctor” (or a film producer) and she will be more likely to fall flat on her back with her legs in the air faster than he can drop a bunch of flowers or a job offer.

Enjoy The Decline wrote:

So my point to all of this is that it is not who you are, it is what you have or what you can do for the female.

Even if you’re REALLY a doctor, and you’re totally unwilling to give her a house, she will actually think spreading her legs entitles her to part of it. Even if she marries you.

Your observation is accurate, but you don’t actually have to BE …… WILLING or able to do anything for her at all. The whore will still have sex on credit and expect to cash in later.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[sidecarParticipant 35862]

Enjoy The Decline wrote:

I usually enjoy reading your posts because you are usually very crisp with your opinions,

But this isn’t an opinion. This is my own experience and observation.

I do not think that many girls that feel that they are entitled in life are going to go out of their way to work in a relationship at all.

But we are not talking about relationships here. We are talking about attraction. That’s something completely different.

If these same females have no use for you,

But they don’t know that. And they can’t know that if you are ignoring them. The only way they have of finding out if you have anything to offer them is by approaching you.

If you instead approach them and try to woo them with either personality or wealth or whatever, then you leave them in no doubt what you have to offer, and then they are able to decide for themselves if you are worth their time and assess what they can get from you for the minimum effort from them.

I am just talking about the females who think that they are entitled to have the guy do most or all of the work.

Oh no. They are by far the easiest, and it’s precisely because of that sense of entitlement. They believe men owe them, and so it drives them that much more nuts when a man gives them nothing, not even attention. So they will do anything to “fix” that.

Try it some time. Ignore a woman in mixed company. You can pick the most entitled bitch present, or just pick one at random. It doesn’t really matter because AWALT. Talk to her friends instead of her, especially her female friends. You will make a much larger impression on her than you ever could by approaching her.

[Enjoy The DeclineParticipant 1719]

sidecar wrote:

I am just talking about the females who think that they are entitled to have the guy do most or all of the work.

Oh no. They are by far the easiest, and it’s precisely because of that sense of entitlement. They believe men owe them, and so it drives them that much more nuts when a man gives them nothing, not even attention. So they will do anything to “fix” that.

What a good observation. Almost equivalent to a woman playing hard to get with you.

"Question everything" - Albert Einstein

[Clockwork PenguinParticipant 50]

I will never understand this…

I mean, I get it, fundamentally, but… Men are’t the ones with the extremely limited shelf life. Men are the ones why typically are the bread winners. And even though said man is out, busying himself winning said bread, he still has to come home and do all the actual work around the house.

Wouldn’t it make more sense for the women to be throwing all there assets at the men to keep us around? Even if there only assets are there ASSets, shouldn’t they be trying to be an olympic gymnist about it? Seems like most women think that we should hand them the world, just because they lay there with there legs slightly parted like a dead and gutted fish. Despite the degree of pleasure involved, if I have to continue ‘working’ just to enjoy the only ASSet that women have to offer…I think I can find more effective and enjoyable ways of burning calories and getting my cardio on..

[VarunParticipant 2981]

Keymaster wrote:

Enjoy The Decline wrote:

It is not about who you are, it is what you have and can do for the female

Don’t forget – and this is not a correction – but it’s really NOT about what you have and can do for her. It’s only about what she thinks you have — and what she thinks you can do for her — or what she can steal from you. You don’t actually NEED to have looks, money, power or fame….. it only needs to take place in her f~~~ing head.

I had a PUA friend who explained the same thing to me. Back when I was al naive, I asked him how he was so successful with women. He said, “If you make two mistakes, a man will not forgive yu the third time; but a woman will. They love what they hear; so whatever you say, if you say it with a serious, stressed up tone, they’ll believe you.

A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.

[Author]

Posts