Is actual matriarchy possible?

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

My answer is: no.
Explanation:
Statistically, if we’re talking about anti-social and parasitical behaviours like not defending your country, consuming welfare, being supported by the opposite sex, not helping strangers, and killing your own children (both through infanticide and abortion – abortion is anti-social in the west due there aren’t enough children), women are undoubtedly worse than men: according all such stats women have a much greater disposition towards social parasitism than men.
Not all women are parasites, obviously, there are single women supporting themselves, but so many more women are parasites compared to men.
Furthermore women lack accountability, everybody knows that, it’s even enshrined in some laws and policies, especially in UK and Spain.
Based on such actions, conduct and behaviours men ARE the FUNCTIONING and PRODUCTIVE sex and it would be immensely harder to build a functioning society on the basis of women’s parasitical and anti-social attitudes.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[JustAnotherGuyParticipant]

Women don’t understand hierarchies, division and specialization of labor, delayed gratification. Any matriarchy will dissolve into mud hut s~~~ holes and abject poverty within a generation. We call it “Bonobo Protocol.”

Cupcakes are Cold. MGTOW is Absolute Zero.
“Let us wait a little; when your enemy is executing a false movement, never interrupt him” –Napoleon Bonaparte, 1805

[Joey AlfioParticipant]

Is actual matriarchy possibly you say? I just have to browse through history to answer HELL NO!

Δεν υπάρχει τίποτε αδύνατο γι’ αυτόν που θα προσπαθήσει. - Μέγας Αλέξανδρος

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

JustAnotherGuy wrote:

Women don’t understand hierarchies, division and specialization of labor, delayed gratification. Any matriarchy will dissolve into mud hut s~~~ holes and abject poverty within a generation. We call it “Bonobo Protocol.”

Bonobo vs chimp. Nailed it.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[Solo MAN’S WisdomParticipant]

Check out JD Unwin’s book, “Sex and Culture” in which he outlines no less than 80 cultures / societies that were patriarchal in their inception and ascendency then became matriarchal near their apex and during their inevitable decline and destruction.

When women lead, destruction is the destination. -- Me.

[MACHOParticipant]

I usually don’t answer when someone keeps on bombarding me with questions but this one has to be answered!

No Society has ever survived, existed for long when completely run by women…. so we’re on a path of self destruct! Women don’t know it yet but they are not building an ideal society they are an instrument of doom!

You must own a better Crystal ball than I

[SolidParticipant 7520]

I think that it is possible.
The same possible as those girls in two girls and one cup eating each other s~~~, it is possible, but it is disgusting and don’t accomplish anything.

If we start a matriarchy, in less than 5 years we will be in the same social development level that humans were 5000 BC.
Is possible, but is social, economical and cultural suicide to let it happen.

[Anonymous 42]

I guess jumping off a cliff and splattering on the rocks below is possible, so yes! A matriarchy is possible! Not only possible but happening all around us every day as they have their way!

I bailed on that train-wreck!

Now anything’s possible!

[narrow road travelerParticipant 1680]

No, women can’t physically dominate men. They require men to dominate other men by proxy. For any legislative clout.

The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting. --Sun Tsu

[Jim01Participant 6678]

LOL no!

just look at when companies have all female boards – they are all at each others throats within 5 minutes. Women HATE other women

[The man in the mountainParticipant 4102]

Through the years i have seen women mimic men more and more by advancing laws that position them in a position of authority, but with out any sense of responsibility and accountability.

Women are fighting to take our rights away, force us to marry them while taking all of our marriage and reproductive rights way, basically reversing patriarchy by reversing the roles that we once knew were the “norm”.

If men don’t start saying NO to these women and this system by phoning in your representatives and congressmen we might have a situation in our hands.

Women clearly want to have all the power and all of the say in gender relationships, they already do for the most part, most of the men like myself will tell you that we rather have children outside the United States because other countries are less feminist since they aren’t as rich like the west.

In other countries at least if you get divorced and have a kid you don’t lose everything, and you can pay the judge or the authorities to keep you off the hook with out bankrupting you entirely like we see here in this draconian system.

Make no mistake that moving forward if we let these parasites have their way they will solve every single problem on the backs of good hardworking men in our society and this s~~~ needs to STOP. If this trend were to continue we would’ve imploded as a modern economy by being on the same path as Europe, they are importing all those migrants in the hopes to get cheap labor out of them and taxes, but they are very mistaken in my opinion because having people that just want to leech off your goodies and not work will solve absolutely nothing.

[Anonymous 3]

It’s been tried many times and it’s always failed.

The worst example was Sparta, where boys were raised to be disposable bitches and the whole thing was held up as masculine toughness, and is still cited sometimes that way.

In truth, while the men were sent out to die, women ruled everything. They relied on slaves to do all the work.

Eventually the slaves rebelled, the men even when called back from war and mocked lost interest in propping these women up only to be sent right back out to war anyway, and Sparta just died.

The gynocracy does not like for this to be known, so they instead make stupid movies like 300 and yell THIS IS SPARTA!!! to condition more male slaves into their duty. Of course that will fail too as said men get older and see all of this.

There have been countless writers from various eras that mention feminism and a matriarchy. It really is not new, it’s apparently an eternal struggle. All societies build up and then privilege women, and then collapse. You are going to see it happen in the West too.

There is literally nothing impressive about the West. Technology exists in every era. There is nothing superior about this form of government or the economic systems or anything else. It’s all been done before many times. No generation is more special and more intelligent, no race is better. It’s all just stupid propaganda. And most people get suckered into it.

In the end it’s just the same old stuff all the time, men, women, sex, food, shelter, banking games, transportation, borders, taxes, death.

[Branched offParticipant 10941]

It is one of those things that depends on definition.

A matriarchy is a world in which mothers rule. A patriarchy is a world in which fathers rule. Now unless one is the ill begotton son of a liberal mangina, any man must know that fathers and mothers do things differently. Rule by women is not the same as rule by men with the pronouns changed.

Men respect each other and their leaders. Men accept responsibility an plan for the future. Men get stuff done. These will be traits of a patriarchy. Women take care of their children, women bitch a great deal but hate being bitched about and want to ban anyone from bitching about them. Women fear loss more than they love opportunity.

One set of traits favour a robust ascendant society, the other favour a prosperous society that is inwardly divided and which is becoming protectionist, over regulated and where the strong are feared and the weak lifted above their capacity to ensure the strong are kept in check.

Can matriarchy exist -yes we are living under one. Women wield power differently and by proxy. If it is a dirty job they get a man to do it for them and say it was his idea.

Can a matriarchy rule like a patriarchy -hell no. If a matriarchy could do what a patriarchy can do, there would have been no need through history for patriarchies.

A woman is like fire -fun to play with, can warm you through and cook your food, needs constant feeding, can burn you and consume all you own

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Eric Lauder wrote:

Is actual matriarchy possible?

It depends on the scope of what you mean when you say “matriarchy”.

Simple matriarchy is very possible. I can show you millions of examples because every single single-mother family is a matriarchy. Note, however, that these families are not self sustaining, but require outside material support to function. Which explains a lot when you try to apply matriarchy to a wider scope.

Now if you’re talking about a matriarchal society, then the answer is obviously no, because matriarchy and society are mutually exclusive things. Saying “matriarchal society” is like saying “socialist market”. This is because matriarchies exist to serve the needs of the matriarchs alone, which is inherently anti-social. This is why no matriarchal population ever advances even to a tribal level of sophistication. They always remain stuck st the familial level and go no higher.

And as to matriarchal civilization: LOL. No. Just no.

[MonkParticipant 16996]

A true matriarchy is impossible. Women are simply too stupid and too driven by feelz for the result to be anything but chaos and collapse.

[Anonymous 1]

Its possible only with a welfare state. They must have “re-distribution of wealth” to support the Matriarchy.

Detroit was a Matriarchy for the most part. Welfare Queens rule. There are no shortage of Momma’s boys (Thugs) who will pick up a gun and kill for her.

[DorkShitParticipant 4353]

It is possible. But, so is wrecking your car.

The day that women got the vote was the day that we began the slide.

Peace brothers

[iMickey503Participant 12465]

Yea, in VIDEO GAMES!

But I don’t like to play Make Believe.

You are all alone. If you have been falsely accused of RAPE, DV, PLEASE let all men know about the people who did this. http://register-her.net/web/guest/home

[CarnageParticipant 22113]

Mehhh.

To those following me, be careful, I just farted. Men those beans are killers.

[Anonymous 3]

DorkShit wrote:

The day that women got the vote was the day that we began the slide.

I think the problem began before that. The day the average man got a vote was when society was doomed.

Average men fought and died for the vote, and then as soon as they got it, they immediately wanted women to have a vote and gain authority.

Blue pill men always existed and have always sought to submit to women. This is not new, Aristotle wrote about this thousands of years ago.

Only a high quality man is fit to lead, and that is an extreme minority of men. Only land owning tax payers could initially vote, and I suspect women had a strong voice back then too and maybe some voted as well. It’s just even less women are capable of contributing to society, so it may have been very few, same as we see now.

When every schmuck male could vote they demanded women are equal. The average woman is in fact smarter than the average man. MGTOW only have an issue because for the most part we are above average men. This is also why women are obsessed with MGTOW and always scream where are all the good men.

It was one thing when average women were forced to listen to superior men, and in that way kept average men in line. It’s another when superior men are forced to submit to average women, and women have zero guidance whatsoever. THAT is the reason the West is in decline. There will never be a time stupid men don’t submit to women, but when women are the conduit of superior men’s message it’s not really that bad.

Laws controlling men only affect superior men, because inferior men already willingly submit to women. All that happens now is superior men can’t lead and the inferior men are busy enforcing that female privilege, where in the past they had to mind their own business and could submit to women in their own home, but not demand another man submits to a woman in public.

[Author]

Posts