Is Christina Hoff Sommers just another filthy mule pretending to be a Unicorn?

[The Manipulated ManParticipant 1856]

Dr. Christina Hoff Sommers is a philosophy professor who has some poignant criticisms of modern feminism. Her talks and YouTube posts are fun and wonderful. She is a lovely feminine woman. She is definitely the “Unicorn” of Modern Philosophy.

I have two issues with her talks which have raised red flags.

The first red flag is that she claims, in one of her talks, that women are more cooperative than men. This appears like a minor blunder, but it is really a major pillar of feminist’s propaganda. Woman appear to be cooperative on the surface, but in groups they sound like a bunch of hens clucking. Women’s Nature disrupts every institution that women dominate. Even Dr. Sommers compares a National Feminists Conference to an insane asylum or gathering of people who suffer from “Borderline Personality disorder.”

It is men who are better at cooperating. Much of men’s team work is often nonverbal. It goes without saying that the great things in human civilization were created by the cooperation of men.

The second red flag has to do with her “moderate” feminist position which appears as if she is just humbly asking for equality for women, like voting rights and fair wages for equal work. She only wants an egalitarian world.

MGTOWs know that giving voting rights to women was the end of “Civilization.” Woman are effectively adult children who have the parasitic abilities of the mythical vampire. These adult children will always vote irresponsibility and will never understand what it takes to build and maintain a Civilization.

A fertile feminine woman has pheromones, pleasing appearance, softness, and behavior which leaves men at a disadvantage, especially men with an abundance of testosterone. Esther Vilar’s book, “The Manipulated Man,” does a fine job of describing these advantages. Western woman already had too many advantages before they were given the vote and “No Fault Divorces.”

Dr. Sommers’ characterization of the historical inequality of Western Women, which made her become a Feminist, is propaganda. It suggests the myth of the “dreaded Patriarchy.” The actual inequality was always in favor of women.

Men always had to fight the wars, do hard labor, and risk their lives doing dangerous work.

There will never be equal work with women involved. Paying anyone who cannot work or behaves unhelpfully, is foolishness.

The attractive women will always have men doing their work for them on a job site.

The ugly woman who are willing and motivated to work, can never really cooperate with men.

Moderate feminists like Dr. Sommers are really greedy beasts with an insatiable appetite for power and attention.

Nevertheless, her talks are informative and she does make some attempts to defend men against the voracious attacks of the radical feminists.

Here is her “debate” in Minnesota with Milo Yiannopoulos:

Here is an interesting talk she had with Gad Saad:

What happens when a man finally comprehends the cold and calculating thoughts that are going through a woman's mind, while her eyes are brimming with tears?

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

She is a feminist.

I think she sees what is happening to men and realized that in the long run it will hurt females more.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[Anonymous 12]

She’s just trying to make a buck by being the friendly/less hostile face of feminism.

In the end she wants supremacy as much as the #killallmen crowd, she just wants men to submit without knowing they are submitting.

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

Yeah, I saw her with Milo and she appeared very disingenuous to me. Like every time she says something – she tried to pander to the audience and weigh her responses accordingly. She contradicts herself and then walks back. It’s like she tries to find a middle ground, but this is not what she believes in

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[Anonymous 3]

The mere attention she receives is a testament of gynocentrism. You weren’t calling somebody like Marc Rudov “lovely” were you? There are a ton of manosphere content producers who say the same things, but it’s always the one woman who receives the most attention. Then guys come out and call her an unicorn, oh so feminine, special, and all that fluff.

It’s like that one thread here the other day. Some poster was calling this alleged female player a badass because she was doing well on the scoreboard, and made a thread about it. Yeah, countless of male players have been doing the same thing, most even better, but none of them got a thread, the girl did however. What’s that called? Gynocentrism.

[MonkeyMindParticipant 5340]

She’s probably one of the few feminists that can pull the whole movement out of it’s fog of retardnesness.

Unfortunatly, most feminists don’t live in the real world and instead prefer to ride a wave of their ‘feelz’ and hatred towards men.

[Mr. SpockParticipant 10924]

Yes she is just another filthy mule pretending to be a unicorn. Let’s not forget that women are hard wired to manipulate and lie for their survival. She will say or do anything to lead a few purple pillers back to the slaughterhouse.

Feminism isn't about equality with men, it's about leverage over men.

[UntamedParticipant]

Mr. Spock wrote:

Yes she is just another filthy mule pretending to be a unicorn. Let’s not forget that women are hard wired to manipulate and lie for their survival. She will say or do anything to lead a few purple pillers back to the slaughterhouse.

It’s fascinating to see desperate men seeking for a weemin’s sympathetic ear fall for the bulls~~~ that come out of this weemin’s piehole. We still have MGTOW Men grasping at straws wanting to believe that somehow, somewhere some bitch will be different than ALL the others.
We hear it all the time from deluded simps or Purple-Pillers who fall for their girlfriend’s manipulations and are about ready to marry any C~~~ who gives them any kind of validation as a Man.

If it has a c~~~ you cannot trust it! I can, in no way, be clearer than this!

Don't let them Blame, Shame or Tame you!
Give 'em NOTHING, not even an answer!
#GenderSegragationNow!

[NewgroundsParticipant 558]

Of course she is going to have biases when it comes to her talks about women, I don’t always agree with her but her work on statistics that disprove feminist myths about the wage gap are very helpful when it comes to basing arguments on these ridiculous claims of the “patriarchy”.

|Right Wing Death Squad| Swallowed both Red Pills /pol/MGTOW

[Author]

Posts