Home › Forums › Philosophy › If I read this correctly this is a woman's Irrationality.
Tagged: Friedrich Nietzsche
This topic contains 5 replies, has 4 voices, and was last updated by TheDigestedRedPill 4 years, 1 month ago.
- AuthorPosts
Since this is philosophy, Which I suck at in every attempt. While reading Friedrich Nietzsche’s Beyond Good and Evil I came across this. I am not sure if this really explain’s a woman’s thinking in its entirety, but here it is. Kill it if you will. Break it down. Destroy it and contradict the f~~~ out of this please. Prove me wrong.
“With regard to the superstitions of logicians, I shall never tire of emphasizing a small, terse fact, which is unwillingly recognized by these credulous minds–namely, that a thought comes when “it” wishes, and not when “I” wish; so that it is a PERVERSION of the facts of the case to say that the subject “I” is the condition of the predicate “think.” ONE thinks; but that this “one” is precisely the famous old “ego,” is, to put it mildly, only a supposition, an assertion, and assuredly not an “immediate certainty.” After all, one has even gone too far with this “one thinks”–even the “one” contains an INTERPRETATION of the process, and does not belong to the process itself. One infers here according to the usual grammatical formula–“To think is an activity; every activity requires an agency that is active; consequently” . . . It was pretty much on the same lines that the older atomism sought, besides the operating “power,” the material particle wherein it resides and out of which it operates–the atom. More rigorous minds, however, learnt at last to get along without this “earth-residuum,” and perhaps some day we shall accustom ourselves, even from the logician’s point of view, to get along without the little “one” (to which the worthy old “ego” has refined itself).” – Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche
Sidenote: Aren’t women in their nature superstitious and wildly inept the hypnotize men to believe in these superstitions. Is it not that women who use the ego as a trap for themselves and men. In turn using the letter “I” to describe control to manipulate men into doing things that they wish not to do. This hypnotization can be as Nietzsche says the manipulation of Language (by women).
Maybe I am f~~~ing dead wrong but its just a thought. Its very much a thought. With this also keep in mind that Nietzsche destroyed the concept of Free Will therefore women by their nature are more inclined to manipulate men. Not nag but manipulate men. I think society itself now has created the Nagging complex which probably wasn’t there before. Nagging in a sense is a product of Modern Society’s whoa’s Hence the need to have things now and to keep up with the times. I feel like also when presented with facts women get upset.Society live's as if we have reached the pinnacle of human potential. Technological Advancement and Innovation, intellectualism, critical thinking is substituted for useless innovations, nasty narcissistic games, tyrannical laws that destroy the very foundation of family, and the world as we know it.
Good quote. And it shows your skills in knowledge and research. Though, irrationality is a sign of emotional immaturity.
So its emotions that I went wrong on then.
Society live's as if we have reached the pinnacle of human potential. Technological Advancement and Innovation, intellectualism, critical thinking is substituted for useless innovations, nasty narcissistic games, tyrannical laws that destroy the very foundation of family, and the world as we know it.
I agree with ol’ Friedrich on this. In my own case, thoughts do come and go whether I want it or not. Neither pursuing one chain of thought nor suppressing another keeps new and different thoughts from arising.
Some scientist said there is an area in our brain that produces thoughts automatically. I think he’s right.
Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?
He seems to be attacking Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy, “I think, therefore I am”. In essence, continuing the work of Kierkegaard’s belief in the absurd, and laying the foundation for future existentialists such as Albert Camus and Jean-Paul Sartre. Women are like Bene Gesserit, and men are like Muad’Dib. Philosophy is the place men go that is terrifying to women, and where they cannot go.
He seems to be attacking Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy, “I think, therefore I am”. In essence, continuing the work of Kierkegaard’s belief in the absurd, and laying the foundation for future existentialists such as Albert Camus and Jean-Paul Sartre. Women are like Bene Gesserit, and men are like Muad’Dib. Philosophy is the place men go that is terrifying to women, and where they cannot go.
WINNING !!!!!!!!!
Society live's as if we have reached the pinnacle of human potential. Technological Advancement and Innovation, intellectualism, critical thinking is substituted for useless innovations, nasty narcissistic games, tyrannical laws that destroy the very foundation of family, and the world as we know it.
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678