If All Men Stood Together

Topic by Lone Sea Voyager

Lone Sea Voyager

Home Forums MGTOW Central If All Men Stood Together

This topic contains 33 replies, has 23 voices, and was last updated by  Lone Sea Voyager 4 years, 1 month ago.

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 31 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #160846
    +17
    Lone Sea Voyager
    Lone Sea Voyager
    Participant
    506

    If you are out a lot, you will see a very common behavior come from the men who are still a part of the rat race, but it is even more-so common with the men who seek the approval of women (AKA white knights, captain save-a-hos, manginas, etc). What happens when you try to be pleasant company around them, and a woman shows up? They will most often try to put you down, look bigger, or try and make themselves look better.

    These kinds of guys are the type that will do things to gain the approval of the wenches, and from their mentally stunted white-knight sheeple. But there doesn’t always have to be a woman around for them to do this, because when it comes to getting an ego-boost to fuel their false sense of “manliness” or superiority, this is what these sorts of guys will do.

    This is not just a small problem, because it is very common among men who still subscribe to bulls~~~ to do. It is so common, that feminists, the system. and the media are aware of it, and they like it, They like knowing that we will put each other down, because it allows them to get away with cruel treatment towards us. The entire system of misandry benefits from it, because as long as we all hate eachother, we won’t care about it.

    We won’t care about how other men are getting finanically raped, being drafted, still getting forcefully circumcised at birth, or being ignored by the education system. And most importantly, we won’t have the will to go our own ways, because we will still be busy trying to impress that girl Jane by beating each other to the death, This is something that all feminists want the most, for their to be chaos among us. Why else are women so amused when men fight?

    You know what would devastate these people the most? If men all patted each other on the backs, said “Hey dude, you may be out of shape, but you are badass at mountain climbing.”, and stood up all together, against the media, feminism, and the system. If men stopped trying to knock each other down, and shook hands, respect for men would go up almost over-night. But not to worry fellas, we are just doing that. It’s why this website has been attacked so often, because women HATE the fact that we aren’t trying to sucker punch each others’ faces just so we can have her high-mileage pussy.

    Be proud, brothers.

    #160850
    +10
    RoyDal
    RoyDal
    Participant

    If All Men Stood Together

    Ain’t gonna happen. Most men, meaning 99% of us, are going to follow and obey their DNA programming. I can’t blame them, no not really. They are just doing what we all have been told to do.

    Edit: Just because it was a good idea 100K years ago, does not mean blind obedience to our genetic programming is good idea now.

    In fact, I assert the contrary!

    Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

    #160851
    +4
    Blue Skies
    Blue Skies
    Participant
    15665

    sucker punch each others’ faces just so we can have her high-mileage pussy.

    Aye Aye Pirate,
    more mileage than a Fedex truck

    MGTOW is not a movement, it is a way of life.

    #160852
    +4
    The Skank Spanker
    The Skank Spanker
    Participant
    1372

    I like your philosophy. Too bad this isn’t happening any time soon.

    Blue-pill men will almost always value crappy female companionship or a chance to get in her panties above anything else. They are continually undermined by their lack of female knowledge, 0-standards & boundaries and female manipulation.

    Red-pill men will always be a minority. As long as we are, nothing will really change overnight. Maybe in a decade or two, 50% of men will be MGTOW because they are fed up with entitled, privileged selfish women?

    #160855
    +10
    Jan Sobieski
    Jan Sobieski
    Participant
    28791

    What difference does it make? I’m to the point I really don’t care if women change or not. I’m MGTOW and even if women changed, I still not going back to the plantation.

    Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

    #160862
    +12
    Lone Sea Voyager
    Lone Sea Voyager
    Participant
    506

    THESKANKSPANKER wrote:
    Red-pill men will always be a minority. As long as we are, nothing will really change overnight.

    Maybe so, but if you look at the rate of marriage plummeting, you’ll see a lot of men have wised-up. Again, this doesn’t indicate that they could be absolute Mgtows, but that does show we’re getting somewhere.

    Jan.Sobieski wrote:
    What difference does it make? I’m to the point I really don’t care if women change or not. I’m MGTOW and even if women changed, I still not going back to the plantation.

    Bingo. Don’t even give a s~~~ about the entire system, and your unaffected by their afflictions. If enough men are like us, then it affects the system. There is so much irony about it, but it’s quite a lovely thing.

    #160865
    +5
    Lone Sea Voyager
    Lone Sea Voyager
    Participant
    506

    AWALT wrote:
    Aye Aye Pirate,
    more mileage than a Fedex truck

    That’s very kind of you, but I’d say more like the mileage of a plane. As for me, a scurvy dog like me aint putting his willy in the NYC sewer!

    #160887
    +10
    Snake
    Snake
    Spectator
    2080

    I have a better idea: if all men stood up for themselves. I am more in favor of leaderless resistance. He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither. – Benjamin Franklin

    #161061
    +1
    MattNYC
    MattNYC
    Participant
    2329

    I am more in favor of leaderless resistance.

    Are you aware of any historical circumstances where this happened? I thought pretty much all major political movements – revolutions/resistances included – had some leader(s), but i’m not sure. Would be an interesting topic to dig in to.

    #161070
    +7
    Zuberi Tau
    Zuberi Tau
    Participant
    10606

    Brotherhood is a beautiful thing.
    That’s why it’s so dangerous to blood sucking leeches.

    Behold, how good and how pleasant it is For brothers to dwell together in unity!
    -Psalms 133:1-

    #161161
    +3
    Atton
    Atton
    Participant

    This forum is a pretty good example of men standing with the interests of men.

    A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

    #161192
    +3
    Anthony
    Anthony
    Participant
    241

    The best soldier does not attack. The superior fighter succeeds without violence. The greatest conqueror wins without struggle. The most successful manager leads without dictating. This is intelligent non aggressiveness. This is called the mastery of men

    Lao Tzu

    #161198
    +2
    Scandinavian
    Scandinavian
    Participant
    590

    It doesn’t really matter. They can do whatever they wish as far as I’m concerned. People in general will not and cannot be united in any higher degree, and this is a good thing, not a threat; it just proves we are individuals. Unlike some, I don’t see any need to go to a gender war, that would be a pointless waste of energy that can be put to better use in doing things that improve my life instead of fighting for a Utopia that will never happen.

    #161230
    +1
    Mango Ingaway
    Mango Ingaway
    Participant
    2264

    There’s a saying in french that goes: “Avec des si, on mettrait Paris en bouteille.”

    “With “if’s, you’d put Paris in a bottle.”

    It is a common failing of childhood to think that if one makes a hero out of a demon the demon will be satisfied.

    #161297
    Snake
    Snake
    Spectator
    2080

    I am more in favor of leaderless resistance.

    Are you aware of any historical circumstances where this happened? I thought pretty much all major political movements – revolutions/resistances included – had some leader(s), but i’m not sure. Would be an interesting topic to dig in to.

    Historical? No need for that. Turn the news on and look at the flood of muslim invaders into Europe.

    #161298
    Scandinavian
    Scandinavian
    Participant
    590

    I am more in favor of leaderless resistance.

    Are you aware of any historical circumstances where this happened? I thought pretty much all major political movements – revolutions/resistances included – had some leader(s), but i’m not sure. Would be an interesting topic to dig in to.

    Historical? No need for that. Turn the news on and look at the flood of muslim invaders into Europe.

    Indeed interesting. I’m no migrations advocate, but I am sceptical as for the movements against it, it’s just too darn easy, too set up….

    #161389
    +2
    Maraudrz1
    Maraudrz1
    Participant
    2250

    As long as we MGTOWs are in existence we will be attacked. We will continue to grow. When we get big enough even the government will see us as a threat. Laws will be enacted to attack us but we will come up with new strategies, we can’t be beaten. Society will eventually have to see things our way. Men are still powerful in that we can’t really be put down as a group as long as we stick together and MGTOWs continue to exist. When enough men become MGTOWs then will society either collapse or change. We will win by default by ghosting out from society and become passive and abandoning society. MGTOW!!!!!!

    Women's brains and vagina have one thing in common. There is nothing in there until a man puts something in there.

    #161390
    +4
    Maraudrz1
    Maraudrz1
    Participant
    2250

    If all men went on strike for a week this society would collapse.

    Women's brains and vagina have one thing in common. There is nothing in there until a man puts something in there.

    #161512
    Snake
    Snake
    Spectator
    2080

    I came across this article that explains it pretty well.

    http://www.louisbeam.com/leaderless.htm

    “It was, as the first American patriots knew, totally unnecessary for anyone to give an order for anything.”

    #161794
    +1

    Anonymous
    1

    I saw this on the BBC a few years ago, it was a (so called) social experiment show called “The Week The Women Went” (apparently the US had one in 2012?).

    It was originally designed by the BBC to show men as being inept idiots who can’t survive without women: http://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/pressreleases/stories/2005/03_march/04/women.shtml

    Oh how they were wrong… Read through the feminist crap, and you can glean the real truth. Men live quite happily without women, they build a society, things get done, everyone pitches in, it gets organised, it moves forward. http://men.typepad.com/mens_hour/2005/08/the_week_the_wo.html

    Could the women have done that? No way.
    Women bring progress to a halt as they want all resources for themselves, instead of the community.

    Plain and simple: Men do not need women, period.

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 31 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.