IN Defense of Incels

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Gravel Pit wrote:

Women’s Sexual Marketplace Value (SMV) has been overbought. It’s highly inflated beyond its value. It’s been increasing without just cause for decades.

It’s not women SMV who was raised, it was men SMV who was dropped.
Men SMV is even (perhaps even mainly) based on being able to provide support and protection, more and more women are now capable to support themselves, there’s law and order and low crime rate compared to the past, standard of living is greatly improved everywhere compared to let’s say 100 years ago.
That’s why it affects all men, even the top 0.001% men, globally.
How many harems are left in the world? Just think about it for a moment.

Gravel Pit wrote:

Women are acting like their pussies have royal connections

They’re acting more or less as usual, female nature doesn’t change through time and space.

Gravel Pit wrote:

, and that all of them deserve a $100,000 a year Stud-muffin

Their instinct tell them they need that for reproducing. Basically, in a certain way, they actually deserve it.
On the other hand it could be argued that women’s instincts haven’t adapted to the new environment.

That’s why third world poor countries are still producing a lot of children, while ALL developed countries are in demographical crisis, regardless their culture: Japan, Russia, China, USA, Spain, Sweden – they’re very different but they’re all aging.

Restoring “patriarchy” is conceptually easy, even if actually impossible to do:
You invent a new kind of job, giving an average wage of 300,000 $ year, and no less than 100,000 $ a year at the entry level, 30,000,000 of such jobs in USA, such job is particularly suited for men and not good for women due biological reasons.
Done.
You just restored “patriarchy”.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Gravel PitParticipant]

Eric Lauder wrote:

It’s not women SMV who was raised, it was men SMV who was dropped.

I usually don’t talk to you because it’s clear English isn’t your first language and I have a hard time interpreting what you’re trying to say. Plus, your signature makes no sense to me.

I don’t really know what to think of you but I suppose you mean well. There are many people here from around the world, with different backgrounds and cultures. So that is great.

I hear what you’re saying. There’s an expression here, ‘six one way, half a dozen the other.’ Basically meaning, same difference. Same result.

It can be argued both ways. Women’s SMV increased merely by indoctrinating them with feminist memes about ‘not needing a man,’ ‘female equality.’ ‘female rights to choose birth or abortion.’ They empowered women. This power went to their heads. They no longer settled for men in their own peer group and certainly wouldn’t settle for men below their peer level. No, they demand a higher standard of man merely out of their own artificially inflated self worth.

On the other hand, men’s SMV certainly did decrease as you pointed out. Men regularly fuel the c~~~ carousel. Women do not turn themselves into whores all by themselves, they require a steady flow of philanderers. These philanderer men have no self respect. They gladly take the sex, a temporary recreational joy that they believe is harmless. But in reality, they just confirm that men are easy. <- the very essence of low SMV ‘men are easy.’ When you have enough Chads and PUAs out there actively fueling the c~~~ carousel, male SMV plummets. We see this everyday, when 40 year old men picking up 22 year old girls. These men have zero intention of creating lasting relationships with these girls and the girls are merely looking for validation, sexual experience and gifts.

This is deep sociology. The moral failings of society. All is connected. The MRA’s would have us believe that a return to traditional values would set us straight. Negative. The church and it’s celestial dictator never gave anyone logical reasons to behave other than “God said so” and “You’ll burn in hell!” It’s no wonder that little more than an industrial age catapulted women into rebellion and sexual liberation when moral thought was stuck in the bronze age texts.

[Gravel PitParticipant]

If you didn’t understand my post, I’m agreeing with you Eric. 🙂

Have a good day. 🙂 I’m shutting down for the night here. 12:42am in Texas.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

The first part of my signature is just only a silly joke, I’m not from North Korea and the phone number contains even the number of fools’ gold or something like that. It’s meant to mislead casual lurkers about my actual location.

I have a somewhat feminist education, due a gender studies class (optional course, not my actual degree) in Lund, Sweden.
I took the course mainly because I thought it was a good way to have threesomes with bisexual women: I was wrong.

Your explanation was wrong in some parts: you said

Women’s Sexual Marketplace Value (SMV) has been overbought. It’s highly inflated beyond its value. It’s been increasing without just cause for decades.

Nothing happen without a reason.

Moral decadence cannot explain why it’s happening in a places like Japan: no c~~~ carousel there, most girls just stay virgins rather than dating Japanese boys.
Explanation being that they need more for actually feeling that they can reproduce.
Women’s sexuality isn’t complicated, it’s actually at least as primitive than our, very likely even more primitive, but it could be confusing because it’s both weaker and tend to fluctuate much more, it’s more environmentally driven.

The more a society becomes wealth and safe, the more the women gain power and close the wealth gap with men, the less actual sex happen: even the sexual revolution gave more promiscuity, more partners, but LESS actual intercourses, the number of intercourses dropped.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Gravel PitParticipant]

Eric Lauder wrote:

I took the course mainly because I thought it was a good way to have threesomes with bisexual women: I was wrong.

LOL. I’m one credit away from a 2 year degree. I do not go back because all the teachers are insane and the students are retarded. Besides, I have no intention of following through with a 4 year degree because today’s universities are dangerous s~~~holes that will put you in debt for life. I make enough money to get by.

Eric Lauder wrote:

Moral decadence cannot explain why it’s happening in a places like Japan:

I agree, the are many causes besides moral failure. Politics and technology in many forms are also to blame.

Eric Lauder wrote:

The more a society becomes wealthy and safe, the more the women gain power and close the wealth gap with men, the less sex happens

Right, you give women voting, birth control and no-fault divorce, why would they want to be mothers anymore? They are now effectively men.

In my opinion women are no longer suitable to control the reproduction of this species. I could gone on at length on that topic alone but its more of a speculative discussion about 200 years in the future.

[JackinovParticipant 5229]

Gravel Pit wrote:

Many of you seem to not understand basic MGTOW ground that was covered years ago. You don’t read the thread, you don’t bother to understand what people are saying, and then you make retarded comments confirming you don’t bother to read or understand.

Yeah we understand it. Incels created this word for themselves. Them being blue pill simps perpetually stuck in the mode of pussy worship and self deprecation with the idea of “romance” floating around in their heads is pretty much their only hurdle, but mentally it is a hurdle not too many of them come to realize they can cross.

are you a chia pet in man drag

[Author]

Posts