If women had no vagina.

[Silverstone the SecondParticipant]

I recently watched something by Patrice O’Neal where he asks women how they would keep men around if they didn’t have a vagina.

This is very interesting to me because women are always going on and on about how they’re objectified, and how they shouldn’t be viewed as sex objects yada yada, you all know. We’re supposed to like women for more than their bodies, but when asked the question, women replied with “anal sex” and “blowjobs”. Wow, so women don’t even think they should be loved for anything more than their bodies. Yep, a man is a disgusting pig if he likes a woman’s body. But women have NO other reason a man should stick around. SILENCE. Most women haven’t even given it thought, but they expect men to love them for something more than the physical body when women don’t even know of anything else for them to love. They’re meatholes and they know it, if some c~~~ ever says something along the lines of “stop objectifying me!” then pose this question to them. Clip below.

Feminism is a movement where opinions are presented as facts and emotions are presented as evidence.

[Anonymous 3]

They don’t actually hate being “objectified”. If you really want to p~~~ a woman off, just don’t look at her. They HATE being ignored. They go nuclear.

They want you to look because they live off their sexual currency. This is also why while women will all swear they are 7+s and they’re all hot and men are ugly, the second a genuine 9 or 10 pops in, and men’s attention goes to her, suddenly all the feminism and everything else goes out the window, and these women HATE her and start calling her a slut and attack her.

It’s actually funny, but that’s why 9s and 10s are kind of easy in a way, they’re often alone and struggle with female friends, and a lot of guys are intimidated and assume they stand no chance with her, so only the least self aware men constantly approach her and keep trying until she just accepts.

The beta orbiter thing is more common with the 7s and 8s, and they even have lesser females with them. For whatever reason lesser females don’t mind a 7, likely because with makeup virtually all women can reach 7. Anything over a 3 can easily up to a 7.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Silverstone the Second wrote:

I recently watched something by Patrice O’Neal where he asks women how they would keep men around if they didn’t have a vagina.

I recently heard someone else say….

“If women did NOT have a vagina, there would be a bounty on them”.

Silverstone the Second wrote:

This is very interesting to me because women are always going on and on about how they’re objectified, and how they shouldn’t be viewed as sex objects yada yada, you all know. We’re supposed to like women for more than their bodies,

Then perhaps women shouldn’t be flaunting the sex and shoving it in everyone’s face ….

/forums/topic/seriously-grossed-out/

…. and hammering the internet expecting to be worshipped for THEIR LOOKS:

https://www.buzzfeed.com/chrissymahlmeister/anything-but-average

Send those links to any female who wants you to notice her “personality” and “more than just her body”. Contained right there is everything you need to know about their “personalities”. If women really want to be appreciated for something other than their bodies , they definitely have their work cut out for them. The way they present themselves, nobody would believe it anyway.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[TaxGuyParticipant]

Keymaster wrote:

Silverstone the Second wrote:

I recently watched something by Patrice O’Neal where he asks women how they would keep men around if they didn’t have a vagina.

I recently heard someone else say….

“If women did NOT have a vagina, there would be a bounty on them”.

I’ve also heard the saying that women are only good for two things: f~~~ing and nothing. So, without the vagina, I guess they’d only be good for one thing.

Order the good wine

[Anonymous 2]

This just goes to show that women know they bring nothing to the table other than their pussy. Once they are out of their early 20s, it’s all downhill. Many will hit the wall before they even graduate college. Men are appreciating assets, since from the time we graduate college and get into our careers, we get a growing income through the years as we gain seniority at our jobs and move up the ranks. Women only go down in value. Their bodies hit the wall, and their value in the marketplace drops like a stone. Why would a man risk not only all of his current money and assets, but his future income as well, all for a depreciating asset?

[Anonymous 3]

Anonymous wrote:

This just goes to show that women know they bring nothing to the table other than their pussy. Once they are out of their early 20s, it’s all downhill. Many will hit the wall before they even graduate college. Men are appreciating assets, since from the time we graduate college and get into our careers, we get a growing income through the years as we gain seniority at our jobs and move up the ranks. Women only go down in value. Their bodies hit the wall, and their value in the marketplace drops like a stone. Why would a man risk not only all of his current money and assets, but his future income as well, all for a depreciating asset?

Young women out-earn young men now, and the only way it even gets close is because the more attractive women just take the mommy out and leave for years at a time. The less attractive women get the money and don’t ever leave, because men refuse to marry them. But women overreached, and now only the top 30% at best of women have the marriage option. 70% of young women are unmarried, and you can bet it’s certainly not the 9s and 10s who have trouble getting a marriage commitment out of a man.

[TorchemParticipant 453]

Keymaster wrote:

I recently heard someone else say….

“If women did NOT have a vagina, there would be a bounty on them”.

Similar to what I say the the younger men who are c~~~ struck. “If they didn’t have a vagina, they’ll be 10 deep at the rubbish tip.”

[TattooDaveParticipant 6952]

Anonymous wrote:

They don’t actually hate being “objectified”. If you really want to p~~~ a woman off, just don’t look at her. They HATE being ignored. They go nuclear.

They want you to look because they live off their sexual currency. This is also why while women will all swear they are 7+s and they’re all hot and men are ugly, the second a genuine 9 or 10 pops in, and men’s attention goes to her, suddenly all the feminism and everything else goes out the window, and these women HATE her and start calling her a slut and attack her.

It’s actually funny, but that’s why 9s and 10s are kind of easy in a way, they’re often alone and struggle with female friends, and a lot of guys are intimidated and assume they stand no chance with her, so only the least self aware men constantly approach her and keep trying until she just accepts.

The beta orbiter thing is more common with the 7s and 8s, and they even have lesser females with them. For whatever reason lesser females don’t mind a 7, likely because with makeup virtually all women can reach 7. Anything over a 3 can easily up to a 7.

Finally I hear someone say sexual currency. I have been searching for that term for the last 8 years period after I got divorced I met an heiress she was very hot blonde and she use that term I tried to forget her and I forgot the term too, man you just Jarred a memory loose. Someday I’m going to do a video on the heiress

I can see their heads have been twisted and fed with worthless foam from the mouth. Bob d

[Anonymous 42]

If they had no vagina you couldn’t carry them like a six pack!

[Cap285Participant 6007]

There would be bounties out on them.

Fuck this planet.

[KingOfTheSeaParticipant 1270]

In addition to what @phoenix said, it’s also about the fact they just want to be sexualized by a specific portion of the male population. If they had a guy who was alpha in every sense of the word, who got their motors running just by him looking at them, and he ignored them? Hell to pay.

All these policies and laws are measures to punish the foolish plebs who thought they could make a move. It’s a massive s~~~ test.

[Oz-BlokeParticipant 3233]

Sometimes I see an old retired couple who seem genuinely happy in each others company, even though it has become a sexless marriage through the natural ageing process (impotency, loss of libido).

That said, it’s becoming a rarer sight and the proverbial ‘needle in a haystack’ and not worth the risk to a man’s finances and mental well-being. Strangely, it’s an Australian tradition for retired boomers to go caravaning around the country and spend 24/7 in each other’s company. Each to their own, but not my idea of a ‘holiday’ –

#ManOut

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

I females couldn’t provide sex, we would have hunted them for food. 10k years ago.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[BeerParticipant 11832]

Oz-Bloke wrote:

Sometimes I see an old retired couple who seem genuinely happy in each others company, even though it has become a sexless marriage through the natural ageing process (impotency, loss of libido).

What really scared me out of marriage is I see more older couples like this than happy middle aged couples. Somewhere between my generation and my grandparents that are all 70+ now, something went very, very wrong, and I’m sure as hell not getting married lol.

Anonymous wrote:

They don’t actually hate being “objectified”. If you really want to p~~~ a woman off, just don’t look at her. They HATE being ignored. They go nuclear.

Its true…if they hated being objectified they’d be choosing to dress more conservatively. Its no different than a guy dressed all professionally looking in a suit and tie getting different looks and reactions from people than a guy dressed all thuggy. If you dress a certain way you attract a certain kind of attention, and dressing slutty in revealing clothes is obviously going to draw attention to your looks. Let’s be honest…how many attractive 20 something year olds do we see dressing up in a Hillary Clinton pantsuit when they go out because they want to look professional? None?

[HitmanParticipant]

if they had no vagina…
like that’s a f~~~ing prize.
petri dish
sewer
yeast factory
disease hole
…….uh, i’m good, thanks !!!

[Sky-OParticipant 18933]

If women didn’t have vaginas. . . . .

The world’s population would begin to decrease.

Important to note in case anyone forgot:

We all spent nine months inside a woman then fought our way out of a vagina.

We are MGTOW.

But our journeys started when a guy/dad was banging a vagina.

It’s the ultimate Catch 22.

[Anonymous 3]

Sky-O wrote:

We are MGTOW.

But our journeys started when a guy/dad was banging a vagina.

It’s the ultimate Catch 22.

Only if we are keen on this society surviving.

I see no catch 22. It would just be quiet… No more nagging.

[Anonymous 3]

Sky-O wrote:

If women didn’t have vaginas. . . . .

The world’s population would begin to decrease.

Important to note in case anyone forgot:

We all spent nine months inside a woman then fought our way out of a vagina.

We are MGTOW.

But our journeys started when a guy/dad was banging a vagina.

It’s the ultimate Catch 22.

And all women started out as their father’s sperm. What is your point?

[Anonymous 2]

With Fleshlights, sexdolls that look real and artifical wombs around the corner there will be alot of dried up vaginas in the future. Forgot to mention the rapid spreading and mutating stds. F~~~ that! Just not worth it. I cannot recall an intelligent conversation with a woman. No depth at all. I feel sorry for my child whos a girl. I hope I can make a good person out of her. So far so good. I just pray for it.

[Sky-OParticipant 18933]

Point is:

We all entered the world through a vagina after spending about nine months inside of a womb.

That’s just a fact.

People are not born as a result of anal sex. It would be physically impossible for a fetus to be born nine months later via a woman having a huge bowel movement.

[Author]

Posts