If I read this correctly this is a woman's Irrationality.

[TheDigestedRedPillParticipant 165]

Since this is philosophy, Which I suck at in every attempt. While reading Friedrich Nietzsche’s Beyond Good and Evil I came across this. I am not sure if this really explain’s a woman’s thinking in its entirety, but here it is. Kill it if you will. Break it down. Destroy it and contradict the f~~~ out of this please. Prove me wrong.

“With regard to the superstitions of logicians, I shall never tire of emphasizing a small, terse fact, which is unwillingly recognized by these credulous minds–namely, that a thought comes when “it” wishes, and not when “I” wish; so that it is a PERVERSION of the facts of the case to say that the subject “I” is the condition of the predicate “think.” ONE thinks; but that this “one” is precisely the famous old “ego,” is, to put it mildly, only a supposition, an assertion, and assuredly not an “immediate certainty.” After all, one has even gone too far with this “one thinks”–even the “one” contains an INTERPRETATION of the process, and does not belong to the process itself. One infers here according to the usual grammatical formula–“To think is an activity; every activity requires an agency that is active; consequently” . . . It was pretty much on the same lines that the older atomism sought, besides the operating “power,” the material particle wherein it resides and out of which it operates–the atom. More rigorous minds, however, learnt at last to get along without this “earth-residuum,” and perhaps some day we shall accustom ourselves, even from the logician’s point of view, to get along without the little “one” (to which the worthy old “ego” has refined itself).” – Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche

Sidenote: Aren’t women in their nature superstitious and wildly inept the hypnotize men to believe in these superstitions. Is it not that women who use the ego as a trap for themselves and men. In turn using the letter “I” to describe control to manipulate men into doing things that they wish not to do. This hypnotization can be as Nietzsche says the manipulation of Language (by women).
Maybe I am f~~~ing dead wrong but its just a thought. Its very much a thought. With this also keep in mind that Nietzsche destroyed the concept of Free Will therefore women by their nature are more inclined to manipulate men. Not nag but manipulate men. I think society itself now has created the Nagging complex which probably wasn’t there before. Nagging in a sense is a product of Modern Society’s whoa’s Hence the need to have things now and to keep up with the times. I feel like also when presented with facts women get upset.

Society live's as if we have reached the pinnacle of human potential. Technological Advancement and Innovation, intellectualism, critical thinking is substituted for useless innovations, nasty narcissistic games, tyrannical laws that destroy the very foundation of family, and the world as we know it.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22521]

Good quote. And it shows your skills in knowledge and research. Though, irrationality is a sign of emotional immaturity.

[TheDigestedRedPillParticipant 165]

So its emotions that I went wrong on then.

Society live's as if we have reached the pinnacle of human potential. Technological Advancement and Innovation, intellectualism, critical thinking is substituted for useless innovations, nasty narcissistic games, tyrannical laws that destroy the very foundation of family, and the world as we know it.

[RoyDalParticipant]

I agree with ol’ Friedrich on this. In my own case, thoughts do come and go whether I want it or not. Neither pursuing one chain of thought nor suppressing another keeps new and different thoughts from arising.

Some scientist said there is an area in our brain that produces thoughts automatically. I think he’s right.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[SnakeSpectator 2080]

He seems to be attacking Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy, “I think, therefore I am”. In essence, continuing the work of Kierkegaard’s belief in the absurd, and laying the foundation for future existentialists such as Albert Camus and Jean-Paul Sartre. Women are like Bene Gesserit, and men are like Muad’Dib. Philosophy is the place men go that is terrifying to women, and where they cannot go.

[TheDigestedRedPillParticipant 165]

Snake wrote:

He seems to be attacking Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy, “I think, therefore I am”. In essence, continuing the work of Kierkegaard’s belief in the absurd, and laying the foundation for future existentialists such as Albert Camus and Jean-Paul Sartre. Women are like Bene Gesserit, and men are like Muad’Dib. Philosophy is the place men go that is terrifying to women, and where they cannot go.

WINNING !!!!!!!!!

Society live's as if we have reached the pinnacle of human potential. Technological Advancement and Innovation, intellectualism, critical thinking is substituted for useless innovations, nasty narcissistic games, tyrannical laws that destroy the very foundation of family, and the world as we know it.

[Author]

Posts