Is Bachelor Tax looming in the future?

[Morning_Star_MGTOWSpectator 72]

We saw it in Rome but is it possible in the West? There has been several attempts in the west to impose a bachelor tax for example:

In the United States: By 1821, the state of Missouri applied a $1 tax on all unmarried men.[12] The state of Michigan had made repeated attempts to instantiate a bachelor tax. In 1837, state senator Edward D. Ellis attempted to pass such a bill, but the measure failed. In 1848, a petition made it to a House committee, but did not reach the floor. In 1849, another proposal was made in a House committee that did not reach the floor. Again in 1850, another petition reached the House, but did not find a sponsor. During the civil war it was proposed again, this time as a revenue measure as opposed to a public welfare measure, but again failed to reach the floor. It was then repeatedly brought up in 1897, 1901, 1911, 1919, with the first resulting in counter proposals for a similar tax to be applied to women who reject marriage proposals and the final resulting in arguments that bachelors had a statistically higher rate of delinquency as opposed to other groups. The final proposed bill that also made the floor of the Michigan congress was in 1935 before it too failed due to economic considerations of the time.[5] On February 12, 1898, Assemblyman Waller of the New Jersey state legislature proposed a bachelor tax as a sumptuary tax; however, the bill was not passed.[6]In 1921, the state of Montana applied a $3 tax on all bachelors in the state.[13] One of them, William Atzinger, refused to pay on sex discrimination grounds.[14] On January 11, 1922, the state supreme court struck down the “bachelor tax” and another poll tax applicable only to men.[15][16] However, it was done so on the grounds that the Montanan constitution of 1889 did not grant the legislature the power to tax individual persons; and attempts to define it as a policing measure for matters of public health as opposed to a revenue measure were found invalid.[13]In the state of California in 1934, as a response to the low 1933 birth rate in California, minister of Finance Roland Vandegrift proposed a $5 to $25 bachelor tax, but the measure did not succeed.[17]

There were also attempts in other places like Romania, Germany, Poland, and Italy but all these attempts failed.

I believe that due to the Rise of MGTOW and the numerous women complaining about men not marrying such a thing will eventually become reality. Of course due to gender equality, there will be no such “bachelorette” tax will most likely be imposed only on men because…reasons.

But if a bachelor tax was ever imposed do you think it would be possible for a man to protect himself from such a thing in a gynocentric society and if so how?

Bachelor Tax History: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bachelor_tax

[uchibenkeiParticipant 7965]

marry your best male friend or another mgtow. problem solved. i don’t think it will happen, not until the majority of lawmakers are women anyway.

I bathe in the tears of single moms.

[Silverstone the SecondParticipant]

If they want to pass a bachelor tax I’d say they should pass one for women too. Of course, this wouldn’t happen because single women can do no wrong. If they do try to pass it, stop that s~~~ or move out of the country.

Which side of the fence do you think it would come from?

Feminism is a movement where opinions are presented as facts and emotions are presented as evidence.

[Anonymous 11]

Yes, gay marriage will make a bachelor tax moot. No gay sex, an open marriage, and tax free. I’d still rather not be married though.

These stupid libtards shoot themselves and everyone else in the foot with every single one of their poorly thought out hair brained social engineering schemes.

A bachelor tax is possible but easily evaded via sham gay marriages.

[Anonymous 0]

Morning_Star_MGTOW wrote:

But if a bachelor tax was ever imposed do you think it would be possible for a man to protect himself from such a thing in a gynocentric society and if so how?

Bachelor Tax History: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bachelor_tax

Perhaps rephrasing your question would be better accepted. Try this:
If a bachelorette tax was ever imposed do you think it would be possible for a woman to protect herself from such a thing in a gynocentric society and if so how?

Because you are new, I will offer you a chance to explain your intent and wait and watch your subsequent posts. Being a new member and asking loaded questions like that could easily be seen as a woman trying to get the men around here in to say something to support her feminist agenda.

[Morning_Star_MGTOWSpectator 72]

I’m not new to MGTOW pal, I have read about MGTOW and been to MGTOW forums like on reddit before and have watched numerous videos about MGTOW for about a year now, I have also been a avid reader on this site for a couple of months before finally making a account.

I don’t see how reversing the genders changes anything. Do you even know what gynocentrism means? How does reversing the gender on this question change anything because we all know that’s never going to happen.

How does this question even remotely make me seem like a feminist trying to get someone to support a feminist agenda? I assume you’re one of those people who can’t come up with interesting topics to discuss on your own, so you just run around accusing everyone of being a feminist to stroke your ego and pretend you’re actually doing something here.

I was scrolling through the internet where I learned about a bachelor tax in Rome so I decided to do some research on it and due to my research I decided to ask a question about it, some of us actually read to come up with interesting discussions instead of just accusing everyone of being a woman, we actually want to gain the opinions of other MGTOWs and learn something new.

[Nathan R. JessepParticipant 1102]

Morning_Star_MGTOW wrote:

I’m not new to MGTOW pal, I have read about MGTOW and been to MGTOW forums like on reddit before and have watched numerous videos about MGTOW for about a year now, I have also been a avid reader on this site for a couple of months before finally making a account.

I don’t see how reversing the genders changes anything. Do you even know what gynocentrism means? How does reversing the gender on this question change anything because we all know that’s never going to happen.

How does this question even remotely make me seem like a feminist trying to get someone to support a feminist agenda? I assume you’re one of those people who can’t come up with interesting topics to discuss on your own, so you just run around accusing everyone of being a feminist to stroke your ego and pretend you’re actually doing something here.

I was scrolling through the internet where I learned about a bachelor tax in Rome so I decided to do some research on it and due to my research I decided to ask a question about it, some of us actually read to come up with interesting discussions instead of just accusing everyone of being a woman, we actually want to gain the opinions of other MGTOWs and learn something new.

Some are very paranoid about tuna around here. I get it to a degree, but it drags the place down with insinuations like this that are baseless.

[Morning_Star_MGTOWSpectator 72]

“Some are very paranoid about tuna around here. I get it to a degree, but it drags the place down with insinuations like this that are baseless.”

Are you talking about me or the other guy?

[MonkeyMindParticipant 5340]

A Bachelor Tax would freeze just more men out of the dating market.

Women won’t date a man on an equal or lower wage, they want a higher earner. Imagine living in a society where a man earns less than a woman for the same job. The male female SMV would be so lopsided that we’d be looking at a systematic social collapse both finacially and via declining birth rates.

Sure, the men at the top will financially well off enough to breed. Everyone else will be screwed.

That’s if the country doesn’t decend into a civil war first.

[Morning_Star_MGTOWSpectator 72]

I always wondered how a war would affect the current sexes dynamic that is occurring at this moment? If you look through history, you will notice that all feminist activity would suddenly cease when a war occurred. Turd Flinging Monkey touche don it in his video “the magic of male scarcity”.

Also, if men stopped working as much so women started earning more, women wouldn’t pick up the slack, women would just start working less also. If you look at the charts, you will see that as the labor force participation for men goes down, it also goes down for women. Women only follow what men do, so if men started working less, women would just start working less, this is why the wage gap exists, because women will always choose to do less than what men do.

[AttonParticipant]

Some laws are illegal because of the constitution, in other places in the world outright refusal would work best.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[the roadParticipant 3125]

I would steal back my money from the government indirectly. There are ways.

#MANOUT

[$$$Crenshaw1118Participant 516]

As a single man with no kids, I feel that there already is such a tax. F~~~ I pay in $20,000 in taxes. And at income tax time I’m lucky to get a couple hundred back. Then I see f~~~ing women with 5 kids that work long enough to get a a w-2 get like $5000 back with the earned income credit. I still believe that someone collecting welfare and doing a income tax return, they should have to claim the welfare as a earn income for the year. It’s just f~~~ed up how this f~~~ing government works

[Freeman_KParticipant 3524]

Bachelor tax is already here across all Europe more or less only that it is not called bachelor tax. Effective tax rate is easily +50% and then state redistributes this to yes, mostly females.

Thus term bureaugamy; marriage to the state, explaines situation very good. Massive states are a direct attack on a man as a traditional provider and threat to the personal freedom.

The choices we make, not the chances we take, determine our destiny

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Sincerely, there was some very heated objections to the possibility of a “bachelor tax” which I read in a newspaper …. printed in 1890. Not kidding. They have threatened men with this for at least 130 years.

So smile. Because NO amount of bachelor tax will ever be more costly than a wife, and if THAT’s is the best way they can incentivize men to shackle themselves to some aging, nagging, perpetually miserable harpie……. then you have to start laughing.

A “bachelor tax” is everyone finally realizing there is – and never was – any good reason for a man to marry in the first place. If there were, someone would be able to present you with a POSITIVE incentive.

And there isn’t one.

Not a single one.

The concept of bachelor tax is like the classic fear tactic the church uses. Embrace Jesus and open your wallet or you’re going to hell. A woman uses the same kind of fear tactic when she says “marry me or you’re going to die alone”. They can’t get any sensible (or reasonable) man to take part, so the threaten you with a non-incentive.

It’s actually women who need to worry about it more than any man does.

WOMEN will pay in the end for being totally unmarriagable and impossible to live with. A piddly bachelor tax is nothing in the grand scheme of things and STILL doesn’t solve the problem.

That’s why there hasn’t been a bachelor tax and never will be. Because if unmarried men will pay it, then ANYTHING is better than a wife.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

I call for a tampon tax!
It will never be a tax, it will be a tax break.
Like using a store card “look how much you saved” bulls~~~ look how much you would have overcharged me for not using your data mining tool.
So single moms will get tax breaks on taxes raised for everyone, cough, cough. It’s a f~~~ing shell game.

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[Anonymous 3]

There is already a covert tax as others pointed out and as people always point out when this comes up.

They won’t bother with an overt tax because it’s pointless and there is no benefit to them.

Also, the government cares more about money than anything else. They also have been rigging employment so that females have higher income and more job security for ages, such that now young women significantly out-earn young men, this despite women being lazy and not wanting to work most of the time.

If they’re going to tax someone, it will be women. The alternative is roll back all the female empowerment nonsense that they have now, but there is no way they’re going to do that.

If population becomes a real issue, which is the only reason they’d want to put a bachelor tax in the first place, they’ll mostly focus on young fertile women. They’ll lower the age of consent/marriage and just hand women more free money without asking them to go to school or work. That’s how they keep birth rates so high among the poorer classes. They also just bring in minorities, who will breed in poverty, and just give them a few sheckels in welfare.

Responsible middle class Americans generally don’t have kids because said people understand how limited opportunity is these days and don’t want their kids to struggle. So the middle class is just being wiped out. The rich can always afford children, the poor are too selfish to care and are happy to assign their children to lifelong poverty.

Middle class men and women really don’t matter. Heck, worst case scenario, if they DID want to take advantage of the middle class women, they’d just legalize polygyny again and the richer men would have 10 wives each. That would absorb out all the working middle class women, although most are infertile due to age and STDs.

[Anonymous 43]

someday, the men of this world will say enough of this s~~~. and stop. stop going to work, stop going home to bitchy c~~~s, stop paying for children they never see. just stop and see the world we have created, a world of misery. The men will mull this over for a day, and then go his own way. I am waiting for this day. I may never see it in my life time. But someday, thanks to restrictive laws, men will figure it all out and fight back.

Every time I reject a woman, I win a small part of that battle. Any time I do something without women, I win.

our society needs a massive reset. it needs to start with removing the no fault divorce, mandatory alimony and child support. Take these three things away, and women can no longer destroy men. feminazis want equality, fine then be equal. you get the same chance in life as I do. the bitch I divorced makes 5X what I make. why should I pay 20% of my gross pay to that c~~~? $654 a month to someone who makes $17,000 a month? what the actual f~~~? I pay $7500 a year…she makes this in 2 weeks. after all bills expenses and deduction, I have about $50 left over. f~~~. $7500 to someone making $40K is a killer.

I want a law outlawing land whales. women over 150 pounds, lock them up. or tax the s~~~ out of them.

[MrMeParticipant 651]

After my University physical therapy class, im gonna get taxed over 50% of my salary. I already will be fully taxed. No other amount of tax will make it worst than that.

I will work minimum hours, as few as possible. Just enough hours to pay for my house and food and activities… I want to be in the lowest tax bracket possible.

Better be taxed than to be married. Less expensive.

[Veritech AceParticipant 699]

Dude Wake UP! There already is a bachelor tax in America. It’s why single there is one tax table for single people and another for married people, and of course the single person tax rate is higher.

[Author]

Posts