If Women Really Make 77 Cents On The Dollar…

[FunInTheSunParticipant 8286]

…compared to men, wouldn’t it make sense for businesses to hire mostly women so they can save money on labor costs? If you own a construction company, why spend $100,000 a year on labor costs for male workers when you can spend $77,000? I’m sure you’ve heard that women can do anything a man can do. So give them some tool belts and put them to work on that office building you drafted. You can buy yourself some nice gifts with the money you save. Any thoughts, guys?

"I saw that there comes a point, in the defeat of any man of virtue, when his own consent is needed for evil to win-and that no manner of injury done to him by others can succeed if he chooses to withhold his consent. I saw that I could put an end to your outrages by pronouncing a single word in my mind. I pronounced it. The word was ‘No.’" (Atlas Shrugged)

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

I agree. Also, It is against the law to pay saomeone less based upon their gender.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[Mr. SpockParticipant 10920]

Well then women are breaking even because women do at most 77% of the work expected of a man. Between sickness, maternity leave and period leave they are probably at work at most 77% of the time.
They definitely have ways of making up that loss. Thanks to big daddy government they can make up the difference through alimony, palimony, and child support.

Feminism isn't about equality with men, it's about leverage over men.

[Author]

Posts