It is easy to reverse a conservative government but not a liberal government

[Enjoy The DeclineParticipant 1719]

Usually, the liberals call themselves progressives and the more people start letting them apply liberal ideologies, the more it is harder for the government to stay the same like they use to be in the past. For example, in Canada, the liberal government implemented free health care for all. This in the end leads towards a bigger government. When the conservatives went in power after the liberals lost, the conservative prime minister Steven Harper did not even dare take away free health care for all, because free health care became something everybody is use to, along with the free health care’s poor quality of service compared to that of the U.S. You also see people in the Republican like Ron Paul who dares to campaign for no federal and no state taxes at all like it was like over 100 years ago to have smaller government and look how that went(people literally sabotaged his campaign which was out of his control). So my point is that the more the government changes with all the feminist liberal agenda stuff that is being pushed(calling it being progressive), the harder it is for us to be the same like we once were. What do you guys think?

"Question everything" - Albert Einstein

[Enjoy The DeclineParticipant 1719]

I am not saying that I agree or disagree with being a progressive by the way. I consider myself a moderate conservative.

"Question everything" - Albert Einstein

[jasonstylinSpectator 82]

I think the voting process in Western democracies (particularly Canada and US) is extremely manipulated and is more an illusion of choice than actual choice. In the US, the Dems and the Reps are pretty much the same party. Theyre both liberal. There exists no legitimate opposition or truly right wing choice. The only difference between the 2 parties is the time at which they are prepared to make compromises. Dems are 10 to 15 years agead of the curve but thats really it. Republicans have compromised on every single issue (gay rights, gay marriage, abortion, women’s rights) just that theyve done so more gradually.

So there is no legitimate alternative and so much of the public’s perception of the voting process is determined by the media which is inherently biased.

I also have serious doubts that votes are actually counted and recorded accurately.

[bomwaParticipant 488]

I think it’s all a cycle. And as long as you are non-violent and avoid conflict you should survive.

I was only thinking about this last night. Progressive/liberal ideology seems to have ‘equality’ at its root. Essentially, they advocate breaking down all the laws/customs/traditions etc. that foster inequality. However, I realised that by doing this they will actually increase inequality to extreme levels. The reason is because once there are no more conventions which provide guidance for bettering oneself, only those who are smart/strong/cunning/sensible/wise enough will be able to find the path to self-actualisation.

The liberal/progressive utopia is one where you can do whatever you like with no social stigma. But if you are not smart enough to see that some things you do are incredibly self-destructive then you are going to end up having a terrible life. Women and feminism are a great example. Women are allowed to do whatever it is their emotionally driven brains come up with. And we are now seeing the results of what happens when a woman goes down that path. And we are also seeing the lives of feminist/mangina/white knight men being destroyed too (sorry for those MGTOW who formerly fit into this category).

Gay marriage: BRING IT ON! Let gay men now experience divorce rape. How long until someone starts GGTOW.com?

Open immigration: FANTASTIC. If you’re smart enough to cater to the immigrants you’ll make some good money. The others will find their jobs being taken by the immigrants.

Gun control: AWESOME. If you’re smart enough to avoid crowds and high crime areas then your odds of being hit in a mass shooting are slim. Does a ghost need a firearm?

Free health care: YES PLEASE! If you are smart enough to realise that health care is not a science, that the placebo effect is more likely than a clinical effect (in everything from physiotherapy, drugs, to surgery) you will avoid having anything to do with the health system. If you are intelligent enough (or simply genetically gifted enough) to prevent the development of sickness then what does it matter about health care? Millions of people are killed by the health system. Millions of others have their time stolen from them by it. If you want to go to hospital DO IT! You won’t find me there.

Liberalism is perfect freedom. It is the freedom to totally destroy yourself and everyone around you. I think conservatives should actually welcome it. Because, it will really sort the men from the boys.

The fact is that there is a set of behaviours that are conducive for a good life. These behaviours are not relative. They do not change with time. So, as long as you live according to them what does it matter what others do? If anything, it will make your life easier because the competition will be destroying themselves.

Think about this. Imagine a hypothetical NAWALT in a sea of feminist AWALTs. That NAWALT could literally live like a queen for her entire life while the AWALTs sink further and further into self-destruction. An AWALT is not happy, she consumes anti-depressants, goes from one meaningless relationship to another, spends years being lonely as a single mum, never finds satisfaction in her career, kids grow up resenting her, etc. But if we had traditional conservative family values and laws then the NAWALT would have to compete against the AWALTs. The AWALTs true nature would not be revealed to those who are smart enough to see it.

Liberalism is a gift because it takes all the guess work out of life. The morons now literally go around with “MORON” stamped on their foreheads. We should be celebrating this development.

[BlacqueJacqueShellacqueParticipant 6890]

jasonstylin wrote:

more an illusion of choice than actual choice

Pretty deceitful tactic used by the moocher class since demonocracy’s inception. 51% of the voting populace voting away 49% voting populace’s rights on any given topic. Those who do not work, promising those who do not work, the people who do work’s money. The people who do work are at a tipping point.

[Enjoy The DeclineParticipant 1719]

So what Bomwa is basically saying is that in a Democratic Socialist world, there is going to be less competition, because many people do not even have to compete to earn a living. If there is less competition, life should be easier for the person who do want to get ahead in life. I never really thought of it that way. Thanks for the insight.

"Question everything" - Albert Einstein

[bomwaParticipant 488]

Enjoy The Decline wrote:

So what Bomwa is basically saying is that in a Democratic Socialist world, there is going to be less competition, because many people do not even have to compete to earn a living. If there is less competition, life should be easier for the person who do want to get ahead in life. I never really thought of it that way. Thanks for the insight.

The reason there will be less competition is because people are allowed to do whatever they want. But the majority of people want to do things that ultimately harm themselves. Let’s look at debt for example.

Debt used to be something only sensible business people could access. Overtime, through the advent of central banking and Keynesianism, debt has been extended to basically every person on Earth. And the key is that debt has become available for consumer purchases, where before it was only available for business purchases. But who here will say that going into debt for a consumer item is a good thing?

It is a terrible thing for your personal finances. Credit card debt and student loans are a huge burden. So, by simply working your brain to avoid those two debts you have automatically put yourself ahead of X% of the population.

Debt for all is a liberal move because it theoretically equalises access to credit. But not everyone is actually able to use this to benefit themselves. In fact, as we clearly see, a great number of people destroy themselves with debt.

I see liberalism as the force that removes ALL warning and hazard signs from the environment. In fact, in some cases it even encourages people to do stupid things. Now, in a world with no hazard signs, only the smart will make it through relatively unscathed.

[chirParticipant]

Democracies only last as long as it takes the voters to realize they can vote themselves entitlements.
We are near the end game.
Once democracies fail they always result in totalitarian regimes or despotic regimes.
Liberal democracies will always fail when they run out of other peoples money. Same as socialist democracies.

It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion, it is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shaking, the shaking becomes a warning; it is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion.

[Author]

Posts