In Canada Emails of Consent Soon to Be In-admissible in Court

[Puffin StuffParticipant 25002]

There is a bill winding it’s way through the Canadian Parliment that would make it illegal to admit emails that confirm consent for sex unless a judge deems them relevant and the woman’s attorney agrees.

Innocence until proven guilty is being thrown out the door in exchange for believing a woman no matter what.

Here’s an excellent article about it from Barbera Kaye.

Barbara Kay: Canada’s new sexual assault law is a ‘catastrophic attack’ on the rights of the accused

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

A few more bills like that the men will vote in Sharia law because it’s fairer and makes more sense than Canadian law.

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[Anonymous 25]

make a woman have to beg for sex in front of all your friends

they deserve no better

[Anonymous 0]

You should always have a licensed notary with you and a stack of consent forms on every date.

[Puffin StuffParticipant 25002]

If the forms are admissible. If a text isn’t and email isn’t then why would a piece of paper be admissible?

It proves one thing. When evidence is presented women are shown to be liars and that’s why women want suppression of evidence. The evidence sinks these lying perjerous skanks.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[Anonymous 25]

We need new sexual consent class for women. Otherwise, they can become leftovers with frozen eggs that no man wants

Time to pass a law saying a woman has to get a man’s consent to sex like this so it’s clear he’s not raping her:

[Anonymous 13]

Reason #89,768,678 to stay the f~~~ away from these falsely accusing lying monsters fully backed by a corrupt state and court system.

This is an all out war on men.

End it.

Walk the f~~~ away FOREVER.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22584]

FrostByte wrote:

A few more bills like that the men will vote in Sharia law because it’s fairer and makes more sense than Canadian law.

That is likely what the globalists want, but the globalists do not realize if that happens they will be the ones on the outside of Sharia law.

[Puffin StuffParticipant 25002]

Anonymous wrote:

This is an all out war on men.

Yes it is.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[Anonymous 13]

Puffin Stuff wrote:

MATRIX wrote:

This is an all out war on men.

Yes it is.

This s~~~ is getting worse and FAST.

SOMETHING BAD IS COMING.

Soon a woman will be able to shoot a man dead on the street.

I didn’t feel safe, he looked at me strangely.

Ah but the cctv shows he was no threat so snowflake can be proved to have murdered him.

Oh no, can’t have that.

The evidence of a man’s innocence is inadmissible in court.

WALK THE F~~~ AWAY NOW WHILE YOU ALL STILL CAN.

[GrumpyParticipant]

I will reiterate a certain law that always applies to everything.

When one body exerts a force on a second body, the second body simultaneously exerts a force equal in magnitude and opposite in direction on the first body.

Ladies and mangina’s, be careful what you wish for.
You may just get it as well as the consequences and they wont be pleasant.

There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it

[narwhalParticipant]

Playing devil’s advocate a little bit here, I can somewhat agree with this in terms of communications before the act of sex. By that I mean to say that a person could consent to sex in email at a point in time, then revoke consent at a later point in time. Whatever is said before consent is revoked very well could be irrelevant.

That said however, shouldn’t that be for the judge or jury to decide, and for the prosecute to convince that it’s irrelevant?

Communications after sex should be very important. Obviously, if communications shows that the woman has no regrets, then it would be difficult to prove sex wasn’t consensual. Of course, even regret doesn’t prove anything since a man is not responsible for a woman’s regret of a bad decision. Really, the only communications that should matter is a woman states that she never gave consent and the man acknowledge that to be true.

But again, why isn’t it up to the judge/jury to decide what’s important?

Really, the bigger problem is that the mindset has switch on guilty till proven innocent. I have no problem with women being concerned that rape victims aren’t believed. It can be very difficult to prove that rape occurred. The response shouldn’t be limit the rights of a man, but for women to look out for their own security.

Restricting a woman’s freedom from doing whatever she wants, even if it’s for her own safety, is against what feminism stands for though. Hence, the opt to remove the rights of men instead.

Ok. Then do it.

[UntamedParticipant]

Puffin Stuff wrote:

Innocence until proven guilty is being thrown out the door

It’s been out the door for quite some time; anyone who was falsely accused of anything – but more specifically for a sexual offence – was guilty before proven innocent, me included.
It’s all a ploy to incarcerate as many Men as they can to take away their votes. It has nothing to do with consent or guilt or anything besides f~~~ing Men over in favor of “empowering” weemins.

All these internet and newspaper articles that pretend that the laws passed take into consideration either guilt or innocence are either full of s~~~ or deliberately mislead the public at large in order to portray a reality that, in fact, doesn’t exists or only apply to a certain segment of the population, namely weemins.

But let’s also pretend for a minute that Consent is the crux of the matter here. In any other world, a sane one, consent is given by the time she takes her clothes off. But now, even if she wrote the consent it won’t be accepted in Court ?!
So we come again full circle. The ONLY thing that will protect a Man from false accusation is to not put himself in such a situation where he can be dragged in front of the judge to be gang-raped by lawyers and prosecutors under the express approval of the judge.
The ONLY thing that will completely protect a Man is to go MGTOW.
It’s the ONLY way, and that’s a FACT.

Don't let them Blame, Shame or Tame you!
Give 'em NOTHING, not even an answer!
#GenderSegragationNow!

[Old RottweilerParticipant 1520]

Women can accuse you of assault or rape with no evidence and you will be arrested. Even if the charges are later dropped, your record will show you were arrested.

When an employer or anyone later asked why you were arrested, you will say for assault, but the charges were dropped. Sorry, it was really close between you and the other candidate, but you lost, the other, possibly a woman, was better suited.

The only way to win is to not play.

It’s not ” there are no good men”. it’s there are far less stupid men to play a rigged game.

[Mr. SpockParticipant 10924]

I wonder how long it will be before audio and video evidence will be only admissible by the judge?
Next time women want to know where all the good men are, they should be told to fill out some forms and then we can say that the forms are inadmissible.

Feminism isn't about equality with men, it's about leverage over men.

[GnosticParticipant 2491]

Well, this will end up in no men caring about rape and employer don’t care about hiring rapist. Or men decide the death penalty is worth it.

There is no magic in MGTOW, just recognition of the truth and logical decision how to avoid dangers. The red pill is but the truth, it is no magical potion. Do not think in this modern world men have no longer have natural enemies, men are prey to women and government.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12044]

I don’t see what’s the matter.
Never heard of a fleshlight or a blowjob machine accusing a man.
Guys should have some experiences with girls, but then, in actual society, the idea of keep pursuing women when you hit 30 it’s simply too dumb: in other words, my suggestion to young men is to f~~~ enough women to become aware that they aren’t better than a fleshlight or a blowjob machine, then going full monk. 3 women would suffice, 4 is better, 5 is probably the very best, 6 is already a waste of time – ideally you have to “conquer” them, they shouldn’t be escorts. Then: you’ll be an happy monk, because you’ll be aware what you are really missing (basically: nothing, there are some disadvantages but even more advantages in using artificial means compared to the real thing).

Women cannot consent to sex with men. Period.
Women cannot even consent to sex with women, but such case doesn’t matter because women cannot be perpetrators.
When there will be a woman accusing a male dog or another male animal of rape, then we could discuss about consent.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

The emails/ texts is how jian ghomeshi beat his false rape charges.

That can’t be allowed to happen again.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[Puffin StuffParticipant 25002]

Evidence is kryptonite to our feminist sisters.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[AutoliteParticipant]

It more feminist backlash from the Jian Ghomeshi case. Ghomeshi beat a sexual assault charge because he saved emails from his alleged victim that proved his innocence. We can’t afford men any means or ways for them to show that they are innocent now can we???

[Author]

Posts